Anne Bryden1, Kevin L Kilgore1,2,3, Gregory A Nemunaitis1,2. 1. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
Background: More than half of all individuals who sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI) experience some degree of impairment in the upper limb. Functional use of the arm and hand is of paramount importance to these individuals. Fortunately, the number of clinical trials and advanced interventions targeting upper limb function are increasing, generating optimism for improved recovery and restoration after SCI. New interventions for restoring function and improving recovery require more detailed examination of the motor capacities of the upper limb. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to introduce a three-tiered approach to evaluating motor function, with specific attention to the characteristics of weak and fully paralyzed muscles during acute rehabilitation. The three tiers include (1) evaluation of voluntary strength via manual muscle testing, (2) evaluation of lower motor neuron integrity in upper motor neuron-paralyzed muscles using surface electrical stimulation, and (3) evaluation of latent motor responses in paralyzed muscles that exhibit a strong response to electrical stimulation, using surface electromyographic recording electrodes. These characteristics contribute important information that can be utilized to mitigate potential secondary conditions such as contractures and identify effective interventions such as activity-based interventions or reconstructive procedures. Our goal is to encourage frontline clinicians - occupational and physical therapists who are experts in muscle assessment - to consider a more in-depth analysis of paralysis after SCI. Conclusion: Given the rapid advancements in SCI research and clinical interventions, it is critical that methods of evaluation and classification evolve. The success or failure of these interventions may depend on the specific characteristics identified in our three-tiered assessment. Without this assessment, the physiological starting point for each individual is unknown, adding significant variability in the outcomes of these interventions.
Background: More than half of all individuals who sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI) experience some degree of impairment in the upper limb. Functional use of the arm and hand is of paramount importance to these individuals. Fortunately, the number of clinical trials and advanced interventions targeting upper limb function are increasing, generating optimism for improved recovery and restoration after SCI. New interventions for restoring function and improving recovery require more detailed examination of the motor capacities of the upper limb. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to introduce a three-tiered approach to evaluating motor function, with specific attention to the characteristics of weak and fully paralyzed muscles during acute rehabilitation. The three tiers include (1) evaluation of voluntary strength via manual muscle testing, (2) evaluation of lower motor neuron integrity in upper motor neuron-paralyzed muscles using surface electrical stimulation, and (3) evaluation of latent motor responses in paralyzed muscles that exhibit a strong response to electrical stimulation, using surface electromyographic recording electrodes. These characteristics contribute important information that can be utilized to mitigate potential secondary conditions such as contractures and identify effective interventions such as activity-based interventions or reconstructive procedures. Our goal is to encourage frontline clinicians - occupational and physical therapists who are experts in muscle assessment - to consider a more in-depth analysis of paralysis after SCI. Conclusion: Given the rapid advancements in SCI research and clinical interventions, it is critical that methods of evaluation and classification evolve. The success or failure of these interventions may depend on the specific characteristics identified in our three-tiered assessment. Without this assessment, the physiological starting point for each individual is unknown, adding significant variability in the outcomes of these interventions.
Authors: Anne M Bryden; Harry A Hoyen; Michael W Keith; Melvin Mejia; Kevin L Kilgore; Gregory A Nemunaitis Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.966