Literature DB >> 26442136

Complete genome sequence of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93, a novel biomass degrader isolated from obsidian hot spring in Yellowstone National Park.

Phillip J Brumm1, Miriam L Land2, David A Mead1.   

Abstract

Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 was one of several thermophilic organisms isolated from Obsidian Hot Spring, Yellowstone National Park, Montana, USA under permit from the National Park Service. Comparison of 16 S rRNA sequences confirmed the classification of the strain as a G. thermoglucosidasius species. The genome was sequenced, assembled, and annotated by the DOE Joint Genome Institute and deposited at the NCBI in December 2011 (CP002835). The genome of G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 consists of one circular chromosome of 3,893,306 bp and two circular plasmids of 80,849 and 19,638 bp and an average G + C content of 43.93 %. G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 possesses a xylan degradation cluster not found in the other G. thermoglucosidasius sequenced strains. This cluster appears to be related to the xylan degradation cluster found in G. stearothermophilus. G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 possesses two plasmids not found in the other two strains. One plasmid contains a novel gene cluster coding for proteins involved in proline degradation and metabolism, the other contains a collection of mostly hypothetical proteins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass; Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93; Hot springs; Prophage; Xylan

Year:  2015        PMID: 26442136      PMCID: PMC4593210          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0031-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Identification of new organisms that produce biomass-degrading enzymes is of considerable interest. Commercial uses for these enzymes include paper manufacturing, brewing, biomass deconstruction and the production of animal feeds [1-3]. Hot springs, especially those at Yellowstone National Park, have been a source of many new organisms including [4, 5], [6], and [7] that possess enzymes with significant potential in biotechnological applications [8]. As part of a project in conjunction with the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Dept. of Energy, C5-6 Technologies and Lucigen Corp. isolated, characterized, and sequenced a number of new enzyme-producing aerobic organisms from Yellowstone hot springs. species were the most common aerobic organisms isolated during the cultivation of most hot springs samples. species were originally classified as members of the genus , but were reclassified as a separate genus based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, lipid and fatty acid analysis, phenotypic characterization, and DNA–DNA hybridization experiments [9]. species have been isolated from a number of hostile environments including high-temperature oilfields [10], a corroded pipeline in an extremely deep well [11], African [12] and Russian [13] hot springs, marine vents [14], and the Mariana Trench [15], yet they can also be found in garden soils [16] and hay composts [17]. In many cases though, it is unclear if these isolations of species represent vegetative cells growing in these environments or merely spores spread from other locations [18]. The ability of species to thrive in varied and often hostile environments suggests that these species possess enzymes suitable for applications in hostile industrial environments. We therefor sequenced a number of these isolates including C56-YS93 to identify new enzymes suitable for use in biomass conversion into fuels and chemicals.

Organism Information

Classification and Features

C56-YS93 is one of a number of novel thermophilic species isolated from Obsidian Hot Spring, Yellowstone National Park, Montana, USA (44.6100594° latitude and −110.4388217° longitude) under a sampling permit from the National Park Service. The hot spring possesses a pH of 6.37 and a temperature range of 42–90 °C. The organism was isolated from a sample of hot spring water by enrichment and plating on YTP-2 medium (YTP-2 media contains (per liter) 2.0 g yeast extract, 2.0 g tryptone, 2.0 g sodium pyruvate, 1.0 g KCl, 2.0 g KNO3, 2.0 g Na2HPO4.7H2O, 0.1 g MgSO4, 0.03 g CaCl2, and 2.0 ml clarified tomato juice) at 70 °C. The culture is freely available from the Genetic Stock Center (BGSC). Cultures are routinely grown on tryptic soy broth without glucose (TSB) (Difco) media and maintained on TSB agar plates. C5-6 Technologies, Lucigen, the National Park Service, and the Joint Genome Institute have placed no restrictions on the use of the culture or sequence data. C56-YS93, is a gram-positive, rod-shaped facultative anaerobe, (Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S1), with optimum growth temperature of 65 °C and maximum growth temperature of 75 °C. This is similar to the optimum growth temperature reported for TNO-09.020 [19], but significantly higher than reported for previously isolated strains (<60 °C) [9]. C56-YS93 appears to grow as a mixture of single cells and large clumps in liquid culture (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Classification and general features of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 [48]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [49]
Phylum Firmicutes TAS [9]
Class Bacilli TAS [9]
Order Bacillales TAS [9]
Family Bacillaceae TAS [9]
Genus Geobacillus TAS [9]
Species Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius TAS [9]
Strain C56-YS93
Gram stainPositiveIDA
Cell shapeRods and chains of rodsIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationSubterminal sporesIDA
Temperature range55 to 75 °CIDA
Optimum temperature65 °CIDA
pH range; Optimum5.8–8.0; 7.5IDA
Carbon sourceCarbohydrate or proteinIDA
GS-6HabitatHot spring
MIGS-6.3SalinityNot reportedIDA
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementFacultative anaerobeIDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingIDA
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenIDA
MIGS-4Geographic locationObsidian Spring, Yellowstone National Park, USAIDA
MIGS-5Sample collectionSeptember 2003IDA
MIGS-4.1Latitude44.6603028TAS [50]
MIGS-4.2Longitude−110.865194TAS [50]
MIGS-4.4Altitude2416 mTAS [50]

aEvidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [51]

Fig. 1

Micrograph of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 cells showing individual cells and clumps of cells. Cells were grown in TSB plus 0.4 % glucose for 18 h. at 70 °C. A 1.0 ml aliquot was removed, centrifuged, re-suspended in 0.2 ml of sterile water, and stained using a 50 μM solution of SYTO® 9 fluorescent stain in sterile water (Molecular Probes). Dark field fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S epifluorescence microscope at 2000× magnification using a high-pressure Hg light source and a 500 nm emission filter

Classification and general features of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 [48] aEvidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from http://www.geneontology.org/GO.evidence.shtml of the Gene Ontology project [51] Micrograph of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 cells showing individual cells and clumps of cells. Cells were grown in TSB plus 0.4 % glucose for 18 h. at 70 °C. A 1.0 ml aliquot was removed, centrifuged, re-suspended in 0.2 ml of sterile water, and stained using a 50 μM solution of SYTO® 9 fluorescent stain in sterile water (Molecular Probes). Dark field fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S epifluorescence microscope at 2000× magnification using a high-pressure Hg light source and a 500 nm emission filter Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method as detailed in the Material and Methods section. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3014.19) is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The novel sequenced Geobacillus strains are indicated in bold. The type strains of all validly described species are included (NCBI accession numbers): G. caldoxylolyticus ATCC700356T (AF067651), G. galactosidasius CF1BT (AM408559), G. jurassicus DS1T (FN428697), G. kaustophilus NCIMB8547T (X60618), G. lituanicus N-3T (AY044055), G. stearothermophilus R-35646T (FN428694), G. subterraneus 34 T (AF276306), G. thermantarcticus DSM9572T(FR749957), G. thermocatenulatus BGSC93A1T (AY608935), G. thermodenitrificans R-35647T (FN538993), G. thermoglucosidasius BGSC95A1T (FN428685), G. thermoleovoransDSM5366T (Z26923), G. toebii BK-1T (FN428690), G. uzenensis UT (AF276304) and G. vulcani 3S-1T (AJ293805). The 16S rRNA sequence of Paenibacillus lautusJCM9073T (AB073188) was used to root the tree A phylogenetic tree was constructed to identify the relationship of C56-YS93 to other members of the family. The phylogeny of C56-YS93 was determined using its 16S rRNA gene sequence, as well as those of the type strains of all validly described spp. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using MUSCLE [20], pairwise distances were estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and initial trees for heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying the Neighbour-Joining method in MEGA 5 [21]. The alignment and heuristic trees were then used to infer the phylogeny using the Maximum Likelihood method based on Tamura-Nei [22]. The phylogenetic tree confirms the identification of C56-YS93 as a sp. (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method as detailed in the Material and Methods section. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3014.19) is shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The novel sequenced Geobacillus strains are indicated in bold. The type strains of all validly described species are included (NCBI accession numbers): G. caldoxylolyticus ATCC700356T (AF067651), G. galactosidasius CF1BT (AM408559), G. jurassicus DS1T (FN428697), G. kaustophilus NCIMB8547T (X60618), G. lituanicus N-3T (AY044055), G. stearothermophilus R-35646T (FN428694), G. subterraneus 34 T (AF276306), G. thermantarcticus DSM9572T(FR749957), G. thermocatenulatus BGSC93A1T (AY608935), G. thermodenitrificans R-35647T (FN538993), G. thermoglucosidasius BGSC95A1T (FN428685), G. thermoleovoransDSM5366T (Z26923), G. toebii BK-1T (FN428690), G. uzenensis UT (AF276304) and G. vulcani 3S-1T (AJ293805). The 16S rRNA sequence of Paenibacillus lautusJCM9073T (AB073188) was used to root the tree

