Literature DB >> 19409649

Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making.

Lars Chittka1, Peter Skorupski, Nigel E Raine.   

Abstract

The traditional emphasis when measuring performance in animal cognition has been overwhelmingly on accuracy, independent of decision time. However, more recently, it has become clear that tradeoffs exist between decision speed and accuracy in many ecologically relevant tasks, for example, prey and predator detection and identification; pollinators choosing between flower species; and spatial exploration strategies. Obtaining high-quality information often increases sampling time, especially under noisy conditions. Here we discuss the mechanisms generating such speed-accuracy tradeoffs, their implications for animal decision making (including signalling, communication and mate choice) and the significance of differences in decision strategies among species, populations and individuals. The ecological relevance of such tradeoffs can be better understood by considering the neuronal mechanisms underlying decision-making processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409649     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  130 in total

1.  Speed-accuracy trade-offs during foraging decisions in the acellular slime mould Physarum polycephalum.

Authors:  Tanya Latty; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain.

Authors:  Rui F Oliveira; José M Simões; Magda C Teles; Catarina R Oliveira; Jorg D Becker; João S Lopes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Irrational time allocation in decision-making.

Authors:  Bastiaan Oud; Ian Krajbich; Kevin Miller; Jin Hyun Cheong; Matthew Botvinick; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fast and reliable decisions for a dynamic song parameter in field crickets.

Authors:  Daniela Trobe; Richard Schuster; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy.

Authors:  Takao Sasaki; Boris Granovskiy; Richard P Mann; David J T Sumpter; Stephen C Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Saccade target selection relies on feedback competitive signal integration.

Authors:  Joke P Kalisvaart; André J Noest; Albert V van den Berg; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Geneviève Aude Puskas; Stephany El-Murr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Christoph Grüter; Sam M Jones; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Ambush frequency should increase over time during optimal predator search for prey.

Authors:  Steve Alpern; Robbert Fokkink; Marco Timmer; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Aversive reinforcement improves visual discrimination learning in free-flying honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Maria G de Brito Sanchez; Martin Giurfa; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.