Literature DB >> 10976034

Sniffing by a silkworm moth: wing fanning enhances air penetration through and pheromone interception by antennae.

C Loudon1, M A Koehl.   

Abstract

Many organisms increase the air or water flow adjacent to olfactory surfaces when exposed to appropriate chemical stimuli; such 'sniffing' samples fluid from a specific region and can increase the rate of interception of odorant molecules. We used hot-wire anemometry, high-speed videography and flow visualization to study air flow near the feathery olfactory antennae of male silkworm moths (Bombyx mori L.). When exposed to conspecific female sex pheromone, male B. mori flap their wings through a stroke angle of 90-110 degrees at approximately 40 Hz without flying. This behavior generates an unsteady flow of air (mean speed 0.3-0.4 m s(-1)) towards the antennae from the front of the male. A pulse of peak air speed occurs at each wing upstroke. The Womersley number (characterizing the damping of pulsatile flow through the gaps between the sensory hairs on the antennae) is less than 1; hence, pulses of faster air (at 40 Hz) should move between sensory hairs. Calculation of flow through arrays of cylinders suggest that this wing fanning can increase the rate of interception of pheromone by the sensory hairs on the antennae by at least an order of magnitude beyond that in still air. Although wing fanning produces air flow relative to the antennae that is approximately 15 times faster than that generated by walking at top speed (0.023 m s(-1)), air flow through the gaps between the sensory hairs is approximately 560 times faster because a dramatic increase in the leakiness of the feathery antennae to air flow occurs at the air velocities produced by fanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976034     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.19.2977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  28 in total

1.  Divergence of streamlines approaching a pectinate insect antenna: consequences for chemoreception.

Authors:  Catherine Loudon; Elizabeth C Davis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Position around a tree: consequences for pheromone detection.

Authors:  Ginger L Miller; Catherine Loudon; Sarah Freed
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Representation of a mixture of pheromone and host plant odor by antennal lobe projection neurons of the silkmoth Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Shigehiro Namiki; Satoshi Iwabuchi; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Insect-controlled Robot: A Mobile Robot Platform to Evaluate the Odor-tracking Capability of an Insect.

Authors:  Noriyasu Ando; Shuhei Emoto; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Transduction in Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons is invariant to air speed.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Females of the bumblebee parasite, Aphomia sociella, excite males using a courtship pheromone.

Authors:  Jiří Kindl; Pavel Jiroš; Blanka Kalinová; Petr Záček; Irena Valterová
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Mechanisms of odor-tracking: multiple sensors for enhanced perception and behavior.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Brian J Duistermars; Mark A Frye; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.505

8.  Odors Pulsed at Wing Beat Frequencies are Tracked by Primary Olfactory Networks and Enhance Odor Detection.

Authors:  Shreejoy J Tripathy; Oakland J Peters; Erich M Staudacher; Faizan R Kalwar; Mandy N Hatfield; Kevin C Daly
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Leakiness and flow capture ratio of insect pectinate antennae.

Authors:  Mourad Jaffar-Bandjee; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Neural Encoding of Odors during Active Sampling and in Turbulent Plumes.

Authors:  Stephen J Huston; Mark Stopfer; Stijn Cassenaer; Zane N Aldworth; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.