| Literature DB >> 26400221 |
Sergio Andrade-Ochoa1, Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón1, Luvia E Sánchez-Torres2, Manuel Villanueva-García3, Blanca E Sánchez-Ramírez1, Luz María Rodríguez-Valdez1, Blanca E Rivera-Chavira4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Essential oils and their constituents are commonly known for their antibacterial, antifungal and antiparasitic activity, and there are also reports on the antimycobacterial properties, but more experimental data are needed for the description of the mechanism of action or structural (and molecular) properties related to the antimicrobial activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26400221 PMCID: PMC4579641 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0858-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Chemical structures of terpenes and phenylpropanes evaluated against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis and studied by molecular modeling technique. 1) Cinnamic Acid; 2) Camphor, 3) p-Anisaldehyde; 4) β-pinene; 5) 3-Carene; 6) p-Cymene; 7) β-Cariophylene; 8) Carvacrol; 9) (+) Carvone; 10) Cinnamaldehyde; 11) β-Citronellol; 12) Cuminaldehyde: 13) Estragole; 14) Eucalyptol; 15) Eugenol; 16) Geraniol; 17) (+) Limonene; 18) Linalool; 19) Menthol; 20) Myrcene; 21) Sabinene; 22) t-Anethole; 23) α-Terpinene; 24) Terpinolene; 25) Thymol
Antimycobacterial activity of terpenes and phenylpropanes against M. tuberculosis and M. bovis
| Compounds | Antimycobacterial activity (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| MIC | MIC | ||
| 1 | Cinnamic Acid | 8.16 ± 3.32FG | 7.29 ± 4.73DE |
| 2 | Camphor | 41.66 ± 14.43CD | 50.00 ± 0.00B |
| 3 |
| 4.16 ± 1.81FG | 10.41 ± 3.61DE |
| 4 |
| 10.41 ± 3.61CDE | 41.66 ± 14.43CDE |
| 5 | 3-Carene | 16.66 ± 7.22CDEF | 33.33 ± 14.43CDE |
| 6 |
| 91.66 ± 14.43 A | 91.66 ± 14.43 A |
| 7 |
| 100.00 ± 0.00 A | 100.00 ± 0.00 A |
| 8 | Carvacrol | 2.02 ± 0.88FG | 5.20 ± 1.81DE |
| 9 | (+) Carvone | 20.83 ± 7.22CDE | 41.33 ± 15.01BCDE |
| 10 | Cinnamaldehyde | 3.12 ± 0.00EFG | 12.50 ± 0.00DE |
| 11 |
| 6.25 ± 0.00FG | 10.41 ± 3.61DE |
| 12 | Cuminaldehyde | 10.41 ± 3.61DEFG | 20.83 ± 7.22CDE |
| 13 | Estragole | 20.83 ± 7.22DEFG | 25.00 ± 0.00BCDE |
| 14 | Eucalyptol | 41.66 ± 14.43CDE | 41.66 ± 14.43B |
| 15 | Eugenol | 25.00 ± 0.00DEFG | 20.83 ± 7.22BCD |
| 16 | Geraniol | 12.50 ± 0.00EFG | 12.50 ± 0.00 CDE |
| 17 | (+) Limonene | 25.00 ± 0.00CDE | 41.66 ± 14.43BCD |
| 18 | Linalool | 33.33 ± 14.43CDE | 41.66 ± 14.43BC |
| 19 | Menthol | 41.66 ± 14.43 AB | 83.33 ± 14.43B |
| 20 | Myrcene | 25.00 ± 0.00CDEF | 33.33 ± 14.43BCD |
| 21 | Sabinene | 33.33 ± 14.43DEFG | 25.00 ± 0.00BC |
| 22 |
| 20.83 ± 7.22BC | 58.33 ± 14.43BCDE |
| 23 | α-Terpinene | 10.41 ± 3.61DEFG | 20.83 ± 7.22CDE |
| 24 | Terpinolene | 8.33 ± 3.61CDEF | 33.33 ± 14.43DE |
| 25 | Thymol | 0.78 ± 0.01G | 2.02 ± 0.88E |
| TX | Isoniazid | 0.26 ± 0.01G | 0.16 ± 0.3E |
| TX | Rifampicin | 0.60 ± 0.14G | 0.50 ± 0.01E |
Values are the average and standard deviation of triplicate assays. Superscripts correspond to clusters by similarity analysis done by Tukey mean analysis
Cytotoxic concentrations of p-Cymene, carvacrol, menthol and thymol solutions on J774 macrophages
| Compounds | Cytotoxic activity (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| CC50 | CC90 | |
|
| 1166.67 ± 44.34 | 2200.00 ± 86.60 |
| Carvacrol | 900.00 ± 86.60 | 1950.00 ± 107.44 |
| Menthol | 1450.00 ± 180.28 | 2600.00 ± 304.14 |
| Thymol | 483.33 ± 28.87 | 1133.33 ± 115.47 |
Values are the average and standard deviation of three assays
Fig. 2Predicted versus experimental antimycobacterial activity against M. tuberculosis for molecules in the training set used. a Structural descriptors model. b Molecular descriptors model
A summary of the statistics QSAR models for activity against M. tuberculosis
| Parameter | Structure-activity relationship | Parameter | Property-Activity Relationship | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||
| n | 25 | 25 | 25 | n | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Q2 | 70.50 | 69.25 | 67.25 | Q2 | 81.25 | 79.13 | 78.16 |
| R2 | 77.83 | 77.54 | 77.54 | R2 | 87.69 | 87.08 | 87.08 |
| F | 12.3 | 12.1 | 12.1 | F | 24.9 | 23.6 | 23.6 |
