Annick Delvigne1, Jean Vandromme2. 1. ART center, Clinique CHC MontLégia, Liège, Belgium. Annick.delvigne@CHC.be. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Saint Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Exposure to environmental contaminants is to be taken into account in preventive healthcare in general and particularly in the field of reproduction according to the increasing amount of evidence data being published. The aim of this study is to evaluate the practices and interest in and basic knowledge of environmental health, by the professionals of the ART process: doctor, embryologist, and nurses. METHODS: Survey among 12 Belgian assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 67%: 43.5% of the ART professionals do bring up the topic of environmental contaminants with their patients, without significant differences among types of professionals. Ninety percent of respondents believe that it would be useful, and 63% mention their lack of knowledge and the absence of solutions (20.5%) to explain their inaction. Lack of knowledge is much greater for nurses respectively (85%) compared with doctors (52%) and biologists (54%). The most popular means toward improving their knowledge is scientific seminars (69%). The questionnaire to evaluate the health professional knowledge gives 56% of adequate replies. The topic concerning eating habits obtains a very bad score of knowledge. When looking at exposure to occupational risks, 75% of the answers were correct. CONCLUSIONS: The place of ART before conception makes it an ideal entry point for the prevention of environmental hazards. This study corroborates the previous observations which underline the importance to reinforce the concepts of environmental health in the initial and continuous training of health professionals.
PURPOSE: Exposure to environmental contaminants is to be taken into account in preventive healthcare in general and particularly in the field of reproduction according to the increasing amount of evidence data being published. The aim of this study is to evaluate the practices and interest in and basic knowledge of environmental health, by the professionals of the ART process: doctor, embryologist, and nurses. METHODS: Survey among 12 Belgian assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 67%: 43.5% of the ART professionals do bring up the topic of environmental contaminants with their patients, without significant differences among types of professionals. Ninety percent of respondents believe that it would be useful, and 63% mention their lack of knowledge and the absence of solutions (20.5%) to explain their inaction. Lack of knowledge is much greater for nurses respectively (85%) compared with doctors (52%) and biologists (54%). The most popular means toward improving their knowledge is scientific seminars (69%). The questionnaire to evaluate the health professional knowledge gives 56% of adequate replies. The topic concerning eating habits obtains a very bad score of knowledge. When looking at exposure to occupational risks, 75% of the answers were correct. CONCLUSIONS: The place of ART before conception makes it an ideal entry point for the prevention of environmental hazards. This study corroborates the previous observations which underline the importance to reinforce the concepts of environmental health in the initial and continuous training of health professionals.
Entities:
Keywords:
ART; Environmental health; Preventive attitude; Reproductive health
Authors: Patrice Sutton; Tracey J Woodruff; Joanne Perron; Naomi Stotland; Jeanne A Conry; Mark D Miller; Linda C Giudice Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Robert N Hoover; Marianne Hyer; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Ervin Adam; Brian Bond; Andrea L Cheville; Theodore Colton; Patricia Hartge; Elizabeth E Hatch; Arthur L Herbst; Beth Y Karlan; Raymond Kaufman; Kenneth L Noller; Julie R Palmer; Stanley J Robboy; Robert C Saal; William Strohsnitter; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Rebecca Troisi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jerrold J Heindel; John Balbus; Linda Birnbaum; Marie Noel Brune-Drisse; Philippe Grandjean; Kimberly Gray; Philip J Landrigan; Peter D Sly; William Suk; Deborah Cory Slechta; Claudia Thompson; Mark Hanson Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Cécile Marie; Didier Lémery; Françoise Vendittelli; Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Raphaëlle Teysseire; Patrick Brochard; Loïc Sentilhes; Fleur Delva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: C De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; C Wyns; E Mocanu; T Motrenko; G Scaravelli; J Smeenk; S Vidakovic; V Goossens Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2020-02-24