Literature DB >> 35028754

Mitigating impacts of invasive alien predators on an endangered sea duck amidst high native predation pressure.

Kim Jaatinen1, Ida Hermansson2, Bertille Mohring2,3, Benjamin B Steele4, Markus Öst2,5.   

Abstract

Anthropogenically introduced invasive species represent a major threat to global biodiversity by causing population declines and extinctions of native species. The negative impacts of introduced predators are well documented, yet a fundamental knowledge gap exists regarding the efficiency of potential mitigation methods to restore the ecosystem. Other understudied aspects concern prey behavioural antipredator responses and the historical context of native predator-prey interactions, which may moderate invasion impacts on native prey. Invasion impacts of American mink (Neovison vison) and raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) into the Baltic Sea archipelago are poorly understood, and the efficiency of removal efforts as a means to alleviate depredation pressure on native prey is debated. Here, we examine the effectiveness of invasive predator removal on ground-nesting female common eider (Somateria mollissima) mortality, breeding success and breeding propensity over a 9-year period, while controlling for predation risk imposed by the main native predator, the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla). Our results clearly show that intensified removal of American minks and raccoon dogs decreased the number of female eiders killed during nesting, while improving both nesting success and breeding propensity. Such obvious positive effects of invasive predator removal are particularly noteworthy against the backdrop of a soaring eagle population, indicating that the impacts of invasives may become accentuated when native predators differ taxonomically and by hunting mode. This study shows that invasive alien predator removal is an effective conservation measure clearly aiding native fauna even under severe native predation pressure. Such cost-effective conservation actions call for governmental deployment across large areas.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian conservation; Common eider; Ecosystem restoration; Invasive species; Predator control

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35028754     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-05101-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  25 in total

Review 1.  Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators.

Authors:  Jonathan G Cox; Steven L Lima
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.

Authors:  Tim S Doherty; Alistair S Glen; Dale G Nimmo; Euan G Ritchie; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prey Responses to Exotic Predators: Effects of Old Risks and New Cues.

Authors:  Sean M Ehlman; Pete C Trimmer; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Predicting Predator Recognition in a Changing World.

Authors:  Alexandra J R Carthey; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Philopatric predisposition to predation-induced ecological traps: habitat-dependent mortality of breeding eiders.

Authors:  Johan Ekroos; Markus Öst; Patrik Karell; Kim Jaatinen; Mikael Kilpi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Brood size matching: a novel perspective on predator dilution.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Markus Öst
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Using raptors as environmental sentinels: monitoring the white-tailed sea eagle Haliaeetus albicilla in Sweden.

Authors:  Björn Helander; Anders Bignert; Lillemor Asplund
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Brain size-related breeding strategies in a seabird.

Authors:  Kim Jaatinen; Markus Öst
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Getting ready for invasions: can background level of risk predict the ability of naïve prey to survive novel predators?

Authors:  Maud C O Ferrari; Adam L Crane; Grant E Brown; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences.

Authors:  Alec P Christie; David Abecasis; Mehdi Adjeroud; Juan C Alonso; Tatsuya Amano; Alvaro Anton; Barry P Baldigo; Rafael Barrientos; Jake E Bicknell; Deborah A Buhl; Just Cebrian; Ricardo S Ceia; Luciana Cibils-Martina; Sarah Clarke; Joachim Claudet; Michael D Craig; Dominique Davoult; Annelies De Backer; Mary K Donovan; Tyler D Eddy; Filipe M França; Jonathan P A Gardner; Bradley P Harris; Ari Huusko; Ian L Jones; Brendan P Kelaher; Janne S Kotiaho; Adrià López-Baucells; Heather L Major; Aki Mäki-Petäys; Beatriz Martín; Carlos A Martín; Philip A Martin; Daniel Mateos-Molina; Robert A McConnaughey; Michele Meroni; Christoph F J Meyer; Kade Mills; Monica Montefalcone; Norbertas Noreika; Carlos Palacín; Anjali Pande; C Roland Pitcher; Carlos Ponce; Matt Rinella; Ricardo Rocha; María C Ruiz-Delgado; Juan J Schmitter-Soto; Jill A Shaffer; Shailesh Sharma; Anna A Sher; Doriane Stagnol; Thomas R Stanley; Kevin D E Stokesbury; Aurora Torres; Oliver Tully; Teppo Vehanen; Corinne Watts; Qingyuan Zhao; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Health Status of Bycaught Common Eiders (Somateria mollissima) from the Western Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Luca A Schick; Peter Wohlsein; Silke Rautenschlein; Arne Jung; Joy Ometere Boyi; Gildas Glemarec; Anne-Mette Kroner; Stefanie A Barth; Ursula Siebert
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.