Literature DB >> 31399945

Are online surgical discussion boards a safe and useful venue for surgeons to ask for advice? A review of the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group.

Karla Bernardi1, Alexis N Milton2, William Hope3, John Scott Roth4, Shinil K Shah2, Puja Shah2, Nicole B Lyons2, Alexander C Martin2, Julie L Holihan2, Deepa V Cherla2, Tien C Ko2, Tyler G Hughes5, Mike K Liang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media is a growing medium for disseminating information among surgeons. The International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group (IHC) is a widely utilized social media platform to share ideas and advice on managing patients with hernia-related diseases. Our objective was to assess the safety and utility of advice provided.
METHODS: Overall, 60 consecutive de-identified clinical threads were extracted from the IHC in reverse chronological order. A group of three hernia specialists evaluated all threads for unsafe posts, unhelpful comments, and if an established evidence-based management strategy was provided. Positive and negative controls for safe and unsafe answers were included in seven threads and reviewers were blinded to their presence. Reviewers were free to access all online and professional resources (except the IHC).
RESULTS: There were 598 unique responses (median 10, 1-26 responses per thread) to the 60 clinical threads/scenarios. The review team correctly identified all seven positive and negative controls. Most responses were safe (96.6%) but some were unhelpful (28.4%). For sixteen threads, the reviewers believed there was an established evidence-based answer; however, only six were provided. In addition, 14 responses were considered unsafe, but only four were corrected.
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of responses were considered helpful; however, evidence-based management is typically not provided and unsafe recommendations often go uncontested. While the IHC allows wide dissemination of hernia-related surgical advice/discussions, surgeons should be cautious when using the IHC for clinical advice. Mechanisms to provide evidence-based management strategies and to identify unsafe advice are needed to improve quality within online forums and to prevent patient harm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discussion boards; Online forums; Social media

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31399945     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06895-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Beyond good and evil: exploring medical trainee use of social media.

Authors:  Daniel R George; Michael J Green
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Social Media Use Among Physicians and Trainees: Results of a National Medical Oncology Physician Survey.

Authors:  Rachel Adilman; Yanchini Rajmohan; Edward Brooks; Gloria Roldan Urgoiti; Caroline Chung; Nazik Hammad; Martina Trinkaus; Madiha Naseem; Christine Simmons; Rachel Adilman; Yanchini Rajmohan; Edward Brooks; Gloria Roldan Urgoiti; Caroline Chung; Nazik Hammad; Martina Trinkaus; Madiha Naseem; Christine Simmons
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Ethical Considerations When Using Social Media for Research

Authors:  Marilyn J Hammer
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head.

Authors:  Jim Giles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Pharmaceutical marketing research and the prescribing physician.

Authors:  Jeremy A Greene
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michele P Hamm; Annabritt Chisholm; Jocelyn Shulhan; Andrea Milne; Shannon D Scott; Terry P Klassen; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Social media use in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine C Cheston; Tabor E Flickinger; Margaret S Chisolm
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 8.  Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2011

Review 9.  The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madeline Sterling; Peggy Leung; Drew Wright; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Ethical, legal and professional issues arising from social media coverage by UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services.

Authors:  Sarah Steele; Christopher Adcock; Alistair Steel
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  3 in total

1.  Survey of Social Media Use for Surgical Education During Covid-19.

Authors:  Diego Laurentino Lima; Raquel Nogueira Cordeiro Laurentino Lima; Dyego Benevenuto; Thiers Soares Raymundo; Phillip P Shadduck; Juliana Melo Bianchi; Flavio Malcher
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Diego L Lima; Valentina Viscarret; Juan Velasco; Raquel Nogueira C L Lima; Flavio Malcher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  The Influence of an Online Platform (Hernia U) in Surgical Education and Patient Management.

Authors:  Diego Laurentino Lima; Raquel Nogueira Cordeiro Laurentino Lima; Caroline T Dong; Salvador Morales-Conde; Eduardo Parra Davila; Dalmir Cavalcanti Dos Santos; Flavio Malcher
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.