Literature DB >> 26414836

Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Improved Patient Safety and Surgeon Convenience.

Fernando Martínez-Ubieto1, Teresa Jiménez-Bernadó1, Javier Martínez-Ubieto1, Antonio Cabrerizo1, Ana Pascual-Bellosta1, Luis Muñoz-Rodriguez1, Alfredo Jiménez-Bernadó1.   

Abstract

One of the aims of laparoscopic surgery is to improve upon the results obtained by open surgery. This clearly appears to have been achieved in bariatric surgery. Two-dimensional (2-D) systems have been used to date, though new 3-dimensional (3-D) technologies have been introduced in an attempt to improve surgeon vision and thus increase the safety of the surgical techniques. Sixty obese patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy using a device equipped with 3-D optics allowing surgery to be viewed by the surgeon in 3 dimensions by using a specific monitor and wearing appropriate glasses. The mean patient age was 48.1 years. The mean weight was 114 kg (range, 92-172), with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44 ± 5.21 kg/m(2). All surgeries were performed using the 3-D system, with a mean surgical time of 71 ± 49.6 minutes and a mean hospital stay of 3.0 ± 1.2 days. Only 1 intraoperative complication was recorded: retroperitoneal bleeding on insertion of the optical trocar. Over a mean follow-up period of 12 months, the mean body weight of the patients was 88 kg (range, 71-121), with a BMI of 30.56 ± 3.98 kg/m(2) and a percentage excess weight loss of 68.14% ± 7.89%. There was clear improvement of both the blood pressure and glucose levels. Three-dimensional sleeve gastrectomy is safe, viable, and fully reproducible compared with 2-D surgery, improving visualization of the surgical field, safety, and surgeon convenience. Randomized studies involving larger patient samples are needed for the comparison of results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D laparoscopy; Bariatric surgery; Metabolic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26414836      PMCID: PMC4587518          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00287.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  6 in total

1.  3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.

Authors:  Pirmin Storz; Gerhard F Buess; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Jens Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method.

Authors:  O J Wagner; M Hagen; A Kurmann; S Horgan; D Candinas; S A Vorburger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  For 3D laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation: how to get maximum benefit from 3D vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kunert; Pirmin Storz; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set.

Authors:  Youssef S Tanagho; Gerald L Andriole; Alethea G Paradis; Kerry M Madison; Gurdarshan S Sandhu; J Esteban Varela; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.878

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  3D vision and maintenance of stable pneumoperitoneum: a new step in the development of laparoscopic right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Takayuki Kawai; Claire Goumard; Florence Jeune; Shohei Komatsu; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopy in a Bariatric Surgery Program: Influence in the Learning Curve.

Authors:  Esther Mariño Padin; Raquel Sánchez Santos; Sonia González Fernández; Antonia Brox Jimenez; Sergio Estevez Fernández; Ester Carrera Dacosta; Agata Rial Duran; Maria Artime Rial; Ivan Dominguez Sanchez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic surgery in 3D improves results and surgeon convenience in sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Fernando Martínez-Ubieto; Cristian Aragón-Benedí; Ignacio Barranco-Dominguez; Lucía Tardós-Ascaso; Teresa Jiménez-Bernadó; Ana Pascual-Bellosta; José Manuel Ramírez-Rodriguez; Javier Martínez-Ubieto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  So Hyun Kang; Yongjoon Won; Kanghaeng Lee; Sang Il Youn; Sa-Hong Min; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques.

Authors:  Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-04-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.