| Literature DB >> 26410558 |
Cheng Li1,2, Ying Lin3,4, Xueyun Zheng5,6, Nuo Pang7,8, Xihao Liao9,10, Xiaoxiao Liu11,12, Yuanyuan Huang13,14, Shuli Liang15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phytase is used as an animal feed additive that degrades phytic acid and reduces feeding costs and pollution caused by fecal excretion of phosphorus. Some phytases have been expressed in Pichia pastoris, among which the phytase from Citrobacter amalonaticus CGMCC 1696 had high specific activity (3548 U/mg). Improvement of the phytase expression level will contribute to facilitate its industrial applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26410558 PMCID: PMC4584009 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-015-0204-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Quantitative PCR assay of the PHY copy number in recombinant yeast strain genomic DNA. The threshold value (horizontal dashed line) was set at 0.2. The values indicate the average ± standard deviations from three independent qPCR experiments
Fig. 2Expression of the phytase from C. amalonaticus CGMCC 1696 in P. pastoris. a: Time dependence of the activity of phytase, cell growth and phytase protein content of Gs115/Phy after induction with methanol, using GS115/HKA as the background (control) sample. b: SDS-PAGE assay of the culture supernatant containing C. amalonaticus CGMCC 1696 phytase (stained with Coomassie Blue) after methanol induction for 96 h. Lane 1: culture supernatants from recombinant P. pastoris GS115/HKA; lane 2: culture supernatants from recombinant P. pastoris Gs115/Phy; lane 3: culture supernatants from recombinant P. pastoris Gs115/Phy after PNGase F treatment; lane 4: culture supernatants from recombinant P. pastoris GS115/HKA after PNGase F treatment
Fig. 3Different tactics for enhancing the expression of Phy in P. pastoris. a: Effect of modification of P and the signal peptide, increasing gene copy number, and overexpression of Kar2p, Ero1p, Pdi1p, or Hac1p on phytase production in recombinant strains carrying six Phy gene copies after 96-h induction with methanol. All activities used GS115/HKA as the background measurement. b: SDS-PAGE assay of the collected culture supernatant from the most effective strains after 96-h induction with methanol. Lane M: protein marker; lane 1: GS115/HKA; lane 2: GS115/Phy; lane 3: GS115/AOXm; lane 4: GS115/αE10; lane 5: GS115/6c; lane 6: 6c/HAC1; lane 7: 0.05 mg/mL BSA; lane 8: 0.2 mg/mL BSA; lane 9: 0.3 mg/mL BSA. c: The phytase protein content of the most effective strains after 96-h induction with methanol
Fig. 4Growth and phytase production time course of P. pastoris 6c/HAC1 in a 10-L fermenter. a: Time dependence of phytase activity, cell density and phytase protein content after induction with methanol. The phytase activity was detected using collected culture supernatant. The sample was boiled for 10 min was used as the background sample. b: SDS-PAGE assay of the collected culture supernatant. All the collected supernatants were diluted 1:40 with 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH5.5) (v/v). Lane M: protein marker; lane 1: induction for 24 h; lane 2: induction for 48 h; lane 3: induction for 72 h; lane 4: induction for 96 h; lane 5: induction for 120 h; lane 6: induction for 144 h; lane 7: 0.05 mg/mL BSA; lane 8: 0.2 mg/mL BSA; lane 9: 0.3 mg/mL BSA
Fig. 5Changes in phytase activity of strain 6c/HAC1 after ten cultivations. The phytase activity of strain 6c/HAC1 after ten sub-cultivations with 96-h methanol induction. All activities were compared with the activity of the original clone, with GS115/HKA as the background sample