Literature DB >> 35833953

Simulated practice effects on the transfer and retention of gait sequences from the upper to the lower extremity.

Mohammad R Saeedpour-Parizi1,2, Surabhi Shripad Date3, Luis Dominguez3, Tayebeh Baniasadi3, John B Shea3.   

Abstract

This study investigated transfer of training from upper extremity limbs (the index fingers) to the lower extremity limbs (the legs) for performance of three gait sequences of different difficulty. Fifteen subjects participated in the study. Subjects in an iPad training group practiced by sequentially moving their left-and right-hand index fingers across tiles to each of three targets displayed on an iPad for 20 trials. Subjects in a gait training group practiced by sequentially walking across tiles to each of the 3 targets displayed on a screen for 20 trials. A no practice group did not receive practice trials. Immediately following practice of each level of difficulty, a transfer test (20 trials) was given for which subjects walked to the target just practiced. A retention test of 36 trials (12 trials at each difficulty level) was administered 20 min following performance of the last transfer test trial. The retention test showed that reaction times were shorter for the iPad training than gait training and no training groups; anticipatory postural adjustment times were equivalent for the iPad and gait training groups, but shorter than for the no training group; and movement times were shorter for the iPad training group than for the gait training and no training groups. These results suggest that iPad training (upper extremity) followed by performance of gait training (lower extremity) had greater benefits for learning (as measured by the delayed retention test) the gait sequences than practicing the actual gait sequences themselves.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipatory postural adjustment; Gait training; Movement time; Reaction time; Retention; Transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35833953     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06410-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  13 in total

1.  Pupil diameter as a biomarker of effort in goal-directed gait.

Authors:  Mohammad R Saeedpour-Parizi; Shirin E Hassan; John B Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Probing attention prioritization during dual-task step initiation: a novel method.

Authors:  Ruopeng Sun; John B Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions.

Authors:  Amaris K Balitsky Thompson; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Learning new gait patterns: Age-related differences in skill acquisition and interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Edward P Washabaugh; Courtney E Reid; Matteo M Althoen; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.032

9.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.