OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess whether Front-of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labels garner attention more readily than more complete, mandated nutrition information (the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP), required in the US), and 2) To determine whether label design characteristics, specifically, color coding and/or coding with facial icons, increase attention to the FOP label. METHODS: In two experiments, we tracked the allocation of attention while participants (n=125) viewed novel and commercial packages with varied FOP designs using a change detection methodology. RESULTS: We found empirical evidence that FOP labels are attended more often, and earlier, than the currently mandated NFP, and that this benefit is due both to its placement on the front of the package and to the design characteristics of the FOP. Specifically, the use of color in FOPs increased attention to the label, but there was no evidence that coding information via facial icons impacted attention. CONCLUSIONS: Our work supports a growing body of evidence supporting the use of FOP labels to attract attention to nutritional information. Findings may be relevant to inform policy decisions on labeling standards.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess whether Front-of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labels garner attention more readily than more complete, mandated nutrition information (the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP), required in the US), and 2) To determine whether label design characteristics, specifically, color coding and/or coding with facial icons, increase attention to the FOP label. METHODS: In two experiments, we tracked the allocation of attention while participants (n=125) viewed novel and commercial packages with varied FOP designs using a change detection methodology. RESULTS: We found empirical evidence that FOP labels are attended more often, and earlier, than the currently mandated NFP, and that this benefit is due both to its placement on the front of the package and to the design characteristics of the FOP. Specifically, the use of color in FOPs increased attention to the label, but there was no evidence that coding information via facial icons impacted attention. CONCLUSIONS: Our work supports a growing body of evidence supporting the use of FOP labels to attract attention to nutritional information. Findings may be relevant to inform policy decisions on labeling standards.
Entities:
Keywords:
Attentive behaviors; FOP; Front of Pack Labels; Information Processing; Nutrition labels; Nutritional Labeling; Obesity
Authors: Edward Awh; John Serences; Paul Laurey; Harpreet Dhaliwal; Thomas van der Jagt; Paul Dassonville Journal: Cogn Psychol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Christina A Roberto; Meenakshi Shivaram; Olivia Martinez; Cassie Boles; Jennifer L Harris; Kelly D Brownell Journal: Appetite Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Annet Jc Roodenburg; Johannes Brug; Jacob C Seidell Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ellis L Vyth; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Sanne F Mallant; Zinzi L Mol; Johannes Brug; Marcel Temminghoff; Gerda I Feunekes; Leon Jansen; Hans Verhagen; Jacob C Seidell Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2009 Oct-Nov
Authors: Ana Maria Mantilla Herrera; Michelle Crino; Holly E Erskine; Gary Sacks; Jaithri Ananthapavan; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Yong Yi Lee Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 5.717