| Literature DB >> 26446634 |
Sung-Jin Hong1, Byeong-Keuk Kim2,3, Dong-Ho Shin2,3, Jung-Sun Kim2,3, Young-Guk Ko2,3, Donghoon Choi2,3, Yangsoo Jang2,3,4, Myeong-Ki Hong2,3,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of pre-procedural coronary plaque composition assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) on late stent malapposition assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.Entities:
Keywords: Drug-eluting stent; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26446634 PMCID: PMC4630040 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Yonsei Med J ISSN: 0513-5796 Impact factor: 2.759
Baseline Clinical and Procedural Characteristics
| Overall, n=121 | Late stent malapposition (+), n=37 | Late stent malapposition (-), n=84 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 61±9 | 63±8 | 60±10 | 0.063 |
| Male, n (%) | 88 (73) | 29 (78) | 59 (70) | 0.354 |
| Clinical presentation, n (%) | 0.205 | |||
| Stable angina | 78 (65) | 27 (73) | 51 (61) | |
| Unstable angina | 25 (20) | 4 (11) | 21 (25) | |
| Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction | 18 (15) | 6 (16) | 12 (14) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 74 (61) | 27 (73) | 47 (56) | 0.077 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 42 (35) | 11 (30) | 31 (37) | 0.445 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 67 (55) | 27 (73) | 40 (48) | 0.010 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 31 (26) | 10 (27) | 21 (25) | 0.814 |
| Target lesions, n (%) | 0.357 | |||
| Left anterior descending | 73 (60) | 22 (60) | 51 (61) | |
| Left circumflex | 20 (17) | 4 (11) | 16 (19) | |
| Right coronary artery | 28 (23) | 11 (30) | 17 (20) | |
| Presence of thrombus on angiography | 9 (7) | 2 (5) | 7 (8) | 0.572 |
| Reference vessel diameter, mm | 3.1±0.5 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.0±0.5 | 0.024 |
| Pre-procedural minimal lumen diameter, mm | 1.2±0.4 | 1.3±0.5 | 1.1±0.3 | 0.136 |
| Post-procedural minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.9±0.4 | 2.9±0.3 | 2.8±0.4 | 0.209 |
| Post-procedural diameter stenosis, % | 9.0±7.4 | 10.7±5.4 | 8.3±8.1 | 0.119 |
| Follow-up minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.7±0.5 | 2.8±0.5 | 2.6±0.5 | 0.050 |
| Follow-up diameter stenosis, % | 9.9±13 | 7.7±11.9 | 10.9±12.7 | 0.192 |
| Lesion length, mm | 16.4±4.6 | 18.0±4.6 | 15.7±4.4 | 0.027 |
| Plaque modification procedure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Stent diameter, mm | 3.2±0.4 | 3.3±0.3 | 3.2±0.4 | 0.250 |
| Stent length, mm | 19.1±4.6 | 20.5±4.8 | 18.5±4.5 | 0.035 |
| Stent type, n (%) | 0.852 | |||
| Sirolimus-eluting stent | 36 (30) | 12 (32) | 24 (29) | |
| Zotarolimus-eluting stent | 31 (26) | 10 (27) | 21(25) | |
| Everolimus-eluting stent | 8 (7) | 3 (8) | 5 (6) | |
| Biolimus-eluting stent | 46 (38) | 12 (32) | 34 (41) | |
| Post-dilation, n (%) | 82 (68) | 26 (70) | 56 (67) | 0.696 |
| Maximal dilated pressure, atm | 17.6±3.5 |
Pre-Procedural VH-IVUS
| Total, n=121 | Late stent malapposition (+), n=37 | Late stent malapposition (-), n=84 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-procedural gray-scale IVUS characteristics | ||||
| Target lesion CSA with minimum lumen area | ||||
| EEM CSA, mm2 | 13.0±4.1 | 14.2±4.1 | 12.4±4.1 | 0.028 |
| Lumen CSA, mm2 | 2.7±0.9 | 3.2±1.2 | 2.5±0.6 | 0.003 |
| P&M CSA, mm2 | 10.2±4.0 | 11.0±3.8 | 9.9±4.0 | 0.139 |
| Plaque burden, % | 77.3±9.0 | 76.5±9.2 | 77.6±8.9 | 0.529 |
| Pre-procedural VH-IVUS characteristics | ||||
| Absolute total plaque volume, mm3 | ||||
| Necrotic core | 22.9±19.0 | 30.7±22.3 | 19.5±16.4 | 0.008 |
| Dense calcium | 7.9±9.6 | 12.3±14.5 | 5.9±5.4 | 0.012 |
| Fibrotic | 63.8±33.8 | 68.1±28.7 | 61.9±35.8 | 0.358 |
| Fibrofatty | 16.5±12.4 | 16.5±13.1 | 16.6±12.1 | 0.973 |
| Relative total plaque volume, % | ||||
| Necrotic core | 18.9±9.1 | 22.1±8.7 | 17.4±8.9 | 0.009 |
| Dense calcium | 6.7±5.1 | 8.6±5.9 | 5.9±4.5 | 0.008 |
| Fibrotic | 59.3±9.8 | 56.4±9.8 | 60.5±9.6 | 0.031 |
| Fibrofatty | 15.1±10.3 | 12.7±7.8 | 16.2±11.1 | 0.081 |
IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; EEM, external elastic membrane; CSA, cross-sectional area; P&M, plaque and media; VH, virtual histology.
Values were presented as mean±standard deviation.
Pre-Procedural VH-IVUS and Matched Follow-Up OCT Characteristics
| Follow-up OCT characteristics | Total, n=121 |
|---|---|
| Time interval to follow-up OCT, months | 6.3±3.1 |
| Total mean number of cross sections, n | 17.2±5.0 |
| Total mean number of analyzable struts, n | 189±58 |
| Mean stent CSA, mm2 | 7.5±2.0 |
| Mean lumen CSA, mm2 | 7.0±2.0 |
| Mean NIH CSA, mm2 | 0.5±0.4 |
| Percentage of NIH CSA, % | 6.5±5.3 |
| Median NIH thickness, µm | 54.5 (35.1-96.3)* |
| Percent malapposed struts, % | 0.8±2.5 |
| Percent uncovered struts, % | 15.3±16.7 |
| Percentage of both of malapposed and uncovered struts, % | 0.5±1.8 |
| Cross sections with any uncovered strut, % | 31.1±37.6 |
| Cross sections with a ratio of uncovered to total strut >0.3, % | 15.4±26.9 |
| Cross sections with any malapposed strut, % | 3.0±9.5 |
| Stent malapposition, n (%) | 37 (31) |
OCT, optical coherence tomography; CSA, cross-sectional area; NIH, neointimal hyperplasia; VH-IVUS, virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
*Was presented as median (interquartile range).
Fig. 1Correlation between absolute total plaque component volumes and percentage of malapposed (A and B) or uncovered struts (C and D) on follow-up OCT. Absolute total NC plaque volume and absolute total DC plaque volume were positively correlated with percentage of malapposed struts but not with percentage of uncovered struts. OCT, optical coherence tomography; NC, necrotic core; DC, dense calcium.
Fig. 2Percentage of malapposed (A) and uncovered struts (B) according to the relative total plaque volume quartiles of each plaque component. The highest relative NC plaque volume quartiles and the highest relative DC plaque volume quartiles had a significantly higher percentage of malapposed struts. NC, necrotic core; DC, dense calcium; FT, fibrotic; FF, fibrofatty.