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

C56-YS93 was selected for sequencing on the basis of its biotechnological potential as part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Genomic Science program (formerly Genomics:GTL). The genome sequence is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [23, 24] (GOLD ID = Gc01858), and in GenBank (NCBI Reference Sequence = CP002835.1). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information and its association with MIGS identifiers is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS 28Libraries used6 and 24 kb
MIGS 29Sequencing platforms454 Titanium, Illumina GAii
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage5.8
MIGS 30AssemblersPhred/Phrap/Consed
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProdigal, GenePRIMP
Locus tagGEOTH
Genbank IDCP002835.1
Genbank date of releaseDec. 1, 2011
GOLD IDGc01858
BIOPROJECTPRJNA40781
MIGS 13Project relevanceBiotechnological
Source material identifierGenome
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

For preparation of genomic DNA, 1 l cultures of C56-YS93 were grown from a single colony in YTP-2 medium at 70 °C in flasks agitated at 200 rpm and collected by centrifugation. Culture stocks were maintained on YTP-2 agar plates grown at 70 °C. The cell concentrate was lysed using a combination of SDS and proteinase K, and genomic DNA was isolated using a phenol/chloroform extraction [25]. The genomic DNA was precipitated, and treated with RNase to remove residual contaminating RNA.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of C56-YS93 was sequenced at the JGI using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies [26]. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 878 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 510–525 bp bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 13 Kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI [27]. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with VELVET [28], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 197.18 MB 454 draft data, and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are consed -a 50–1 350 –g –m –ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 54 contigs in 2 scaffolds. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus and collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment ([29-31] in the following finishing process. Illumina data was used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher (Han, 2006), or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks. A total of 301 additional reactions and 7 shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The total number of reads used in final assembly was 190,696. The overall average error rate of the final assembly was 0.02 errors/10 kb.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [32] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [33]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [33], RNAMMer [34], Rfam [35], TMHMM [36], and signalP [36].

Genome properties

The genome of C56-YS93 consists of one circular chromosome (Table 3 and Fig. 3) of 3,893,306 bp and two circular plasmids of 80,849 and 19,638 bp and an average G + C content of 43.93 % (Table 4). There are 90 tRNA genes, 27 rRNA genes and 4 “other” identified RNA genes. There are 4014 predicted protein-coding regions and 255 pseudogenes in the genome. A total of 2757 genes (66.7 %) have been assigned a predicted function while the rest have been designated as hypothetical proteins (Table 4). The numbers of genes assigned to each COG functional category are listed in Table 5. About 37 % of the annotated genes were not assigned to a COG or have an unknown function.
Table 3

Summary of genome: one chromosome and two plasmids

LabelSize (Mb)TopologyINSDC identifierRefSeq ID
Chromosome3.65CircularCP002050.1NC_14206.1
Plasmid 10.081CircularCP002836.1NC_015665
Plasmid 20.020CircularCP002837.1NC_015661
Fig. 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories) Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories) RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black) GC content, GC skew

Table 4

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Totala
Genome size (bp)3,993,793100
DNA coding (bp)3,437,13186
DNA G+C (bp)1,754,63744
DNA Scaffolds3100
Total genes4,135100
Protein-coding genes4,01497
RNA genes1213
Pseudo genes2556
Genes in internal clusters1,98448
Genes with function prediction1,25730
Genes assigned to COGs2,60763
Genes with Pfam domains3,27879
Genes with signal peptides1614
Genes with transmembrane helices94823
CRISPR repeats6

