Literature DB >> 30541147

Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application.

Jeffrey L Platt1, Marilia Cascalho1, Jorge A Piedrahita2.   

Abstract

For more than a century, transplantation of tissues and organs from animals into man, xenotransplantation, has been viewed as a potential way to treat disease. Ironically, interest in xenotransplantation was fueled especially by successful application of allotransplantation, that is, transplantation of human tissue and organs, as a treatment for a variety of diseases, especially organ failure because scarcity of human tissues limited allotransplantation to a fraction of those who could benefit. In principle, use of animals such as pigs as a source of transplants would allow transplantation to exert a vastly greater impact than allotransplantation on medicine and public health. However, biological barriers to xenotransplantation, including immunity of the recipient, incompatibility of biological systems, and transmission of novel infectious agents, are believed to exceed the barriers to allotransplantation and presently to hinder clinical applications. One way potentially to address the barriers to xenotransplantation is by genetic engineering animal sources. The last 2 decades have brought progressive advances in approaches that can be applied to genetic modification of large animals. Application of these approaches to genetic engineering of pigs has contributed to dramatic improvement in the outcome of experimental xenografts in nonhuman primates and have encouraged the development of a new type of xenograft, a reverse xenograft, in which human stem cells are introduced into pigs under conditions that support differentiation and expansion into functional tissues and potentially organs. These advances make it appropriate to consider the potential limitation of genetic engineering and of current models for advancing the clinical applications of xenotransplantation and reverse xenotransplantation.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive immunity; clinical xenotransplantation; gene editing; innate immunity; molecular incompatibility; nonhuman primate; reverse xenograft; transgenic pig; xenotransplantation; zoonosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30541147      PMCID: PMC6808066          DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ily015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  293 in total

1.  Early recognition of a discordant xenogeneic organ by human circulating lymphocytes.

Authors:  L Inverardi; M Samaja; R Motterlini; F Mangili; J R Bender; R Pardi
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Fusion of approaches to the treatment of organ failure.

Authors:  Brenda Ogle; Marilia Cascalho; Jeffrey L Platt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  The potential hazards of xenotransplantation: an overview.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; S Magre; C Patience
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.181

4.  Postoperative rebound of antiblood type antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection after ABO-incompatible living-related kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Hideki Ishida; Tsunenori Kondo; Tomokazu Shimizu; Taiji Nozaki; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Life-supporting human complement regulator decay accelerating factor transgenic pig liver xenograft maintains the metabolic function and coagulation in the nonhuman primate for up to 8 days.

Authors:  P Ramirez; R Chavez; M Majado; V Munitiz; A Muñoz; Q Hernandez; C G Palenciano; G Pino-Chavez; M Loba; A Minguela; J Yelamos; M R Gago; A S Vizcaino; H Asensi; M G Cayuela; B Segura; F Marin; A Rubio; T Fuente; R Robles; F S Bueno; T Sansano; F Acosta; J M Rodriguez; F Navarro; J Cabezuelo; E Cozzi; D J White; R Y Calne; P Parrilla
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Lack of cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) to transplant recipients and abattoir workers in contact with pigs.

Authors:  Manuel Hermida-Prieto; Nieves Domenech; Isabel Moscoso; Tomas Diaz; Jennifer Ishii; Daniel R Salomon; Rafael Mañez
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  No evidence of pig DNA or retroviral infection in patients with short-term extracorporeal connection to pig kidneys.

Authors:  C Patience; G S Patton; Y Takeuchi; R A Weiss; M O McClure; L Rydberg; M E Breimer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  One-step generation of triple gene-targeted pigs using CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Xianlong Wang; Chunwei Cao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jing Yao; Tang Hai; Qiantao Zheng; Xiao Wang; Hongyong Zhang; Guosong Qin; Jinbo Cheng; Yanfang Wang; Zengqiang Yuan; Qi Zhou; Hongmei Wang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Genotypic variation and outcomes in kidney transplantation: donor and recipient effects.

Authors:  Michael D Gautreaux; Barry I Freedman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Genome-wide association of multiple complex traits in outbred mice by ultra-low-coverage sequencing.

Authors:  Jérôme Nicod; Robert W Davies; Na Cai; Carl Hassett; Leo Goodstadt; Cormac Cosgrove; Benjamin K Yee; Vikte Lionikaite; Rebecca E McIntyre; Carol Ann Remme; Elisabeth M Lodder; Jennifer S Gregory; Tertius Hough; Russell Joynson; Hayley Phelps; Barbara Nell; Clare Rowe; Joe Wood; Alison Walling; Nasrin Bopp; Amarjit Bhomra; Polinka Hernandez-Pliego; Jacques Callebert; Richard M Aspden; Nick P Talbot; Peter A Robbins; Mark Harrison; Martin Fray; Jean-Marie Launay; Yigal M Pinto; David A Blizard; Connie R Bezzina; David J Adams; Paul Franken; Tom Weaver; Sara Wells; Steve D M Brown; Paul K Potter; Paul Klenerman; Arimantas Lionikas; Richard Mott; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation: A New Era.

Authors:  Amber N Carrier; Anjali Verma; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Manuel Pascual; Yannick D Muller; Alban Longchamp; Chandra Bhati; Leo H Buhler; Daniel G Maluf; Raphael P H Meier
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Interspecies chimeras as a platform for exogenic organ production and transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel J Garry; Mary G Garry
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 3.  Genetically Engineered Porcine Organs for Human Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Maryam Shahab; Nihal Ud Din; Nimra Shahab
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 4.  Xenogeneic stem cell transplantation: Research progress and clinical prospects.

Authors:  Lin-Li Jiang; Hui Li; Lei Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.