Literature DB >> 26445880

The role of rhythm in perceiving speech in noise: a comparison of percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians.

Jessica Slater1,2, Nina Kraus3,4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

The natural rhythms of speech help a listener follow what is being said, especially in noisy conditions. There is increasing evidence for links between rhythm abilities and language skills; however, the role of rhythm-related expertise in perceiving speech in noise is unknown. The present study assesses musical competence (rhythmic and melodic discrimination), speech-in-noise perception and auditory working memory in young adult percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians. Outcomes reveal that better ability to discriminate rhythms is associated with better sentence-in-noise (but not words-in-noise) perception across all participants. These outcomes suggest that sensitivity to rhythm helps a listener understand unfolding speech patterns in degraded listening conditions, and that observations of a "musician advantage" for speech-in-noise perception may be mediated in part by superior rhythm skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Language; Listening; Music; Rhythm; Speech-in-noise perception; Temporal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26445880      PMCID: PMC5019948          DOI: 10.1007/s10339-015-0740-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  57 in total

Review 1.  Dyslexia and music. From timing deficits to musical intervention.

Authors:  Katie Overy
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception.

Authors:  Hugo Quené; Robert F Port
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel A McArdle; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation.

Authors:  Lefkothea-Vasiliki Andreou; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Specialization among the specialized: auditory brainstem function is tuned in to timbre.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Karen Chan; Richard Ashley; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing.

Authors:  Benjamin Rich Zendel; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-09-12

7.  Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Informal musical activities are linked to auditory discrimination and attention in 2-3-year-old children: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  V Putkinen; M Tervaniemi; M Huotilainen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology.

Authors:  Martina Huss; John P Verney; Tim Fosker; Natasha Mead; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Carrie Lam; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

3.  Understanding dysrhythmic speech: When rhythm does not matter and learning does not happen.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Variations on the theme of musical expertise: cognitive and sensory processing in percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jessica Slater; Andrea Azem; Trent Nicol; Britta Swedenborg; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Music and speech distractors disrupt sensorimotor synchronization: effects of musical training.

Authors:  Anita Białuńska; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xueying Fu; Dan Luo; Lidongsheng Xing; Yi Du
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Hemispheric differences between left and right supramarginal gyrus for pitch and rhythm memory.

Authors:  Nora K Schaal; Bettina Pollok; Michael J Banissy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Association Between Cognitive Performance and Speech-in-Noise Perception for Adult Listeners: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Dryden; Harriet A Allen; Helen Henshaw; Antje Heinrich
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Musical Experience, Sensorineural Auditory Processing, and Reading Subskills in Adults.

Authors:  Parker Tichko; Erika Skoe
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-04-27

10.  Spoken Word Recognition Enhancement Due to Preceding Synchronized Beats Compared to Unsynchronized or Unrhythmic Beats.

Authors:  Christos Sidiras; Vasiliki Iliadou; Ioannis Nimatoudis; Tobias Reichenbach; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.