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValuePercentDescription
J1565.4Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A00RNA processing and modification
K1956.8Transcription
L2087.2Replication, recombination and repair
B10.03Chromatin structure and dynamics
D301.0Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
V441.5Defense mechanisms
T1164.0Signal transduction mechanisms
M1033.6Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N612.1Cell motility
U481.7Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O1003.5Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2077.2Energy production and conversion
G1946.7Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2859.9Amino acid transport and metabolism
F722.5Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1324.6Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1053.6Lipid transport and metabolism
P1605.6Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q712.5Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R33011.5General function prediction only
S2619.1Function unknown
152837.0Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Summary of genome: one chromosome and two plasmids Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories) Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories) RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black) GC content, GC skew Genome statistics aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

To better understand the unique features of C56-YS93, whole genome comparisons were carried out between C56-YS93 and M10EXG (M10EXG) and TNO-09.020 (TNO-09.020) (accession number: NZ_CM001483.1) using RAST genome annotation [37] and SEED curation into subsystems [38]. (The genome sequence of M10EXG is available from the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) database [27, 39].) Basic features of the three genomes are shown in Table 6. Genome comparisons revealed that C56-YS93 possessed a number of unique features.
Table 6

G. thermoglucosidasius strains used in comparisons

G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93M10EXGTNO-09.020
Chromosome size3,993,7933,773,2523,740,238
Plasmids200
Protein coding genes432642284164
Isolation sourceHot Spring, YNP, United StatesSydney, New South Wales, AustraliaDairy production, Netherlands
G. thermoglucosidasius strains used in comparisons

Xylan degradation cluster in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

The most significant unique feature of C56-YS93 is a 26-gene cluster coding for xylan utilization not found in any genome. Included in the cluster are regulatory elements, transporters, intracellular and extracellular xylanases, and enzymes involved in xylose metabolism (Table 7). Manual curation of the cluster indicates that the genes and organization of the C56-YS93 xylan utilization cluster are essentially identical to those of the cluster (Bst T-6) [40]. This identity suggests the cluster may be highly conserved within the xylanolytic geobacilli. No homologs of the corresponding arabinan utilization [41] cluster genes are present in C56-YS93, indicating C56-YS93 is unable to utilize arabinan.
Table 7

Xylan degradation cluster of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

Annotated protein functionC56-YS93Bst T-6
1Integral membrane sensor signal transduction histidine kinaseGeoth_2272xynD
2AraC family transcriptional regulatorGeoth_2271xynC
3Family 1 extracellular solute-binding proteinGeoth_2270xynE
4Binding-protein-dependent transporters inner membrane componentGeoth_2269xynF
5Binding-protein-dependent transporters inner membrane componentGeoth_2268xynG
6Aldose 1-epimeraseGeoth_2267araK
7Polysaccharide deacetylaseGeoth_2266axe1
8Xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidaseGeoth_2265xynB2
9Endo-1,4-beta-xylanaseGeoth_2264xynA2
10Family 1 extracellular solute-binding proteinGeoth_2262aguE
11Binding-protein-dependent transporters inner membrane componentGeoth_2261aguF
12Binding-protein-dependent transporters inner membrane componentGeoth_2260aguG
13Alpha-glucuronidaseGeoth_2259aguA
14Xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidaseGeoth_2258xynB
15PfkB domain-containing proteinGeoth_2257kdgK
162-dehydro-3-deoxyphosphogluconate aldolase/4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolaseGeoth_2256kgdA
17GntR family transcriptional regulatorGeoth_2255uxuR
18Uronate isomeraseGeoth_2254uxaC
19Mannonate dehydrataseGeoth_2253uxuA
20Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase SDRGeoth_2252uxuB
21Hypothetical proteinGeoth_2251orfA
22Endo-1,4-beta-xylanaseGeoth_2250xynA1
23Hypothetical proteinGeoth_2247xynX
24G-D-S-L family lipolytic proteinGeoth_2246axe2
25Xylose isomeraseGeoth_2243xylA
26XylulokinaseGeoth_2242xylB
Xylan degradation cluster of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

Nitrogen clusters in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

C56-YS93 has a number of nitrogen utilization systems. The absence of an arabinan cluster in C56-YS93 is the result of an 11-gene insert (Geoth_2276 through Geoth_2288) coding for a peptide utilization cluster that replaces part of the arabinan cluster. The cluster does not code for a secreted protease or peptidase, but contains an annotated five-gene ABC peptide transporter system and two intracellular peptidases. Downstream from the peptide utilization cluster is a 12-gene urea uptake and utilization cluster (Geoth_2301 through Geoth_2312). The organism contains clusters for reduction of nitrate to nitrite (Geoth_2197 through Geoth_2200) and reduction of nitrite to dintrogen (Geoth_3084 through Geoth_3090).

