Literature DB >> 25613118

Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.

Jennifer A Lewis1, W Jeffrey Petty2, Janet A Tooze3, David P Miller1, Caroline Chiles4, Antonius A Miller2, Christina Bellinger5, Kathryn E Weaver6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer-specific and overall mortality. We sought to assess lung cancer screening practices and attitudes among primary care providers (PCPs) in the era of new LDCT screening guidelines.
METHODS: In 2013, we surveyed PCPs at an academic medical center (60% response) and assessed: lung cancer screening use, perceived screening effectiveness, knowledge of screening guidelines, perceived barriers to LDCT use, and interest in LDCT screening education.
RESULTS: Few PCPs (n = 212) reported ordering lung cancer screening: chest X-ray (21%), LDCT (12%), and sputum cytology (3%). Only 47% of providers knew three or more of six guideline components for LDCT screening; 24% did not know any guideline components. In multiple logistic regression analysis, providers who knew three or more guideline components were more likely to order LDCT (OR, 7.1; 95% confidence intervals, 2.0-25.6). Many providers (30%) were unsure of the effectiveness of LDCT. Mammography, colonoscopy, and Pap smear were rated more frequently as effective in reducing cancer mortality compared with LDCT (all P values < 0.0001). Common perceived barriers included patient cost (86.9% major or minor barrier), harm from false positives (82.7%), patients' lack of awareness (81.3%), risk of incidental findings (81.3%), and insurance coverage (80.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: LDCT lung cancer screening is currently an uncommon practice at an academic medical center. PCPs report ordering chest X-ray, a nonrecommended screening test, more often than LDCT. PCPs had a limited understanding of lung cancer screening guidelines and LDCT effectiveness. Provider educational interventions are needed to facilitate shared decision-making with patients. IMPACT: This study describes some of the first data available about PCPs' use of lung cancer screening tests since the publication of multiple professional guidelines endorsing LDCT. Knowledge gaps were identified that may hinder the uptake of evidence-based lung cancer screening guidelines. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613118      PMCID: PMC4383689          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  22 in total

1.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups.

Authors:  Michael T Jaklitsch; Francine L Jacobson; John H M Austin; John K Field; James R Jett; Shaf Keshavjee; Heber MacMahon; James L Mulshine; Reginald F Munden; Ravi Salgia; Gary M Strauss; Scott J Swanson; William D Travis; David J Sugarbaker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: costs, national expenditures, and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Bernardo H L Goulart; Mark E Bensink; David G Mummy; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Joshua N Mirkin; Thomas K Oliver; Christopher G Azzoli; Donald A Berry; Otis W Brawley; Tim Byers; Graham A Colditz; Michael K Gould; James R Jett; Anita L Sabichi; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Douglas E Wood; Amir Qaseem; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Yongwu Shao; Eric J Feuer; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies.

Authors:  R Peto; S Darby; H Deo; P Silcocks; E Whitley; R Doll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

7.  Lung cancer screening practices of primary care physicians: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Pamela M Marcus; Paul K J Han; Thomas B Richards; Sally W Vernon; Gigi Yuan; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 8.  Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Stephenie C Lemon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Number needed to screen: development of a statistic for disease screening.

Authors:  C M Rembold
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-01

10.  Use of lung cancer screening tests in the United States: results from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  V Paul Doria-Rose; Mary C White; Carrie N Klabunde; Marion R Nadel; Thomas B Richards; Timothy S McNeel; Juan L Rodriguez; Pamela M Marcus
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  56 in total

1.  Examining Lung Cancer Screening Behaviors in the Primary Care Setting: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Alvie Ahsan; Eva Zimmerman; Elisa Marie Rodriguez; Christy Widman; Deborah Oates Erwin; Frances Georgette Saad-Harfouche; Martin Christopher Mahoney
Journal:  J Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2019-03-11

2.  Changes in Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices regarding Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad S Benefield; S Caitlin Bearden; Daniel S Reuland; Alison T Brenner; Adam O Goldstein; Allison Throneburg; M Patricia Rivera
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-08

3.  Using Twitter to Assess the Public Response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines on Lung Cancer Screening with Low Dose Chest CT.

Authors:  Siddharth Khasnavis; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Vinay Prabhu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Perceptions of and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Among Physicians in Puerto Rico: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mary S Rodríguez-Rabassa; Vani N Simmons; Agueda Vega; Daniela Moreno; Jessica Irizarry-Ramos; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2020

Review 5.  Low Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening: The Background, the Guidelines, and a Tailored Approach to Patient Care.

Authors:  Emily Tylski; Mala Goyal
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

6.  Use of CT and Chest Radiography for Lung Cancer Screening Before and After Publication of Screening Guidelines: Intended and Unintended Uptake.

Authors:  Jinhai Huo; Chan Shen; Robert J Volk; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Gary M R Deyter; Shawn Nishi; Tianhao Wang; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

9.  Level of Awareness of Various Aspects of Lung Cancer Among College Teachers in India: Impact of Cancer Awareness Programmes in Prevention and Early Detection.

Authors:  Abhishek Shankar; Shubham Roy; Abhidha Malik; G K Rath; P K Julka; Vineet Kumar Kamal; Keshav Barnwal; Sneha Upadhyaya; Rajan Singh; Vivek Srivastava
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Evaluation of Promotional Materials To Promote Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Screening to High-Risk Consumers and Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Janella N Hudson; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Lauren E Wilson; Vani N Simmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.