Hugo Bouchard1, Yuji Kamio2, Hugo Palmans3, Jan Seuntjens4, Simon Duane1. 1. Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Team, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom. 2. Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1560 Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, Québec H2L 4M1, Canada. 3. Acoustics and Ionising Radiation Team, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United KingdomMedical Physics, EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt A-2700, Austria. 4. Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3G 1A4, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify detector perturbation effects in megavoltage small photon fields and support the theoretical explanation on the nature of quality correction factors in these conditions. METHODS: In this second paper, a modern approach to radiation dosimetry is defined for any detector and applied to small photon fields. Fano's theorem is adapted in the form of a cavity theory and applied in the context of nonstandard beams to express four main effects in the form of perturbation factors. The pencil-beam decomposition method is detailed and adapted to the calculation of perturbation factors and quality correction factors. The approach defines a perturbation function which, for a given field size or beam modulation, entirely determines these dosimetric factors. Monte Carlo calculations are performed in different cavity sizes for different detection materials, electron densities, and extracameral components. RESULTS: Perturbation effects are detailed with calculated perturbation functions, showing the relative magnitude of the effects as well as the geometrical extent to which collimating or modulating the beam impacts the dosimetric factors. The existence of a perturbation zone around the detector cavity is demonstrated and the approach is discussed and linked to previous approaches in the literature to determine critical field sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Monte Carlo simulations are valuable to describe pencil beam perturbation effects and detail the nature of dosimetric factors in megavoltage small photon fields. In practice, it is shown that dosimetric factors could be avoided if the field size remains larger than the detector perturbation zone. However, given a detector and beam quality, a full account for the detector geometry is necessary to determine critical field sizes.
PURPOSE: To quantify detector perturbation effects in megavoltage small photon fields and support the theoretical explanation on the nature of quality correction factors in these conditions. METHODS: In this second paper, a modern approach to radiation dosimetry is defined for any detector and applied to small photon fields. Fano's theorem is adapted in the form of a cavity theory and applied in the context of nonstandard beams to express four main effects in the form of perturbation factors. The pencil-beam decomposition method is detailed and adapted to the calculation of perturbation factors and quality correction factors. The approach defines a perturbation function which, for a given field size or beam modulation, entirely determines these dosimetric factors. Monte Carlo calculations are performed in different cavity sizes for different detection materials, electron densities, and extracameral components. RESULTS: Perturbation effects are detailed with calculated perturbation functions, showing the relative magnitude of the effects as well as the geometrical extent to which collimating or modulating the beam impacts the dosimetric factors. The existence of a perturbation zone around the detector cavity is demonstrated and the approach is discussed and linked to previous approaches in the literature to determine critical field sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Monte Carlo simulations are valuable to describe pencil beam perturbation effects and detail the nature of dosimetric factors in megavoltage small photon fields. In practice, it is shown that dosimetric factors could be avoided if the field size remains larger than the detector perturbation zone. However, given a detector and beam quality, a full account for the detector geometry is necessary to determine critical field sizes.
Authors: Mohammad Obeidat; Kristen A McConnell; Xiaolei Li; Brian Bui; Sotirios Stathakis; Niko Papanikolaou; Karl Rasmussen; Chul Soo Ha; Sang Eun Lee; Eun Yong Shim; Neil Kirby Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Per H Halvorsen; Eileen Cirino; Indra J Das; Jeffrey A Garrett; Jun Yang; Fang-Fang Yin; Lynne A Fairobent Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Khalsa Al Shukaili; Stéphanie Corde; Marco Petasecca; Vladimir Pereveratylo; Michael Lerch; Michael Jackson; Anatoly Rosenfeld Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Wolfgang Lechner; Paulina Wesolowska; Godfrey Azangwe; Mehenna Arib; Victor Gabriel Leandro Alves; Luo Suming; Daniela Ekendahl; Wojciech Bulski; José Luis Alonso Samper; Sumanth Panyam Vinatha; Srimanoroth Siri; Milan Tomsej; Mikko Tenhunen; Julie Povall; Stephen F Kry; David S Followill; David I Thwaites; Dietmar Georg; Joanna Izewska Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-03-06
Authors: Carolin Weber; Rafael Kranzer; Jan Weidner; Kevin Kröninger; Björn Poppe; Hui Khee Looe; Daniela Poppinga Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 4.071