Literature DB >> 7266120

Disclosure of information to patients in medical care.

R R Faden, C Becker, C Lewis, J Freeman, A I Faden.   

Abstract

It is generally agreed that patients have a right to be adequately informed. However, little is known about the extent to which doctors and patients agree about information that should be disclosed. We studied what patients want to know, as contrasted with what physicians report actually disclosing, in a population of physicians who treat seizures and patients or parents of patients who have this disorder. In general, it was found that patients or parents of patients who have this disorder. In general, it was found that patients prefer far more detailed disclosures than physicians routinely offer and that the two groups have widely different beliefs about the consequences of detailed disclosures. Patients and parents preferred extensive disclosures, particularly regarding risks and alternative therapy. Physicians were likely to disclose only risks with a relatively high probability of occurrence and they provided little information about alternative therapies. Patients and parents were also much more likely than physicians to believe that the final decision concerning therapy should rest with the patient. The data suggest that a better empirical understanding of the consequences of detailed disclosures may help resolve differences of opinion regarding how much information should be provided to patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7266120     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198107000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  23 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement.

Authors:  M Simpson; R Buckman; M Stewart; P Maguire; M Lipkin; D Novack; J Till
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-30

Review 4.  University of California Commission on the Future of Medical Education. July 1997. Final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

5.  Patients' knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery.

Authors:  Mary T McLennan; Clifford F Melick; Beverly Alten; Jacqueline Young; Melanie R Hoehn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-08

6.  The Rhetoric of the 'Passive Patient' in Indian Medical Negligence Cases.

Authors:  Supriya Subramani
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-12-04

7.  How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. Informed decision making in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  C H Braddock; S D Fihn; W Levinson; A R Jonsen; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for the primary care physician.

Authors:  D J Mazur
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Filophilia.

Authors:  J M Northover
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A failure to communicate: patients with cerebral aneurysms and vascular neurosurgeons.

Authors:  J T King; H Yonas; M B Horowitz; A B Kassam; M S Roberts
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.