Literature DB >> 22945811

Effect of SWL on renal hemodynamics: could a change in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses be the cause?

Erdal Yilmaz1, Cagatay Mert, Zuhal Keskil, Devrim Tuglu, Ertan Batislam.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal the effect of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on renal artery contraction-relaxation responses and the relation of this effect with renal hemodynamics. Twenty-four rabbits are divided into six different groups. The first two groups evaluated as the control groups. After isolating the kidneys, we applied phenylephrine (Ph) and acetylcholine (Ach) in the first group and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and histamine (H) in the second group. In the third, fourth, fifth and sixth groups, 14.5 kV shock wave (SW) was focused on the left kidneys. We adjusted the number of shocks to a total of 500, 1,500, and 3,000 SW, in the third, fourth and fifth groups, respectively. After isolating the kidneys, Ph, Ach was given in groups 3, 4 and 5. In the sixth group, to get the SNP and the H responses, 3,000 shocks modality was utilized. Marked contractile responses were obtained by phenylephrine in the control group. In kidneys that were exposed to 500 shocks SWL procedures, a decrease in contractile responses and hence, in perfusion pressures in different concentrations of phenylephrine was noted. However, a notable change in relaxation responses occurred after 3,000-shock applications. No difference in relaxation responses to nitroprusside, a direct vasodilating agent, was observed in any group, compared to the control group. Another cause of deterioration of renal hemodynamics after SWL can be attributed to the reduction in renal artery contraction-relaxation responses that result in the vascular smooth muscle and endothelial damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22945811     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-012-0504-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  26 in total

1.  Cumulative renal damage in dogs by repeated treatment with extracorporeal shock waves.

Authors:  H Koga; K Matsuoka; S Noda; T Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.369

2.  Quantitation of shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion in small and large pig kidneys.

Authors:  P M Blomgren; B A Connors; J E Lingeman; L R Willis; A P Evan
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1997-11

3.  Changes in resistive index following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Y Aoki; S Ishitoya; K Okubo; T Okada; S Maekawa; H Maeda; Y Arai
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 4.  The renin-angiotensin system.

Authors:  Kar Neng Lai; Joseph C K Leung; Sydney C W Tang
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.580

5.  The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on antioxidant enzymes in erythrocytes.

Authors:  Yilmaz Aksoy; Ismail Malkoc; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Hülya Aksoy; Konca Altinkaynak; Fatih Akcay
Journal:  Cell Biochem Funct       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.685

6.  Effects of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy on intrarenal resistive index.

Authors:  Hasan Nazaroglu; A Ferruh Akay; Yasar Bükte; Hayrettin Sahin; Zeki Akkus; Aslan Bilici
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003

7.  Hypertension and the absence of EDHF-mediated responses favour endothelium-dependent contractions in renal arteries of the rat.

Authors:  F S Michel; G S Man; R Y K Man; P M Vanhoutte
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  The role of lithotripsy and its side effects.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J Woods; P D Toth; A P Evan; J A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Age-related changes in resistive index following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  R Knapp; F Frauscher; G Helweg; D zur Nedden; H Strasser; G Janetschek; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Morphological and functional changes in canine kidneys following extracorporeal shock-wave treatment.

Authors:  P Jaeger; F Redha; K Marquardt; G Uhlschmid; D Hauri
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wrong perspective obscures the adverse effects of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Davor Eterović; Marijan Situm; Vinko Marković; Ante Punda
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Evaluation of selected Doppler parameters of renal blood flow in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Krzysztof Balawender; Stanisław Orkisz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-07-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.