Presence of plasmids in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

While the genomes of strains TNO-09.020 and M10EXG contain no plasmids, the genome of C56-YS93 includes two plasmids, one of approximately 81 Kb and one of approximately 20 Kb. The 20 Kb plasmid contains genes coding for a number of small hypothetical proteins with no identifiable function. Among the annotated proteins, the 20Kb plasmid contains an annotated P4 phage/plasmid primase with no close homologs in other strains (Geoth_0020) and an annotated ArpU family phage transcriptional regulator (Geoth_0016). The 20 Kb plasmid contains an annotated transcriptional modulator of MazE/toxin, MazF (Geoth_0007) that may function in maintaining the plasmid. The 80 Kb plasmid contains a gene cluster that may function for proline and hydroxyproline capture, transport and metabolism. The cluster includes two peptidases (Geoth_3970 and Geoth_3979), a transport system and hydroxyglutarate oxidase cluster (Geoth_4004 and Geoth_3999), four annotated oxoprolinases (Geoth_3972, Geoth_3973, Geoth_3984, and Geoth_3987), and a hydantoin racemase (Geoth_3976) The plasmid also contains genes coding for proteins that metabolize proline to glutamate via proline dehydrogenase. (Geoth_3968 and Geoth_3969). BLAST analysis indicates that these two proteins are not common to species, but appear to have been acquired from an species. In addition, the 80 kb plasmid contains genes coding for eight proteins annotated as integrase or transposon-related and annotated death-on-curing and addiction module antidote proteins (Geoth_4023 and Geoth_4024) that may function in maintaining the plasmid.

Prophage insert in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93

Prophage analysis of the C56-YS93 genome was performed using PHAST genome search software [42]. PHAST identified a 56 KB insert containing an intact prophage between 735,196 and 780,775 bp. The insert contains 75 genes, of which 51 are annotated as having a phage origin, 20 are annotated as hypothetical proteins and four are annotated as bacterial (Fig. 4). BLAST analysis indicates the phage proteins in the insert most closely match those of virus E2 (Accession: NC_009552.2) with 26 protein hits.
Fig. 4

Prophage genes identified in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 using PHAST genome search software

Prophage genes identified in G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 using PHAST genome search software

Conclusions

species were first isolated by Suzuki and given the name [43]. The organisms were reclassified as and their name corrected to thermoglucosidasius [9]. C56-YS93 is the first strain from a hot spring environment for which a whole genome sequence is available. While it is possible that C56-YS93 was present only as wind-blown spores in the hot spring [18], there are a number of strong arguments for the growth of this and other species in hot springs. The first and most compelling argument is that, in our lab, boiled samples of Obsidian hot spring water resulted in isolation of no viable organisms, either in liquid culture or by plating. If spores were present in a significant quantity, a significant number of isolates would be expected. Secondly, we have been able to isolate species only from alkaline or neutral hot springs with temperatures between 60 and 80 °C, essentially the environment in which species can grow. No species were isolated from acidic hot springs located close to the alkaline and neutral springs. The isolation of wind-borne spore cultures would predict equal numbers of species isolated from acidic and alkaline springs. Thirdly, in our work, species and species were the predominant organisms isolated from Yellowstone hot springs under aerobic conditions. species share temperature and pH optima with species. species do not sporulate, so the presence of species cannot be attributed to wind-blown spores, but indicates the organism is growing in the hot spring. If these hot springs support growth of species, it would be difficult to argue that the hot springs can support growth of species but cannot support growth of with species. Finally, species have been isolated from microbial mats from other hot springs in Yellowstone [44]. , C56-YS93, appears to have a number of unique features as a result of its growth in the hot spring environment. The organism possesses a large xylan degradation cluster that increases the substrate range of this strain relative to the other two sequenced strains. A number of other biomass-degrading organisms have been identified in Obsidian Hot Spring [45], but this is the first reported biomass-degrading species from the hot spring. The organization of this cluster appears to match the glucuronic acid utilization cluster described for [40], suggesting this cluster may be conserved in other species. C56-YS93 possesses both chromosomal and plasmid-borne peptide utilization clusters that may allow the organism to scavenge proteins and peptides from the medium. C56-YS93 also possesses the ability to reduce nitrate to dinitrogen, possibly utilizing nitrate as an alternate electron acceptor in the oxygen-poor high temperature environment. Genetic exchange with other species in the hot spring may be facilitated by the presence of the two plasmids not found in the other two strains. Further work is needed to identify the function of the genes present on these two plasmids and clarify the role they play in survival in the hot spring. Metagenomic analysis of samples from two other hot springs in Yellowstone National Park, Bear Paw and Octopus, shows the presence of active archaeal and bacterial phage populations [46, 47]. The prophage identified in C56-YS93 (43.9 % G + C) is unrelated to the prophages identified in species Y412MC52 and Y412MC61 (52.3 % G + C), isolated from the same hot spring. This suggests that the identified prophage identified in C56-YS93 may be specific to , or to the lower G + C species. Additional work is needed to understand the relationship between species and the phages that infect them.
  49 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Microbiology and geochemistry of great boiling and mud hot springs in the United States Great Basin.

