Literature DB >> 26456024

Brain size-related breeding strategies in a seabird.

Kim Jaatinen1, Markus Öst2.   

Abstract

The optimal compromise between decision speed and accuracy may depend on cognitive ability, associated with the degree of encephalization: larger brain size may select for accurate but slow decision-making, beneficial under challenging conditions but costly under benign ones. How this brain size-dependent selection pressure shapes avian breeding phenology and reproductive performance remains largely unexplored. We predicted that (1) large-brained individuals have a delayed breeding schedule due to thorough nest-site selection and/or prolonged resource acquisition, (2) good condition facilitates early breeding independent of relative brain size, and (3) large brain size accrues benefits mainly to individuals challenged by environmental or intrinsic constraints. To test these predictions, we examined how the relative head volume of female eiders (Somateria mollissima) of variable body condition correlated with their breeding schedule, hatching success and offspring quality. The results were consistent with our predictions. First, large head size was associated with a progressively later onset of breeding with increasing breeding dispersal distance. Second, increasing body condition advanced the timing of breeding, but this effect was significantly weaker in large-brained females. Third, larger head volume was associated with increased hatching success mainly among late breeders and those in poor body condition, and duckling body condition was positively related to maternal head volume, but only in poor-condition mothers. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate the presence of brain size-related differences in reproductive strategies within a single natural population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal personality; Breeding phenology; Breeding success; Cognition; Speed–accuracy trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26456024     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3468-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

Review 1.  The timing of birds' breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding.

Authors:  Simon Verhulst; Jan-Ake Nilsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains.

Authors:  Daniel Sol
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Peter Skorupski; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Hesitation behaviour of hoverflies Sphaerophoria spp. to avoid ambush by crab spiders.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Kenji Fujisaki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-10-04

5.  Brain size, head size and behaviour of a passerine bird.

Authors:  A P Møller
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Causes and consequences of fine-scale breeding dispersal in a female-philopatric species.

Authors:  Markus Ost; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Kim Jaatinen; Mikael Kilpi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Context dependency of baseline glucocorticoids as indicators of individual quality in a capital breeder.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Martin W Seltmann; Tuula Hollmén; Shannon Atkinson; Kendall Mashburn; Markus Öst
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.822

8.  Mammalian choices: combining fast-but-inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems.

Authors:  Pete C Trimmer; Alasdair I Houston; James A R Marshall; Rafal Bogacz; Elizabeth S Paul; Mike T Mendl; John M McNamara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Age-specific nest-site preference and success in eiders.

Authors:  Markus Ost; Benjamin B Steele
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain.

Authors:  Alexander Kotrschal; Björn Rogell; Andreas Bundsen; Beatrice Svensson; Susanne Zajitschek; Ioana Brännström; Simone Immler; Alexei A Maklakov; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

1.  Brain size and the risk of getting shot.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Johannes Erritzøe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Mitigating impacts of invasive alien predators on an endangered sea duck amidst high native predation pressure.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Ida Hermansson; Bertille Mohring; Benjamin B Steele; Markus Öst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.