OBJECTIVES: This study investigated sex differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in women. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are 2 methods of assessing the coronary microcirculation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 117 women and 40 men with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We performed CFR, IMR, fractional flow reserve, and quantitative coronary angiography in the left anterior descending artery. Coronary flow was assessed with a thermodilution method by obtaining mean transit time (Tmn) (an inverse correlate to absolute flow) at rest and hyperemia. RESULTS: All patients had minimal atherosclerosis by quantitative coronary angiography (% diameter stenosis: 23.2 ± 12.3%), and epicardial disease was milder in women (fractional flow reserve: 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.87 ± 0.04; p = 0.04). IMR was similar between the sexes (20.7 ± 9.8 vs. 19.1 ± 8.0; p = 0.45), but CFR was lower in women (3.8 ± 1.6 vs. 4.8 ± 1.9; p = 0.004). This was primarily due to a shorter resting Tmn in women (p = 0.005), suggesting increased resting coronary flow, whereas hyperemic Tmn was identical (p = 0.79). In multivariable analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of lower CFR and shorter resting Tmn. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar microvascular function in women and men by IMR, CFR is lower in women. This discrepancy appears to be due to differences in resting coronary flow between the sexes. The effect of sex differences should be considered in interpretation of physiological indexes using resting coronary flow.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated sex differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND:Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in women. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) are 2 methods of assessing the coronary microcirculation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 117 women and 40 men with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We performed CFR, IMR, fractional flow reserve, and quantitative coronary angiography in the left anterior descending artery. Coronary flow was assessed with a thermodilution method by obtaining mean transit time (Tmn) (an inverse correlate to absolute flow) at rest and hyperemia. RESULTS: All patients had minimal atherosclerosis by quantitative coronary angiography (% diameter stenosis: 23.2 ± 12.3%), and epicardial disease was milder in women (fractional flow reserve: 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.87 ± 0.04; p = 0.04). IMR was similar between the sexes (20.7 ± 9.8 vs. 19.1 ± 8.0; p = 0.45), but CFR was lower in women (3.8 ± 1.6 vs. 4.8 ± 1.9; p = 0.004). This was primarily due to a shorter resting Tmn in women (p = 0.005), suggesting increased resting coronary flow, whereas hyperemic Tmn was identical (p = 0.79). In multivariable analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of lower CFR and shorter resting Tmn. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar microvascular function in women and men by IMR, CFR is lower in women. This discrepancy appears to be due to differences in resting coronary flow between the sexes. The effect of sex differences should be considered in interpretation of physiological indexes using resting coronary flow.
Authors: William F Fearon; Leora B Balsam; H M Omar Farouque; Anthony D Caffarelli; Robert C Robbins; Peter J Fitzgerald; Paul G Yock; Alan C Yeung Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Janet Wei; Puja K Mehta; B Delia Johnson; Bruce Samuels; Saibal Kar; R David Anderson; Babak Azarbal; John Petersen; Barry Sharaf; Eileen Handberg; Chrisandra Shufelt; Kamlesh Kothawade; George Sopko; Amir Lerman; Leslee Shaw; Sheryl F Kelsey; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Tim P van de Hoef; Matthijs Bax; Martijn Meuwissen; Peter Damman; Ronak Delewi; Robbert J de Winter; Karel T Koch; Carl Schotborgh; José P S Henriques; Jan G P Tijssen; Jan J Piek Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Oscar C Marroquin; Richard Holubkov; Daniel Edmundowicz; Cheryl Rickens; Gerald Pohost; Steven Buchthal; Carl J Pepine; George Sopko; Robert C Sembrat; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Steven E Reis Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: S E Reis; R Holubkov; J S Lee; B Sharaf; N Reichek; W J Rogers; E G Walsh; A R Fuisz; R Kerensky; K M Detre; G Sopko; C J Pepine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Harmony R Reynolds; C Noel Bairey Merz; Colin Berry; Rohit Samuel; Jacqueline Saw; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Robert Sykes; Viviany R Taqueti; Janet Wei Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Vedant S Pargaonkar; Yuhei Kobayashi; Takumi Kimura; Ingela Schnittger; Eric K H Chow; Victor F Froelicher; Ian S Rogers; David P Lee; William F Fearon; Alan C Yeung; Marcia L Stefanick; Jennifer A Tremmel Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.039
Authors: Vedant S Pargaonkar; Justin H Lee; Eric K H Chow; Takeshi Nishi; Robyn L Ball; Yuhei Kobayashi; Takumi Kimura; David P Lee; Marcia L Stefanick; William F Fearon; Alan C Yeung; Jennifer A Tremmel Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 7.514
Authors: Maria Lembo; Rosa Sicari; Roberta Esposito; Fausto Rigo; Lauro Cortigiani; Francesco Lo Iudice; Eugenio Picano; Bruno Trimarco; Maurizio Galderisi Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 5.501