Literature DB >> 26433469

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals.

Gian Carlo Di Renzo1, Jeanne A Conry2, Jennifer Blake3, Mark S DeFrancesco2, Nathaniel DeNicola2, James N Martin2, Kelly A McCue2, David Richmond4, Abid Shah4, Patrice Sutton5, Tracey J Woodruff6, Sheryl Ziemin van der Poel7, Linda C Giudice8.   

Abstract

Exposure to toxic environmental chemicals during pregnancy and breastfeeding is ubiquitous and is a threat to healthy human reproduction. There are tens of thousands of chemicals in global commerce, and even small exposures to toxic chemicals during pregnancy can trigger adverse health consequences. Exposure to toxic environmental chemicals and related health outcomes are inequitably distributed within and between countries; universally, the consequences of exposure are disproportionately borne by people with low incomes. Discrimination, other social factors, economic factors, and occupation impact risk of exposure and harm. Documented links between prenatal exposure to environmental chemicals and adverse health outcomes span the life course and include impacts on fertility and pregnancy, neurodevelopment, and cancer. The global health and economic burden related to toxic environmental chemicals is in excess of millions of deaths and billions of dollars every year. On the basis of accumulating robust evidence of exposures and adverse health impacts related to toxic environmental chemicals, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) joins other leading reproductive health professional societies in calling for timely action to prevent harm. FIGO recommends that reproductive and other health professionals advocate for policies to prevent exposure to toxic environmental chemicals, work to ensure a healthy food system for all, make environmental health part of health care, and champion environmental justice.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental health; Environmental chemicals; Reproductive environmental health; Toxic chemicals; Women's health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433469      PMCID: PMC6663094          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  85 in total

Review 1.  Environment and contaminants in traditional food systems of northern indigenous peoples.

Authors:  H V Kuhnlein; H M Chan
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 2.  Environmental factors in infertility.

Authors:  K S Hruska; P A Furth; D B Seifer; F I Sharara; J A Flaws
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study.

Authors:  Helen Klip; Janneke Verloop; Jan D van Gool; Marlies E T A Koster; Curt W Burger; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Fetal programming of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  David J P Barker
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.015

5.  Decreased human semen quality and organochlorine compounds in blood.

Authors:  Jan W Dallinga; Edwin J C Moonen; John C M Dumoulin; Johannes L H Evers; Joep P M Geraedts; Jos C S Kleinjans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models.

Authors:  D Rice; S Barone
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  An assessment of the cord blood:maternal blood methylmercury ratio: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Alan H Stern; Andrew E Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Low birth weight and residential proximity to PCB-contaminated waste sites.

Authors:  Akerke Baibergenova; Rustam Kudyakov; Michael Zdeb; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Chemical contaminants in breast milk: time trends and regional variability.

Authors:  Gina M Solomon; Pilar M Weiss
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  In utero exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and duration of human pregnancy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Latini; Claudio De Felice; Giuseppe Presta; Antonio Del Vecchio; Irma Paris; Fabrizio Ruggieri; Pietro Mazzeo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  80 in total

1.  Report from the 2016 University of California, San Francisco, Center for Reproductive Sciences retreat.

Authors:  Paolo F Rinaudo; Marco Conti
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.609

2.  Assessment of environmental knowledge and needs among assisted reproductive technology professionals.

Authors:  Annick Delvigne; Jean Vandromme
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Examining Joint Effects of Air Pollution Exposure and Social Determinants of Health in Defining "At-Risk" Populations Under the Clean Air Act: Susceptibility of Pregnant Women to Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  World Med Health Policy       Date:  2018-03-12

Review 4.  Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than 'sound science', should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Laura N Vandenberg; Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; John Peterson Myers; Remy Slama; Frederick Vom Saal; Robert Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Association of birth outcomes with fetal exposure to parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in an immigrant population in Brooklyn, New York.

Authors:  Laura A Geer; Benny F G Pycke; Joshua Waxenbaum; David M Sherer; Ovadia Abulafia; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern.

Authors:  Ami R Zota; Bhavna Shamasunder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Food Additives and Child Health.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Rachel M Shaffer; Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Food Additives and Child Health.

Authors:  Leonardo Trasande; Rachel M Shaffer; Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Heightened susceptibility: A review of how pregnancy and chemical exposures influence maternal health.

Authors:  Julia Varshavsky; Anna Smith; Aolin Wang; Elizabeth Hom; Monika Izano; Hongtai Huang; Amy Padula; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.143

10.  Childhood Leukemia: A Preventable Disease.

Authors:  Catherine Metayer; Gary Dahl; Joe Wiemels; Mark Miller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.