Literature DB >> 26452633

Assessing System Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using Rectangle Target Plots.

Peter Müller1, Andrew Hattemer2, Peter Stephan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from accuracy assessments of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) are often visualized in difference or regression plots. These approaches become more difficult to read as the number of data points displayed increases, thus limiting their use. In the recently presented rectangle target plot (RTP) approach, data from each reagent system lot or product are displayed graphically as a single rectangle, thus allowing the plot to remain comprehensible even when displaying system accuracy data from multiple reagent system lots or products.
METHODS: The RTP illustrates the accuracy of SMBG systems. Each rectangle shows the mean bias and the variability of a system. By use of statistical tolerance intervals, each rectangle most closely approximates the total error for lower (<100 mg/dL) and upper (≥100 mg/dL) glucose concentrations. RTPs were created for data from 8 different manufacturers of systems for SMBG. In total, the accuracy data of 87 different reagent system lots of 50 different SMBG systems were displayed in RTPs.
RESULTS: The RTP approach was suitable for 81 of the 87 reagent system lots analyzed. In the remaining cases, outliers caused excessive skewness of the distribution of measurements. The reagent system lots analyzed were grouped according to manufacturer in RTPs. Data from 3 to 15 different reagent system lots were displayed in each RTP.
CONCLUSION: Applying the RTP approach to a large number of reagent system lots showed that it was suitable in more than 93% of cases analyzed. The display of system accuracy data in RTPs enables lot-to-lot variability within specific products and product reliability of specific manufacturers to be visualized in a comprehensible manner.
© 2015 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ISO 15197; rectangle target plot; self-monitoring of blood glucose; system accuracy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26452633      PMCID: PMC4773970          DOI: 10.1177/1932296815612496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  8 in total

1.  The association of self-monitoring of blood glucose use with medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating non-insulin treatment.

Authors:  Naunihal Virdi; Mehmet Daskiran; Somesh Nigam; Chris Kozma; Praveen Raja
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  Accuracy assessment of an advanced blood glucose monitoring system for self-testing with three reagent system lots following ISO 15197:2013.

Authors:  Annette Baumstark; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Delia Rittmeyer; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-07

5.  Accuracy assessment of two novel systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197:2013.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Annette Baumstark; Cornelia Haug; Erhard Stolberg; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-25

6.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Eva Zschornack; Serge Kocher; Jacques Tshiananga; Frank Heister; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  The Rectangle Target Plot: A New Approach to the Graphical Presentation of Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Peter Stephan; Christina Schmid; Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-09

8.  Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Bettina Petersen; Matthias Schweitzer; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197.

Authors:  Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Jochen Mende; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-14

2.  Strengths and Limitations of New Approaches for Graphical Presentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Data.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Frank Flacke; Jochen Sieber; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Jochen Mende; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-05

4.  Real-world practice level data analysis confirms link between variability within Blood Glucose Monitoring Strip (BGMS) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Adrian H Heald; Mark Livingston; Anthony Fryer; Gabriela Cortes; Simon G Anderson; Roger Gadsby; Ian Laing; Mark Lunt; Robert J Young; Mike Stedman
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.