Literature DB >> 27785563

A preliminary assessment of the ForenSeq™ FGx System: next generation sequencing of an STR and SNP multiplex.

Ashley L Silvia1, Nathan Shugarts2, Jenifer Smith2.   

Abstract

The ForenSeq™ FGx System (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was initially evaluated in concordance with SWGDAM guidelines for internal validation to determine the quality of the system's components: the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit reagents, the MiSeq FGx™ instrument, and the ForenSeq™ Universal Analysis Software, for the analysis of targeted, forensically informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and short tandem repeats (STRs). This multiplex consisted of STRs (autosomal, X, and Y) and SNPs (identity, ancestry, and phenotypic) that were run using one preparation process. Overall, the ForenSeq™ FGx System performed as well as the traditional capillary electrophoresis-based method in producing usable profile information, along with additional information that could aid in investigative leads. The MiSeq FGx™ System was validated using DNA samples in studies testing reproducibility, repeatability, concordance, sensitivity, and mock case single donor samples. Overall, genotyping results for STRs and SNPs were concordant with the profiles generated from conventional STR analysis using Identifiler and SNPs typed by 23andMe analysis. Genotypes of the ForenSeq™ aSNPs were used to evaluate biogeographical ancestry estimations using ForenSeq™ Universal Analysis Software, FROG-kb database (KIDD aiSNP 55 panel), and 23andMe. The system was shown to provide reproducible genotypes and reliable results were obtained at levels as low as 50 pg. All mock case samples were concordant with the donor profile. The results support consideration of the ForenSeq™ FGx System as an acceptable alternative to current STR and SNP analysis, pending formal developmental and internal validation studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic; MiSeq FGx™; SNP analysis; STR analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27785563     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1457-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  21 in total

1.  Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.

Authors:  T R Moretti; A L Baumstark; D A Defenbaugh; K M Keys; J B Smerick; B Budowle
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations.

Authors:  B Budowle; B Shea; S Niezgoda; R Chakraborty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  A comparison between SNaPshot, pyrosequencing, and biplex invader SNP genotyping methods: accuracy, cost, and throughput.

Authors:  Nirupma Pati; Valerie Schowinsky; Obrad Kokanovic; Victoria Magnuson; Soumitra Ghosh
Journal:  J Biochem Biophys Methods       Date:  2004-07-30

4.  A comparison of the effects of PCR inhibition in quantitative PCR and forensic STR analysis.

Authors:  Maribel E Funes-Huacca; Kerry Opel; Robyn Thompson; Bruce R McCord
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics.

Authors:  Claus Børsting; Niels Morling
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Developmental validation of the IrisPlex system: determination of blue and brown iris colour for forensic intelligence.

Authors:  Susan Walsh; Alexander Lindenbergh; Sofia B Zuniga; Titia Sijen; Peter de Knijff; Manfred Kayser; Kaye N Ballantyne
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Validation and population studies of the loci LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, and Gc (PM loci), and HLA-DQ alpha using a multiplex amplification and typing procedure.

Authors:  B Budowle; J A Lindsey; J A DeCou; B W Koons; A M Giusti; C T Comey
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 8.  Forensically relevant SNP classes.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Introducing the Forensic Research/Reference on Genetics knowledge base, FROG-kb.

Authors:  Haseena Rajeevan; Usha Soundararajan; Andrew J Pakstis; Kenneth K Kidd
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2012-09-01

10.  Inference of human continental origin and admixture proportions using a highly discriminative ancestry informative 41-SNP panel.

Authors:  Caroline M Nievergelt; Adam X Maihofer; Tatyana Shekhtman; Ondrej Libiger; Xudong Wang; Kenneth K Kidd; Judith R Kidd
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2013-07-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison between magnetic bead and qPCR library normalisation methods for forensic MPS genotyping.

Authors:  Bhavik Mehta; Samantha Venables; Paul Roffey
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Massively parallel sequencing analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures using the ForenSeq™ system in combination with EuroForMix software.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Ming-Yih Wu; Wan-Chia Chung; Tsang-Ming Ko; Chih-Peng Lin; Hsiang-I Yin; Tsui-Ting Lee; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of Illumina's forensic STR and SNP kits on MiSeq FGx™.

Authors:  Vishakha Sharma; Hoi Yan Chow; Donald Siegel; Elisa Wurmbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Investigation of the STR loci noise distributions of PowerSeq™ Auto System.

Authors:  Xiangpei Zeng; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 5.  Massive parallel sequencing in forensics: advantages, issues, technicalities, and prospects.

Authors:  David Ballard; Jakub Winkler-Galicki; Joanna Wesoły
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example.

Authors:  Petra Hölzl-Müller; Martin Bodner; Burkhard Berger; Walther Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Identification of sequence polymorphisms at 58 STRs and 94 iiSNPs in a Tibetan population using massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Dan Peng; Yinming Zhang; Han Ren; Haixia Li; Ran Li; Xuefeng Shen; Nana Wang; Erwen Huang; Riga Wu; Hongyu Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: A review.

Authors:  Brigitte Bruijns; Roald Tiggelaar; Han Gardeniers
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Sequencing of 231 forensic genetic markers using the MiSeq FGx™ forensic genomics system - an evaluation of the assay and software.

Authors:  Christian Hussing; Christina Huber; Rajmonda Bytyci; Helle S Mogensen; Niels Morling; Claus Børsting
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-04-09

10.  Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance, concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA.

Authors:  Petra Müller; Christian Sell; Thorsten Hadrys; Johannes Hedman; Steffi Bredemeyer; Francois-Xavier Laurent; Lutz Roewer; Sabrina Achtruth; Maja Sidstedt; Titia Sijen; Marc Trimborn; Natalie Weiler; Sascha Willuweit; Ingo Bastisch; Walther Parson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.