BACKGROUND: Tissue coverage and strut apposition of drug eluting stents (DES), which can be assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be associated with late stent thrombosis (LST). METHODS: Prospective observational angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 months post-implantation of a biolimus-A9 eluting stent (BES) vs. a paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), with biodegradable polymer carriers. The primary outcome was the percent difference of uncovered struts between BESs and PESs. RESULTS: A maximum likelihood model was used for analysis, to account for data clustering. Sixteen patients were treated with BES (28 lesions/4530 struts) and 16 with PES (23 lesions/4450 struts). Overall, BESs compared to PESs had more uncovered [0.41% vs. 0.21%, difference estimate (DE) 0.2 (95% CI, 0.06-0.34), p=0.006], malapposed [0.18% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.23), p=0.003], uncovered and malapposed [0.08% vs. 0.026%, DE 0.057 (95% CI 0.015-0.1), p=0.01] and protruding struts [0.23% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.185 (95% CI 0.1-0.27), p<0.001], and significantly lower neointimal thickness (59.3 ± 28.2 μm vs. 201.7 ± 97.5, p<0.001). None of the BESs was totally covered with neointima, in contrast to 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.01). Thrombus was detected in 1 (3.6%) BES and 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.05); however, no patient experienced clinical stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Between two stents with biodegradable polymer, OCT demonstrated that BESs had more uncovered and malapposed struts compared to PESs at 6 months. This difference might be partly attributed to the more potent antiproliferative properties of biolimus-A9; however, its impact on clinical outcome and on the risk of LST is yet to be determined.
BACKGROUND: Tissue coverage and strut apposition of drug eluting stents (DES), which can be assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT), may be associated with late stent thrombosis (LST). METHODS: Prospective observational angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 months post-implantation of a biolimus-A9 eluting stent (BES) vs. a paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), with biodegradable polymer carriers. The primary outcome was the percent difference of uncovered struts between BESs and PESs. RESULTS: A maximum likelihood model was used for analysis, to account for data clustering. Sixteen patients were treated with BES (28 lesions/4530 struts) and 16 with PES (23 lesions/4450 struts). Overall, BESs compared to PESs had more uncovered [0.41% vs. 0.21%, difference estimate (DE) 0.2 (95% CI, 0.06-0.34), p=0.006], malapposed [0.18% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.14 (95% CI 0.05-0.23), p=0.003], uncovered and malapposed [0.08% vs. 0.026%, DE 0.057 (95% CI 0.015-0.1), p=0.01] and protruding struts [0.23% vs. 0.04%, DE 0.185 (95% CI 0.1-0.27), p<0.001], and significantly lower neointimal thickness (59.3 ± 28.2 μm vs. 201.7 ± 97.5, p<0.001). None of the BESs was totally covered with neointima, in contrast to 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.01). Thrombus was detected in 1 (3.6%) BES and 5 (21.7%) PESs (p=0.05); however, no patient experienced clinical stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Between two stents with biodegradable polymer, OCT demonstrated that BESs had more uncovered and malapposed struts compared to PESs at 6 months. This difference might be partly attributed to the more potent antiproliferative properties of biolimus-A9; however, its impact on clinical outcome and on the risk of LST is yet to be determined.
Authors: Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Eduardo Alegría-Barrero; Rodrigo Teijeiro-Mestre; Pak Hei Chan; Hiroto Tsujioka; Ranil de Silva; Nicola Viceconte; Alistair Lindsay; Tiffany Patterson; Nicolas Foin; Takashi Akasaka; Carlo di Mario Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Abhilash Akinapelli; Jack P Chen; Kristine Roy; Joseph Donnelly; Keith Dawkins; Barbara Huibregtse; Dongming Hou Journal: Curr Cardiol Rev Date: 2017
Authors: Jacek Bil; Robert J Gil; Adam Kern; Tomasz Pawłowski; Piotr Seweryniak; Zbigniew Śliwiński Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 2.298