Literature DB >> 26433485

Evaluation of the Illumina(®) Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling.

Jennifer D Churchill1, Sarah E Schmedes2, Jonathan L King2, Bruce Budowle3.   

Abstract

While capillary electrophoresis-based technologies have been the mainstay for human identity typing applications, there are limitations with this methodology's resolution, scalability, and throughput. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) offers the capability to multiplex multiple types of forensically-relevant markers and multiple samples together in one run all at an overall lower cost per nucleotide than traditional capillary electrophoresis-based methods; thus, addressing some of these limitations. MPS also is poised to expand forensic typing capabilities by providing new strategies for mixture deconvolution with the identification of intra-STR allele sequence variants and the potential to generate new types of investigative leads with an increase in the overall number and types of genetic markers being analyzed. The beta version of the Illumina ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit is a MPS library preparation method with a streamlined workflow that allows for targeted amplification and sequencing of 63 STRs and 95 identity SNPs, with the option to include an additional 56 ancestry SNPs and 22 phenotypic SNPs depending on the primer mix chosen for amplification, on the MiSeq desktop sequencer (Illumina). This study was divided into a series of experiments that evaluated reliability, sensitivity of detection, mixture analysis, concordance, and the ability to analyze challenged samples. Genotype accuracy, depth of coverage, and allele balance were used as informative metrics for the quality of the data produced. The ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit produced reliable, reproducible results and obtained full profiles with DNA input amounts of 1ng. Data were found to be concordant with current capillary electrophoresis methods, and mixtures at a 1:19 ratio were resolved accurately. Data from the challenged samples showed concordant results with current DNA typing methods with markers in common and minimal allele drop out from the large number of markers typed on these samples. This set of experiments indicates the beta version of the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit is a valid tool for forensic DNA typing and warrants full validation studies of this MPS technology.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ForenSeq; Illumina MiSeq; Massively parallel sequencing (MPS); SNPs; STRs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433485     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  39 in total

Review 1.  The Y chromosomes of the great apes.

Authors:  Pille Hallast; Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  As solid as a rock-comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of the petrosal bone as a source of DNA for forensic identification of challenging cranial bones.

Authors:  Galina Kulstein; Thorsten Hadrys; Peter Wiegand
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Comparison between magnetic bead and qPCR library normalisation methods for forensic MPS genotyping.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Samantha Venables; Paul Roffey
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  A panel of 130 autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms for ancestry assignment in five Asian populations and in Caucasians.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Chih-Peng Lin; Tsun-Ying Huang; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Wei-Hsin Hsieh; Chun-Yen Lin; Hsiang-I Yin; Li-Hui Tseng; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 5.  Increasing the reach of forensic genetics with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Sarah E Schmedes; Frank R Wendt
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 6.  Forensically relevant SNaPshot® assays for human DNA SNP analysis: a review.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Runa Daniel; Chris Phillips; Dennis McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  A preliminary assessment of the ForenSeq™ FGx System: next generation sequencing of an STR and SNP multiplex.

Authors:  Ashley L Silvia; Nathan Shugarts; Jenifer Smith
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Case report: on the use of the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Ancestry Panel in a real forensic case.

Authors:  C Hollard; C Keyser; T Delabarde; A Gonzalez; C Vilela Lamego; V Zvénigorosky; B Ludes
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Effects of the Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ sequencing chemistry on sequence data quality.

Authors:  Jennifer D Churchill; Jonathan L King; Ranajit Chakraborty; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Empirical testing of a 23-AIMs panel of SNPs for ancestry evaluations in four major US populations.

Authors:  Xiangpei Zeng; David H Warshauer; Jonathan L King; Jennifer D Churchill; Ranajit Chakraborty; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.