Authors:  Kyle C Costa; Jason B Navarro; Everett L Shock; Chuanlun L Zhang; Debbie Soukup; Brian P Hedlund
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The value of basic research: discovery of Thermus aquaticus and other extreme thermophiles.

Authors:  T D Brock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Thermus aquaticus gen. n. and sp. n., a nonsporulating extreme thermophile.

Authors:  T D Brock; H Freeze
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Bacillus thermoglucosidasius sp. nov., a New Species of Obligately Thermophilic Bacilli.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; T Kishigami; K Inoue; Y Mizoguchi; N Eto; M Takagi; S Abe
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  PHAST: a fast phage search tool.

Authors:  You Zhou; Yongjie Liang; Karlene H Lynch; Jonathan J Dennis; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Frank Korzeniewski; Krishna Palaniappan; Ernest Szeto; Greg Werner; Anu Padki; Xueling Zhao; Inna Dubchak; Philip Hugenholtz; Iain Anderson; Athanasios Lykidis; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of Target Gene Silencing on Calcite Single Crystal Formation by Thermophilic Bacterium Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NY05.

Authors:  Rie Murai; Keiji Kiyoshi; Naoto Yoshida
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Genomic Analysis Provides New Insights Into Biotechnological and Industrial Potential of Parageobacillus thermantarcticus M1.

Authors:  Songul Yasar Yildiz; Ilaria Finore; Luigi Leone; Ida Romano; Licia Lama; Ceyda Kasavi; Barbara Nicolaus; Ebru Toksoy Oner; Annarita Poli
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Genetic toolbox for controlled expression of functional proteins in Geobacillus spp.

Authors:  Ivan Pogrebnyakov; Christian Bille Jendresen; Alex Toftgaard Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genome-Centric Analysis of a Thermophilic and Cellulolytic Bacterial Consortium Derived from Composting.

Authors:  Leandro N Lemos; Roberta V Pereira; Ronaldo B Quaggio; Layla F Martins; Livia M S Moura; Amanda R da Silva; Luciana P Antunes; Aline M da Silva; João C Setubal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Draft Genome Sequence of Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius Strain TG4, a Hydrogenogenic Carboxydotrophic Bacterium Isolated from a Marine Sediment.

Authors:  Masao Inoue; Ayumi Tanimura; Yusuke Ogami; Taiki Hino; Suguru Okunishi; Hiroto Maeda; Takashi Yoshida; Yoshihiko Sako
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2019-01-31

6.  Inhibition of extracellular proteases improves the production of a xylanase in Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius.

Authors:  Alexandria T N Holland; Michael J Danson; Albert Bolhuis
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.563

7.  Effect of Cultural Conditions on Protease Production by a Thermophilic Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius SKF4 Isolated from Sungai Klah Hot Spring Park, Malaysia.

Authors:  Allison D Suleiman; Nor'Aini Abdul Rahman; Hidayat Mohd Yusof; Fairolniza Mohd Shariff; Nur Adeela Yasid
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Microbial diversity of thermophiles with biomass deconstruction potential in a foliage-rich hot spring.

Authors:  Li Sin Lee; Kian Mau Goh; Chia Sing Chan; Geok Yuan Annie Tan; Wai-Fong Yin; Chun Shiong Chong; Kok-Gan Chan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.139

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.