| Literature DB >> 26413538 |
Marlijne E Ikink1, Johanna M M van Breugel1, Gerald Schubert2, Robbert J Nijenhuis1, Lambertus W Bartels3, Chrit T W Moonen3, Maurice A A J van den Bosch1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the safety and technical feasibility of volumetric magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) ablation with direct skin cooling (DISC) during treatment of uterine fibroids.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26413538 PMCID: PMC4568047 DOI: 10.1155/2015/684250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the differences between the clinical volumetric MR-HIFU system with (b) and without (a) the presence of the investigational DISC device.
Figure 2Typical representation of the MR images in the MR-HIFU user interface during treatment of uterine fibroids. The patient was lying in prone position (feet first) on the MR table top with the integrated direct skin cooling (DISC) device. The uterine fibroid was positioned directly above the MR-HIFU transducer. The ultrasound beam path was planned using T2-weighted MRI in three orthogonal planes, that is, coronal (top left), axial (top right), and sagittal (bottom left) plane. During each sonication, color temperature maps were computed by the MR-HIFU system using the proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermometry method and shown on top of the anatomical images (top left). Immediately after MR-HIFU treatment, the volume that was successfully treated was defined as the nonenhancing part of the fibroid on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (bottom right).
Figure 3Flowchart shows the patients' progress (n = 8) through the DISC study. MR-HIFU: magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; DISC: direct skin cooling; IC: informed consent; UFS-QoL: uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life.
Estimated binominal proportion confidence intervals using the Agresti-Coull (adjusted Wald) method [25].
| Sample sizea | Observed outcome | Estimation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Successesa | Failuresa |
| 95%-CI | ||
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| 8 | 8 | 0 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
| 8 | 7 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.51 | 1.00 |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 0.67 | 0.40 | 0.94 |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | 0.58 | 0.30 | 0.87 |
aValues are expressed in numbers; : sample proportion of success; CI: confidence interval.
Baseline characteristics and MRI findings (n = 8).
| Patient characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age (years)a | 42.5 (38.8–47.8) |
| BMI (kg/m2)a | 23.1 (19.9–28.1) |
| Symptomsb | |
| Menorrhagia | 3 (38%) |
| Bulky symptoms | 4 (50%) |
| Infertility | 1 (12%) |
| tSSSa | 57.9 (38.3–79.0) |
| Total HRQoLa | 48.7 (28.9–80.4) |
|
| |
| Lesion characteristics | |
|
| |
| Number of fibroidsb | |
| Solitary fibroid | 2 (25%) |
| Multiple fibroids | 6 (75%) |
| 2–5 fibroids | 4 (67%) |
| 6–10 fibroids | 2 (33%) |
| Location of fibroidsb | |
| Intramural | 6 (67%) |
| Submucosal | 3 (33%) |
| Type of fibroidb | |
| Type 1 | 4 (45%) |
| Type 2 | 3 (33%) |
| Type 3 | 2 (22%) |
| Maximum fibroid diameter (cm)a | 7.7 (5.1–8.8) |
| Uterine fibroid volume (cm3)a | 147 (49–338) |
aMedian (interquartile range); bnumber (percentage); MR-HIFU: MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; tSSS: transformed symptom severity score (range 0–100); high scores indicate more severe symptoms; HRQoL: health-related quality of life (range 0–100); high scores indicate better quality of life; type 1: low signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging; type 2: intermediate signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging; type 3: high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging; NPV: nonperfused volume.
Summary of treatment data of each patient treated with the DISC device.
| Patient | Patient geometry | Fibroid | Treatment | Patient condition | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Age | BMI | Subcut. fat [mm] | Abdominal scars | Type | Volume [cm3] | NPV [cm3] | NPV ratio [%] | Energy [kJ] | Time [min] | Energy deposition rate [kJ/h] | Skin temp. [°C] | Skin redness | Subcut. edema |
| 1 | 43 | 28.4 | 18–21 | Yes | 2 | 408 | 249 | 61 | 368 | 223 | 99 | 23.0 | no | no |
| 2 | 48 | 28.1 | 28–33 | Yes | 1 | 25 | 15 | 60 | 169 | 163 | 62 | 21.5 | no | no |
| 3 | 42 | 22.1 | 8–14 | No | 3 | 268 | 67 | 25 | 331 | 230 | 86 | 22.0 | no | no |
| 4 | 48 | 24.2 | 12–14 | Yes | 2 | 77 | 56 | 72 | 155 | 189 | 49 | 21.5 | no | no |
| 5 | 47 | 19.7 | 8–10 | No | 1 | 73 | 52 | 71 | 234 | 191 | 74 | 21.5 | no | no |
| 6 | 38 | 28.0 | 14–20 | No | 1 + 1 | 17 + 147 | 14 + 66 | 82 + 45 | 240 | 225 | 64 | 20.5 | no | no |
| 7 | 31 | 20.3 | 7–15 | No | 3 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 294 | 177 | 100 | 21.0 | no | no |
| 8 | 41 | 18.4 | 2–4 | No | 2 | 415 | 115 | 28 | 183 | 193 | 63 | 20.5 | no | no |
ID: identification number; temp.: equilibrium temperature as measured in the water reservoir; subcut.: subcutaneous.