Literature DB >> 26442986

Efficient Generation of Gene-Modified Pigs Harboring Precise Orthologous Human Mutation via CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Homology-Directed Repair in Zygotes.

Xiaoyang Zhou1, Lulu Wang1, Yinan Du2, Fei Xie1, Liang Li1, Yu Liu1, Chuanhong Liu1, Shiqiang Wang1, Shibing Zhang1, Xingxu Huang2, Yong Wang1, Hong Wei1.   

Abstract

Precise genetic mutation of model animals is highly valuable for functional investigation of human mutations. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9)-induced homology-directed repair (HDR) is usually used for precise genetic mutation, being limited by the relatively low efficiency compared with that of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Although inhibition of NHEJ was shown to enhance HDR-derived mutation, in this work, without inhibition of NHEJ, we first generated gene-modified pigs harboring precise orthologous human mutation (Sox10 c.A325>T) via CRISPR/Cas9-induced HDR in zygotes using single-strand oligo DNA (ssODN) as template with an efficiency as high as 80%, indicating that pig zygotes exhibited high activities of HDR relative to NHEJ and were highly amendable to genetic mutation via CIRSPR/Cas9-induced HDR. Besides, we found a higher concentration of ssODN remarkably reduced HDR-derived mutation in pig zygotes, suggesting a possible balance for optimal HDR-derived mutation in zygotes between the excessive accessibility to HDR templates and the activities of HDR relative to NHEJ which appeared to be negatively correlated to ssODN concentration. In addition, the HDR-derived mutation, as well as those from NHEJ, extensively integrated into various tissues including gonad of founder pig without detected off-targeting, suggesting CRISPR/Cas9-induced HDR in zygotes is a reliable approach for precise genetic mutation in pigs.
© 2015 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; SOX10; disease model; homology-directed repair; model organism; pigs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26442986     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  30 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bhanu P Telugu; Ki-Eun Park; Chi-Hun Park
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Application of the genome editing tool CRISPR/Cas9 in non-human primates.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Min Li; Bing Su
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2016-07-18

4.  Porcine germline genome engineering.

Authors:  Luhan Yang; George Church; Hong-Ye Zhao; Lusheng Huang; Yangbin Gao; Hong-Jiang Wei; Geoffrey Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

6.  Effect of ARTEMIS (DCLRE1C) deficiency and microinjection timing on editing efficiency during somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vitro fertilization using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Yunsheng Li; Malavika K Adur; Wei Wang; R Blythe Schultz; Benjamin Hale; Wesley Wierson; Sara E Charley; Maura McGrail; Jeffrey Essner; Christopher K Tuggle; Jason W Ross
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Efficient Genome Editing in Chicken DF-1 Cells Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System.

Authors:  Yichun Bai; Linjie He; Pengcheng Li; Kun Xu; Simin Shao; Chonghua Ren; Zhongtian Liu; Zehui Wei; Zhiying Zhang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Therapeutic genome editing in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Masataka Nishiga; Lei S Qi; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Directions and applications of CRISPR technology in livestock research.

Authors:  IsmaeI Lamas-Toranzo; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Eva Pericuesta; Pablo Bermejo-Álvarez
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 10.  Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.

Authors:  Fuminori Tanihara; Maki Hirata; Takeshige Otoi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.