Literature DB >> 26418830

Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry with Almost Perfect Charge Accuracy.

David Z Keifer1, Deven L Shinholt1, Martin F Jarrold1.   

Abstract

Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) is a single-particle technique where the masses of individual ions are determined from simultaneous measurement of each ion's mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and charge. CDMS has many desirable features: it has no upper mass limit, no mass discrimination, and it can analyze complex mixtures. However, the charge is measured directly, and the poor accuracy of the charge measurement has severely limited the mass resolution achievable with CDMS. Since the charge is quantized, it needs to be measured with sufficient accuracy to assign each ion to its correct charge state. This goal has now been largely achieved. By reducing the pressure to extend the trapping time and by implementing a novel analysis method that improves the signal-to-noise ratio and compensates for imperfections in the charge measurement, the uncertainty has been reduced to less than 0.20 e rmsd (root-mean-square deviation). With this unprecedented precision peaks due to different charge states are resolved in the charge spectrum. Further improvement can be achieved by quantizing the charge (rounding the measured charge to the nearest integer) and culling ions with measured charges midway between the integral values. After ions with charges more than one standard deviation from the mean are culled, the fraction of ions assigned to the wrong charge state is estimated to be 6.4 × 10(-5) (i.e., less than 1 in 15 000). Since almost all remaining ions are assigned to their correct charge state, the uncertainty in the mass is now almost entirely limited by the uncertainty in the m/z measurement.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26418830     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  27 in total

1.  Spontaneous Mass and Charge Losses from Single Multi-Megadalton Ions Studied by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Andrew W Alexander; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry Measurements of Exosomes and other Extracellular Particles Enriched from Bovine Milk.

Authors:  Brooke A Brown; Xuyao Zeng; Aaron R Todd; Lauren F Barnes; Jonathan M A Winstone; Jonathan C Trinidad; Milos V Novotny; Martin F Jarrold; David E Clemmer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Effects of Individual Ion Energies on Charge Measurements in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry (FT-CDMS).

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Conner C Harper; Haw-Wei Lin; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Single Particle Analyzer of Mass: A Charge Detection Mass Spectrometer with a Multi-Detector Electrostatic Ion Trap.

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Samuel I Merenbloom; Satrajit Chakrabarty; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Ion-Ion Interactions in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel Y Botamanenko; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry Enhances the Sensitivity and Sequence Coverage of Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jared O Kafader; Kenneth R Durbin; Rafael D Melani; Benjamin J Des Soye; Luis F Schachner; Michael W Senko; Philip D Compton; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Optimized Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap for Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Joanna A Hogan; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Enhanced Multiplexing in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry by Decoupling Ion Frequency from Mass to Charge Ratio.

Authors:  Conner C Harper; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Staying Alive: Measuring Intact Viable Microbes with Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Erica Forsberg; Mingliang Fang; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Measurement of the accurate mass of a 50 MDa infectious virus.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Tina Motwani; Carolyn M Teschke; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.