OBJECTIVE: To assess the mid-term efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) using a volumetric ablation technique for treating uterine fibroids. METHODS:Forty-six premenopausal women with 58 symptomatic uterine fibroids were prospectively included for MR-HIFU. After treatment, CE-MRI allowed measurement of the non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio, defined as the non-enhancing part of the fibroid divided by fibroid volume. Clinical symptoms and fibroid size on T2W-MRI were quantified at 3 and 6 months' follow-up. The primary endpoint was a clinically relevant improvement in the transformed Symptom Severity Score (tSSS) of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, defined as a 10-point reduction. RESULTS: Volumetric ablation resulted in a mean NPV ratio of 0.40 ± 0.22, with a mean NPV of 141 ± 135 cm(3). Mean fibroid volume was 353 ± 269 cm(3) at baseline, which decreased to 271 ± 225 cm(3) at 6 months (P < 0.001), corresponding to a mean volume reduction of 29 % ± 20 %. Clinical follow-up showed that 54 % (25/46) of the patients reported a more than 10-point reduction in the tSSS. MeantSSS improved from 50.9 ± 18.4 at baseline to 34.7 ± 20.2 after 6 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Volumetric MR-HIFU is effective for patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. At 6 months, significant symptom improvement was observed in 54 % of patients. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound is a novel ablation technique for leiomyomatosis. • We prospectively evaluated the outcome of volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for symptomatic fibroids. • This study showed that volumetric MR-HIFU results in an effective treatment. • A randomised controlled trial would set this technique in an appropriate context.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the mid-term efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) using a volumetric ablation technique for treating uterine fibroids. METHODS: Forty-six premenopausal women with 58 symptomatic uterine fibroids were prospectively included for MR-HIFU. After treatment, CE-MRI allowed measurement of the non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio, defined as the non-enhancing part of the fibroid divided by fibroid volume. Clinical symptoms and fibroid size on T2W-MRI were quantified at 3 and 6 months' follow-up. The primary endpoint was a clinically relevant improvement in the transformed Symptom Severity Score (tSSS) of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, defined as a 10-point reduction. RESULTS: Volumetric ablation resulted in a mean NPV ratio of 0.40 ± 0.22, with a mean NPV of 141 ± 135 cm(3). Mean fibroid volume was 353 ± 269 cm(3) at baseline, which decreased to 271 ± 225 cm(3) at 6 months (P < 0.001), corresponding to a mean volume reduction of 29 % ± 20 %. Clinical follow-up showed that 54 % (25/46) of the patients reported a more than 10-point reduction in the tSSS. Mean tSSS improved from 50.9 ± 18.4 at baseline to 34.7 ± 20.2 after 6 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Volumetric MR-HIFU is effective for patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. At 6 months, significant symptom improvement was observed in 54 % of patients. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound is a novel ablation technique for leiomyomatosis. • We prospectively evaluated the outcome of volumetric MR-HIFU ablation for symptomatic fibroids. • This study showed that volumetric MR-HIFU results in an effective treatment. • A randomised controlled trial would set this technique in an appropriate context.
Authors: Charles Mougenot; Bruno Quesson; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Philippe Lourenco de Oliveira; Sara Sprinkhuizen; Jean Palussière; Nicolas Grenier; Chrit T W Moonen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Krzysztof R Gorny; Shigao Chen; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Gina K Hesley; David A Woodrum; Douglas L Brown; Joel P Felmlee Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-03-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Gina K Hesley; Krzysztof R Gorny; Tara L Henrichsen; David A Woodrum; Douglas L Brown Journal: Ultrasound Q Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.657
Authors: Fiona M Fennessy; Clare M Tempany; Nathan J McDannold; Minna J So; Gina Hesley; Bobbie Gostout; Hyun S Kim; George A Holland; Dennis A Sarti; Kullervo Hynynen; Ferenc A Jolesz; Elizabeth A Stewart Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marlijne E Ikink; Marianne J Voogt; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Robbert J Nijenhuis; Bilgin Keserci; Young-sun Kim; Koen L Vincken; Lambertus W Bartels Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marlijne E Ikink; Robbert J Nijenhuis; Helena M Verkooijen; Marianne J Voogt; Paul J H M Reuwer; Albert J Smeets; Paul N M Lohle; Maurice A A J van den Bosch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Inez M Verpalen; Jolien P de Boer; Marlot Linstra; Roelien L I Pol; Ingrid M Nijholt; Chrit T W Moonen; Lambertus W Bartels; Arie Franx; Martijn F Boomsma; Manon N G Braat Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 5.315