Literature DB >> 12821539

Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation.

William F Fearon1, Leora B Balsam, H M Omar Farouque, Anthony D Caffarelli, Robert C Robbins, Peter J Fitzgerald, Paul G Yock, Alan C Yeung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A relatively simple, invasive method for quantitatively assessing the status of the coronary microcirculation independent of the epicardial artery is lacking. METHODS AND
RESULTS: By using a coronary pressure wire and modified software, it is possible to calculate the mean transit time of room-temperature saline injected down a coronary artery. The inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time has been shown to correlate with absolute flow. We hypothesize that distal coronary pressure divided by the inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time provides an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) that will correlate with true microcirculatory resistance (TMR), defined as the distal left anterior descending (LAD) pressure divided by hyperemic flow, measured with an external ultrasonic flow probe. A total of 61 measurements were made in 9 Yorkshire swine at baseline and after disruption of the coronary microcirculation, both with and without an epicardial LAD stenosis. The mean IMR (16.9+/-6.5 U to 25.9+/-14.4 U, P=0.002) and TMR (0.51+/-0.14 to 0.79+/-0.32 mm Hg x mL(-1) x min(-1), P=0.0001), as well as the % change in IMR (147+/-66%) and TMR (159+/-105%, P=NS versus IMR % change), increased significantly and to a similar degree after disruption of the microcirculation. These changes were independent of the status of the epicardial artery. There was a significant correlation between mean IMR and TMR values, as well as between the % change in IMR and % change in TMR.
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring IMR may provide a simple, quantitative, invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12821539     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  133 in total

Review 1.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 2.  Diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction - Present status.

Authors:  S R Mittal
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  Association of haematological indices with the degree of microvascular injury in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Murat Sezer; Irem Okcular; Taner Goren; Huseyin Oflaz; Yilmaz Nisanci; Berrin Umman; Fehmi Mercanoglu; Ahmet K Bilge; Mehmet Meric; Sabahattin Umman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Changes in coronary anatomy and physiology after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Atsushi Hirohata; Mamoo Nakamura; Katsuhisa Waseda; Yasuhiro Honda; David P Lee; Randall H Vagelos; Sharon A Hunt; Hannah A Valantine; Paul G Yock; Peter J Fitzgerald; Alan C Yeung; William F Fearon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Influence of visual-functional mismatch on coronary flow profiles after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Masahiro Hoshino; Taishi Yonetsu; Tadashi Murai; Yoshihisa Kanaji; Eisuke Usui; Masahiro Hada; Rikuta Hamaya; Yoshinori Kanno; Tetsumin Lee; Tsunekazu Kakuta
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Use of the TIMI frame count in the assessment of coronary artery blood flow and microvascular function over the past 15 years.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Kunadian; Caitlin Harrigan; Cafer Zorkun; Alexandra M Palmer; Katherine J Ogando; Leah H Biller; Erin E Lord; Scott P Williams; Michelle E Lew; Lauren N Ciaglo; Jacqueline L Buros; Susan J Marble; William J Gibson; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Assessment of coronary microcirculation in a swine animal model.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Quantification of coronary microvascular resistance using angiographic images for volumetric blood flow measurement: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Parham Eshtehardi; Jennifer Luke; Michael C McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.