Literature DB >> 26443837

Social Media Use Among Physicians and Trainees: Results of a National Medical Oncology Physician Survey.

Rachel Adilman1, Yanchini Rajmohan1, Edward Brooks1, Gloria Roldan Urgoiti1, Caroline Chung1, Nazik Hammad1, Martina Trinkaus1, Madiha Naseem1, Christine Simmons2, Rachel Adilman1, Yanchini Rajmohan1, Edward Brooks1, Gloria Roldan Urgoiti1, Caroline Chung1, Nazik Hammad1, Martina Trinkaus1, Madiha Naseem1, Christine Simmons2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer management requires coordinated care from many health care providers, and its complexity requires physicians be up to date on current research. Web-based social media support physician collaboration and information sharing, but the extent to which physicians use social media for these purposes remains unknown. The complex field of oncology will benefit from increased use of online social media to enhance physician communication, education, and mentorship. To facilitate this, patterns of social media use among oncologists must be better understood.
METHODS: A nine-item survey investigating physician social media use, designed using online survey software, was distributed via e-mail to 680 oncology physicians and physicians in training in Canada. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: A total of 207 responses (30%) were received; 72% of respondents reported using social media. Social media use was highest, at 93%, in respondents age 25 to 34 years and lowest, at 39%, in those age 45 to 54 years. This demonstrates a significant gap in social media use between younger users and mid- to late-career users. The main barrier to use was lack of free time.
CONCLUSION: The identified gap in social media use between age cohorts may have negative implications for communication in oncology. Despite advancements in social media and efforts to integrate social media into medical education, most oncologists and trainees use social media rarely, which, along with the age-related gap in use, may have consequences for collaboration and education in oncology. Investigations to further understand barriers to social media use should be undertaken to enhance physician collaboration and knowledge sharing through social media.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443837     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  19 in total

Review 1.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  An exploratory study in breast cancer of factors involved in the use and communication with health professionals of Internet information.

Authors:  Cristian Ochoa-Arnedo; Aida Flix-Valle; Anna Casellas-Grau; Nuria Casanovas-Aljaro; Olga Herrero; Enric C Sumalla; María Lleras de Frutos; Agustina Sirgo; Ana Rodríguez; Gloria Campos; Yolanda Valverde; Noémie Travier; Joan Carles Medina
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Are online surgical discussion boards a safe and useful venue for surgeons to ask for advice? A review of the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group.

Authors:  Karla Bernardi; Alexis N Milton; William Hope; John Scott Roth; Shinil K Shah; Puja Shah; Nicole B Lyons; Alexander C Martin; Julie L Holihan; Deepa V Cherla; Tien C Ko; Tyler G Hughes; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients Across the Twitterverse.

Authors:  Nayeli A Martinez-Ibarra; Yuly A Remolina-Bonilla; Hector H Buerba-Vieregge; Regina Barragan-Carrillo; Francisco J Castro-Alonso; Samantha Mateos-Corella; Maria T Bourlon
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

6.  "Some things are even worse than telling a child he is going to die": Pediatric oncology healthcare professionals perspectives on communicating with children about cancer and end of life.

Authors:  Anat Laronne; Leeat Granek; Lori Wiener; Paula Feder-Bubis; Hana Golan
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.838

Review 7.  Social Media in Urology: opportunities, applications, appropriate use and new horizons.

Authors:  Juan Gómez Rivas; Moises Rodríguez Socarrás; Leonardo Tortolero Blanco
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-09-16

8.  Going viral in rheumatology: using social media to show that mechanistic research is relevant to patients with lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas C R McDonnell; Chris Wincup; Anisur Rahman; Ian Giles
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2018-03-05

9.  Are We Witnessing a Paradigm Shift?: A Systematic Review of Social Media in Residency.

Authors:  James M Economides; Youna K Choi; Kenneth L Fan; Arjun P Kanuri; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

10.  Family physicians' utility of social media: a survey comparison among family medicine residents and physicians.

Authors:  Karim Syed Irfan; Irfan Farhana; Al Faris Eiad; Al Maflehi Nassr; Al Qahtani Al Mohammed; Nadeem Maya; Al Hazmi Ali; M A Ahmed Abdullah; Ponnamperuma Gominda; Vleuten Cees van der
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.