Samuel N Rodgers-Melnick1,2, Monica Webb Hooper3,4. 1. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 2. University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 3. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. monica.hooper@nih.gov. 4. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. monica.hooper@nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore (1) perceptions of tobacco cessation for patients, (2) perceived role in addressing patients' tobacco use, (3) facilitators and barriers to providing cessation services, and (4) perceptions and use of tobacco cessation resources among oncology providers. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 24 oncology providers at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Qualitative themes were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Participants (1) perceived smoking cessation's priority as low and/or dependent upon clinical factors, (2) described a passive role in addressing tobacco cessation, (3) described loss-framed versus gain-framed messaging when delivering cessation advice, (4) reported moderate self-efficacy in discussing and low self-efficacy in implementing cessation strategies, (5) described multi-level facilitators and barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and (6) expressed high value for the cancer center's tobacco cessation service. CONCLUSION: Oncology providers in this study perceived patients' tobacco cessation as a low priority relative to providing direct cancer treatment and addressing acute complications. These findings indicate opportunities for training to increase delivery of evidence-based cessation advice and facilitate patients' engagement in cessation services. Provider trainings on embracing an active role in tobacco cessation, addressing multi-level barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and using gain-framed messaging should be implemented. This has the potential to improve cancer patients' treatment outcomes.
PURPOSE: To explore (1) perceptions of tobacco cessation for patients, (2) perceived role in addressing patients' tobacco use, (3) facilitators and barriers to providing cessation services, and (4) perceptions and use of tobacco cessation resources among oncology providers. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 24 oncology providers at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Qualitative themes were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS:Participants (1) perceived smoking cessation's priority as low and/or dependent upon clinical factors, (2) described a passive role in addressing tobacco cessation, (3) described loss-framed versus gain-framed messaging when delivering cessation advice, (4) reported moderate self-efficacy in discussing and low self-efficacy in implementing cessation strategies, (5) described multi-level facilitators and barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and (6) expressed high value for the cancer center's tobacco cessation service. CONCLUSION: Oncology providers in this study perceived patients' tobacco cessation as a low priority relative to providing direct cancer treatment and addressing acute complications. These findings indicate opportunities for training to increase delivery of evidence-based cessation advice and facilitate patients' engagement in cessation services. Provider trainings on embracing an active role in tobacco cessation, addressing multi-level barriers to patients' tobacco cessation, and using gain-framed messaging should be implemented. This has the potential to improve cancerpatients' treatment outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer patients; Healthcare providers; Qualitative research; Smoking cessation
Authors: Vani Nath Simmons; Erika B Litvin; Riddhi D Patel; Paul B Jacobsen; Judith C McCaffrey; Gerold Bepler; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-10-20
Authors: Linda Sarna; Stella A Bialous; Marjorie Wells; Jenny Kotlerman; Mary E Wewers; Erika S Froelicher Journal: J Clin Nurs Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Kathryn E Weaver; Suzanne C Danhauer; Janet A Tooze; A William Blackstock; John Spangler; Leslie Thomas; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-02-14
Authors: Benjamin A Toll; Thomas H Brandon; Ellen R Gritz; Graham W Warren; Roy S Herbst Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Graham W Warren; James R Marshall; K Michael Cummings; Benjamin A Toll; Ellen R Gritz; Alan Hutson; Seyedeh Dibaj; Roy Herbst; James L Mulshine; Nasser Hanna; Carolyn A Dresler Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Sarah D Hohl; Jennifer E Bird; Claire V T Nguyen; Heather D'Angelo; Mara Minion; Danielle Pauk; Robert T Adsit; Michael Fiore; Margaret B Nolan; Betsy Rolland Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: David A Katz; Sarah L Mott; Jane A Utech; Autumn C Bahlmann; Kimberly A Dukes; Aaron T Seaman; Douglas E Laux; Muhammad Furqan; Zachary J Pollock; Mark W Vander Weg Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.626