Literature DB >> 30527992

Accuracy of non-invasive stress testing in women and men with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Vedant S Pargaonkar1, Yuhei Kobayashi1, Takumi Kimura1, Ingela Schnittger1, Eric K H Chow2, Victor F Froelicher1, Ian S Rogers1, David P Lee1, William F Fearon1, Alan C Yeung1, Marcia L Stefanick3, Jennifer A Tremmel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While >20% of patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory with angina have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), a majority (77%) have an occult coronary abnormality (endothelial dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction (MVD), and/or a myocardial bridge (MB)). There are little data regarding the ability of noninvasive stress testing to identify these occult abnormalities in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive CAD.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 155 patients (76.7% women) with angina and no obstructive CAD who underwent stress echocardiography and/or electrocardiography before angiography. We evaluated Duke treadmill score, heart rate recovery (HRR), metabolic equivalents, and blood pressure response. During angiography, patients underwent invasive testing for endothelial dysfunction (decrease in epicardial coronary artery diameter >20% after intracoronary acetylcholine), MVD (index of microcirculatory resistance ≥25), and intravascular ultrasound for the presence of an MB.
RESULTS: Stress echocardiography and electrocardiography were positive in 58 (43.6%) and 57 (36.7%) patients, respectively. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 96 (64%), MVD in 32 (20.6%), and an MB in 83 (53.9%). On multivariable logistic regression, stress echo was not associated with any abnormality, while stress ECG was associated with endothelial dysfunction. An abnormal HRR was associated with endothelial dysfunction and MVD, but not an MB.
CONCLUSION: Conventional stress testing is insufficient for identifying occult coronary abnormalities that are frequently present in patients with angina in the absence of obstructive CAD. A normal stress test does not rule out a non-obstructive coronary etiology of angina, nor does it negate the need for comprehensive invasive testing.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angina; Coronary artery disease; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527992      PMCID: PMC9017854          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.039


  49 in total

1.  Usefulness of attenuated heart rate recovery immediately after exercise to predict endothelial dysfunction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Po-Hsun Huang; Hsin-Bang Leu; Jaw-Wen Chen; Chien-Ming Cheng; Chun-Yao Huang; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Philip Yu-An Ding; Shing-Jong Lin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Morton J Kern; Amir Lerman; Jan-Willen Bech; Bernard De Bruyne; Eric Eeckhout; William F Fearon; Stuart T Higano; Michael J Lim; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek; Nico H J Pijls; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Sherif F Nagueh; Abdou A Elhendy; Cathryn A Kuehl; Stephen G Sawada
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Heterogeneity of microvascular dysfunction in women with chest pain not attributable to coronary artery disease: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Oscar C Marroquin; Richard Holubkov; Daniel Edmundowicz; Cheryl Rickens; Gerald Pohost; Steven Buchthal; Carl J Pepine; George Sopko; Robert C Sembrat; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Steven E Reis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality.

Authors:  C R Cole; E H Blackstone; F J Pashkow; C E Snader; M S Lauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina.

Authors:  Peter Ong; Paolo G Camici; John F Beltrame; Filippo Crea; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Udo Sechtem; Juan Carlos Kaski; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 7.  Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Gianrossi; R Detrano; D Mulvihill; K Lehmann; P Dubach; A Colombo; D McArthur; V Froelicher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project.

Authors:  Martha Gulati; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Candace McClure; B Delia Johnson; Leslee J Shaw; Eileen M Handberg; Issam Zineh; Sheryl F Kelsey; Morton F Arnsdorf; Henry R Black; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-11

9.  Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real-world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: insights from the International Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Registry.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Jamie Layland; Ji-Hyun Jung; Hyun-Jung Lee; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Stuart Watkins; Andy S Yong; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Bon-Kwon Koo; Martin K Ng; Javier Escaned; William F Fearon; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Burden of hospital admission and repeat angiography in angina pectoris patients with and without coronary artery disease: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lasse Jespersen; Steen Z Abildstrom; Anders Hvelplund; Jan K Madsen; Soren Galatius; Frants Pedersen; Soren Hojberg; Eva Prescott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Myocardial Microvascular Physiology in Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndromes, Aortic Stenosis, and Heart Failure.

Authors:  Alf I Larsen; William F Fearon; Todd J Anderson; Nico Pijls
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 1.776

2.  Diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in Yemeni patients using treadmill test.

Authors:  Nouradden N Aljaber; Shanei A Shanei; Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi; Kamal D Alsultan; Moawia B Gameraddin; Khaled M Al-Sayaghi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-05-31

3.  Dose-Response Relationship Between Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Minimal Lumen Diameter in Coronary Endothelial Function Testing of Women and Men With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Vedant S Pargaonkar; Justin H Lee; Eric K H Chow; Takeshi Nishi; Robyn L Ball; Yuhei Kobayashi; Takumi Kimura; David P Lee; Marcia L Stefanick; William F Fearon; Alan C Yeung; Jennifer A Tremmel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 7.514

Review 4.  Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Vasospasm in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Niya Mileva; Sakura Nagumo; Takuya Mizukami; Jeroen Sonck; Colin Berry; Emanuele Gallinoro; Giovanni Monizzi; Alessandro Candreva; Daniel Munhoz; Dobrin Vassilev; Martin Penicka; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne; Carlos Collet
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.