Literature DB >> 26414175

Facilitators and Barriers to Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial Participation: Multi-National Perspective of People Living with Spinal Cord Injury.

Kim D Anderson1, Rachel E Cowan1, Jane Horsewell2.   

Abstract

These are exciting times for the translation of promising interventions for spinal cord injury (SCI) into testing with clinical trials. These interventions include acute surgical decompression, neuroprotection, neural repair, cell replacement, activity-based rehabilitation, and medical devices, including devices requiring surgical implantation. By nature, clinical trials can have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, which narrow down the pool of potential participants. Meeting enrollment numbers for properly powered trials is a daunting task. Therefore, it is important that trials are designed in a manner that facilitates participation. The purpose of this research study was to learn more about the factors that encourage or interfere with the decision to participate in clinical trials from the perspective of people living with SCI. A multi-national survey was conducted, primarily online, in which 802 participants with SCI ranked 32 factors as facilitators or barriers, using a Likert-type scale. There were 13 universal facilitators, five universal barriers, and three universally neutral factors. The number one facilitator was possible improvement in functionality and the number one barrier was possible decline in functionality--as may be expected. However, many unexpected facilitators and barriers were identified. There also were certain factors that were strong barriers or facilitators to certain sub-groups of people living with SCI. All of these factors should be taken into careful consideration when designing clinical trials so as to promote enrollment and enable adherence to different protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barrier; clinical trial; facilitator; participation; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26414175     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.4064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  10 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew R Blight; Jane Hsieh; Armin Curt; James W Fawcett; James D Guest; Naomi Kleitman; Shekar N Kurpad; Brian K Kwon; Daniel P Lammertse; Norbert Weidner; John D Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  How individuals with spinal cord injury in the United States access and assess information about experimental therapies and clinical trials: results of a clinical survey.

Authors:  Clara Farrehi; Carlotta Pazzi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-11-23

3.  An Assessment of Which Sociodemographic and Spinal Cord Injury-Specific Characteristics Influence Engagement With Experimental Therapies and Participation in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Carlotta Pazzi; Clara Farrehi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-17

Review 4.  Advanced Assessment of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Three-Tiered Approach to Characterizing Paralysis.

Authors:  Anne Bryden; Kevin L Kilgore; Gregory A Nemunaitis
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

5.  Motor cortical activity changes during neuroprosthetic-controlled object interaction.

Authors:  John E Downey; Lucas Brane; Robert A Gaunt; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Michael L Boninger; Jennifer L Collinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Central Recruitment: A process for engaging and recruiting individuals with spinal cord injury/disease in research at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute.

Authors:  B Catharine Craven; Louise Brisbois; Chelsea Pelletier; Julia Rybkina; Ann Heesters; Mary Caroline Verrier
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Facilitators and Barriers to International Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury: Results from a Survey of Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  Vanessa K Noonan; Elaine Chan; Kent Bassett-Spiers; David J Berlowitz; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Marnie Graco; Keith C Hayes; Jane Horsewell; Phalgun Joshi; Debora Markelis; Verna Smith; Zeina Waheed; Douglas J Brown
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Health promotion and cardiovascular risk reduction in people with spinal cord injury: physical activity, healthy diet and maintenance after discharge- protocol for a prospective national cohort study and a preintervention- postintervention study.

Authors:  Nicolaj Jersild Holm; Tom Møller; Lis Adamsen; Line Trine Dalsgaard; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Lone Helle Schou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Key Regulator of Necroptosis, RIP1 Kinase, Contributes to the Formation of Astrogliosis and Glial Scar in Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Yong-Ming Zhu; Liang Lin; Chao Wei; Yi Guo; Yuan Qin; Zhong-Sheng Li; Thomas A Kent; Claire E McCoy; Zhan-Xiang Wang; Yong Ni; Xian-Yong Zhou; Hui-Ling Zhang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.829

10.  Critical factors influencing the decision to enroll in a physical activity intervention among a predominant group of adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Byron W Lai; James H Rimmer; Alex Yates; Amanda Jeter; Hui-Ju Young; Mohanraj Thirumalai; Tapan Mehta; Jereme Wilroy
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.473

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.