Literature DB >> 26411308

Identifying Community Perspectives for a Lung Cancer Screening Awareness Campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: The Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study.

Roberto Cardarelli1, Karen L Roper2, Kathryn Cardarelli3, Frances J Feltner4, Shirley Prater4, Karen Michelle Ledford4, Barbara Justice4, David R Reese5, Patsy Wagner6, Christine Cantrell7.   

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan is now covered by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services following an evidence-based recommendation, but a shared decision making process should inform patients of risks and limitations. An awareness campaign promoting LDCT screenings is an opportunity to elicit patient engagement with health providers about the risks and benefits. Focus groups representing three regions of Appalachian Kentucky known for high lung cancer rates discussed development of a lung cancer screening campaign. Recommendations included messaging content, appeals or design, campaign implementation, and trusted information or communication sources. Community health workers (CHWs) from three Eastern Kentucky regions recruited individuals from their local communities using established client files. CHWs hosted six total focus groups (7-11 participants each) using questions guided by the Communication-Persuasion Matrix framework. All sessions were recorded and transcribed for independent content analysis. A total of 54 individuals (61.1 % female; >55 pack year history) were participated. Prior to discussion, most participants had not heard of lung cancer screening. Cited needs for content of a campaign included benefits of early detection and payment information. Messages considered most persuasive were those that include personal testimony, messages of hope, prolonged life, and an emphasis on family and the ambition to survive. Having information come from one's family doctor or specialty provider was considered important to message communication. Messages about survivorship, family, and prolonged life should be considered in lung cancer screening awareness campaigns. Our results provide community input about messages regarding screening options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appalachia; Focus Groups; Lung cancer; Prevention; Qualitative; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26411308      PMCID: PMC5569580          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0914-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  10 in total

1.  Having a personal healthcare provider and receipt of adequate cervical and breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; Anita K Kurian; Vishwam Pandya
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Impact of a U.S. antismoking national media campaign on beliefs, cognitions and quit intentions.

Authors:  Jennifer C Duke; Kevin C Davis; Robert L Alexander; Anna J MacMonegle; Jami L Fraze; Robert M Rodes; Diane M Beistle
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-05-13

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lewis; W Jeffrey Petty; Janet A Tooze; David P Miller; Caroline Chiles; Antonius A Miller; Christina Bellinger; Kathryn E Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  'It's about the smoke, not the smoker': messages that motivate rural communities to support smoke-free policies.

Authors:  Ganna Kostygina; Ellen J Hahn; Mary Kay Rayens
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-08-22

7.  Having a personal health care provider and receipt of colorectal cancer testing.

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; Jennifer E Thomas
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  A qualitative analysis of how elders seek and disseminate health information.

Authors:  Kathryn Paige Altizer; Joseph G Grzywacz; Sara A Quandt; Ronny Bell; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2013-11-22

9.  Examining health information-seeking behaviors of older adults.

Authors:  Shomir Chaudhuri; Thai Le; Cathy White; Hilaire Thompson; George Demiris
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 10.  The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.

Authors:  Zoë Slote Morris; Steven Wooding; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Using Implementation Science to Disseminate a Lung Cancer Screening Education Intervention Through Community Health Workers.

Authors:  Lovoria B Williams; Brent J Shelton; Maria L Gomez; Yazan D Al-Mrayat; Jamie L Studts
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-02

2.  Differences in smoking prevalence and eligibility for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among older U.S. adults: role of sexual orientation.

Authors:  Alicia K Matthews; Sean Esteban McCabe; Joseph G L Lee; Phil Veliz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  John Monu; Matthew Triplette; Douglas E Wood; Erika M Wolff; Danielle C Lavallee; David R Flum; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Terminate lung cancer (TLC) study-A mixed-methods population approach to increase lung cancer screening awareness and low-dose computed tomography in Eastern Kentucky.

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; David Reese; Karen L Roper; Kathryn Cardarelli; Frances J Feltner; Jamie L Studts; Jennifer R Knight; Debra Armstrong; Anthony Weaver; Dana Shaffer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Lung Cancer Screening Utilization.

Authors:  Donghoon Shin; Michael D C Fishman; Michael Ngo; Jeffrey Wang; Christina A LeBedis
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Janella N Hudson; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Lauren E Wilson; Vani N Simmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Implementation of tobacco cessation services at a comprehensive cancer center: a qualitative study of oncology providers' perceptions and practices.

Authors:  Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick; Monica Webb Hooper
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  A Social-Ecological Review of Cancer Disparities in Kentucky.

Authors:  Sharon D Rodriguez; Nathan L Vanderford; Bin Huang; Robin C Vanderpool
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: Progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives for 4 common cancers.

Authors:  S Jane Henley; Cheryll C Thomas; Denise Riedel Lewis; Elizabeth M Ward; Farhad Islami; Manxia Wu; Hannah K Weir; Susan Scott; Recinda L Sherman; Jiemin Ma; Betsy A Kohler; Kathleen Cronin; Ahmedin Jemal; Vicki B Benard; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.921

10.  Implementation of Digital Awareness Strategies to Engage Patients and Providers in a Lung Cancer Screening Program: Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dana L Jessup; McKinley Glover Iv; Dania Daye; Lynda Banzi; Philip Jones; Garry Choy; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Efrén J Flores
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.