Literature DB >> 27807251

Brain size and the risk of getting shot.

Anders Pape Møller1, Johannes Erritzøe2.   

Abstract

Hunting kills hundreds of millions of animals annually, potentially constituting an important selection pressure on hunted species. We hypothesized that hunted individuals differing from survivors by having better ability to distinguish between dangerous humans and other human beings would be at a selective advantage. We tested whether shot individual birds had smaller brains than survivors, under the assumption that individuals with larger brains had superior escape ability. We used a large database on birds from Denmark to test whether getting shot was predicted by brain mass, while controlling statistically for the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, body mass and body condition. Analyses based on all species, or only species that were hunted, while controlling for differences in sampling effort in random effects models, showed consistently that shot individuals had smaller brains than survivors.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  birds; brain mass; hunting; viability selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807251      PMCID: PMC5134045          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales.

Authors:  David O Conover; Stephan B Munch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  High hunting pressure selects for earlier birth date: wild boar as a case study.

Authors:  Marlène Gamelon; Aurélien Besnard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Sabrina Servanty; Eric Baubet; Serge Brandt; Olivier Gimenez
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  A critique of comparative studies of brain size.

Authors:  Susan D Healy; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species.

Authors:  Nils Bunnefeld; David Baines; David Newborn; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Predator-prey interactions, flight initiation distance and brain size.

Authors:  A P Møller; J Erritzøe
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Brain size, head size and behaviour of a passerine bird.

Authors:  A P Møller
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Chimpanzee and felid diet composition is influenced by prey brain size.

Authors:  Susanne Shultz; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Brain size-related breeding strategies in a seabird.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Markus Öst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Brain size, hunting and the risk of getting shot: a reply to Zink & Stuber (2017).

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Johannes Erritzøe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  No relationship between brain size and risk of being shot in hunted birds: a comment on Møller & Erritzøe (2016).

Authors:  Robert M Zink; Erica F Stuber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Brain size in birds is related to traffic accidents.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Johannes Erritzøe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Small brains predisposed Late Quaternary mammals to extinction.

Authors:  Jacob Dembitzer; Silvia Castiglione; Pasquale Raia; Shai Meiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Decomposing the effects of ocean environments on predator-prey body-size relationships in food webs.

Authors:  Tomoya Dobashi; Midori Iida; Kazuhiro Takemoto
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.