| s | 0.260 | 0.261 | 0.261 | s | 0.160 | 0.164 | 0.164 |
| Contributions (%) | Contributions (%) | ||||||
| nCrt | 0.1678 | -- | -- | MlogP | 0.4824 | 0.4559 | 0.4559 |
| nCq | -- | 0.3001 | -- | MV | 0.0281 | 0.0283 | 0.0283 |
| nCrq | -- | -- | 0.3001 | ELUMO | 0.1889 | -- | 0.1877 |
| nR = Cp | 0.3635 | 0.3657 | 0.3657 | Se | -- | - 0.1144 | - 0.1144 |
| nArOH | 1.0495 | 1.0570 | 1.0570 | Qtot | - 0.0175 | -- | -- |
| nRCO | – 1.1609 | – 1.0026 | – 1.0026 | A | -- | - 0.1877 | -- |
| Intercept | – 0.9395 | – 0.9470 | – 0.9470 | Intercept | 3.0240 | 2.2534 | 2.2534 |
n Number of systems evaluated, Q The square of the coefficient of cross-validation, R The square of the correlation coefficient, s standard deviation, F Fisher statistic
Physicochemical, structural, topological and constitutional descriptors: nCrt number of ring tertiary C (sp3), nCq number of total quaternary C (sp3), nCrq number of ring quaternary C (sp3), nR = Cp number of terminal primary C (sp2), nArOH number of phenolic groups, nRCO number of ketone groups, E Energy LUMO orbital, MlogP Moriguchi octanol-water partition coeff., MV Molar Volume, Se sum of atomic Sanderson electronegativities (scaled on Carbon atom), Qtot total absolute charge), A Electron Affinity
Fig. 3Predicted versus experimental antimycobacterial activity against M. bovis for molecules in the training set based. a Structural descriptors model. b Molecular descriptors model
A summary of the statistics of the QSAR models for activity against M. bovis
| Parameter | Structure-activity relationship | Parameter | Property-Activity Relationship | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||
| n | 25 | 25 | 25 | n | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Q2 | 76.94 | 75.12 | 72.31 | Q2 | 70.25 | 70.64 | 69.51 |
| R2 | 79.89 | 79.10 | 77.06 | R2 | 76.89 | 74.43 | 72.54 |
| F | 12.7 | 12.3 | 10.9 | F | 10.0 | 8.7 | 7.9 |
| s | 0.198 | 0.201 | 0.210 | s | 0.209 | 0.219 | 0.227 |
| Contributions (%) | Contributions (%) | ||||||
| nCp | - 0.1381 | -- | - 0.0921 | UNIP | 0.1095 | 0.1052 | 0.0609 |
| nCconj | 0.0893 | 0.0557 | 0.0611 | Hy | - 1.3558 | - 1.3505 | - 0.9442 |
| nArOH | 1.3088 | 1.0765 | 0.9820 | AlogP | 0.4974 | -- | -- |
| nOH | 0.6965 | -- | -- | AlogP2 | -- | 0.0831 | -- |
| nR = Ct | -- | 0.0968 | -- | EHOMO | -- | -- | - 0.2230 |
| HAcc | -- | 0.3346 | 0.2500 | m | - 0.2835 | - 0.2653 | - 0.1215 |
| Intercept | - 1.2011 | - 1.7189 | - 1.5389 | Intercept | 0.0065 | 0.6590 | 2.3500 |
n Number of systems evaluated, Q The square of the coefficient of cross-validation, R The square of the correlation coefficient, s standard deviation, F Fisher statistic
Physicochemical, structural, topological and constitutional descriptors: nCp Number of terminal primary C (sp3), nCconj Number of non-aromatic conjugated C (sp2), nArOH Number of fenólico groups, nOH Number of hydroxyl groups, nR = Ct Number of aliphatic tertiary C(sp2), HAcc Number of acceptor atoms for H-bonds (N,O,F), UNIP Unipolarity, AlogP Ghose-Crippen octanol-water partition coeff., AlogP Squared Ghose-Crippen octanol-water partition coeff., E Energy of the HOMO orbital, m Dipole moment
Fig. 4Molecular systems optimized calculated by DFT B3LYP/6-311G** level at theory and mapping of the frontier orbitals. a p-cymene b Menthol c Carvacrol d Thymol
Theoretical descriptors of chemical reactivity for terpenes calculated by Hartree-Fock (HF) with a 6-311G**
| Molecule | EHOMO | ELUMO | GapE | m | I | A | μ | χ | η |
| ΔGsolv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (Debye) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (eV) | (kcal/mol) | |
|
| −8.4628 | 3.8068 | 4.6560 | 0.0890 | 8.4628 | −3.8068 | 2.3280 | −2.3280 | 6.1348 | 0.1630 | 7.71 |
| Carvacrol | −8.2859 | 3.9429 | 4.3431 | 1.9475 | 8.2859 | −3.9429 | 2.1715 | −2.1715 | 6.1144 | 0.1635 | 1.11 |
| Menthol | −10.8438 | 5.7769 | 5.0669 | 2.4083 | 10.8438 | −5.7769 | 2.5335 | −2.5335 | 8.3104 | 0.1203 | 3.63 |
| Thymol | −8.3104 | 3.8640 | 4.4465 | 1.8865 | 8.3104 | −3.8640 | 2.2232 | −2.2232 | 6.0872 | 0.1643 | 1.67 |
E Energy of the HOMO orbital, E Energy LUMO orbital, m Dipole moment, GapE ELUMO - EHOMO Gap energy, I Ionization potential, A Electron Affinity, μ Chemical potential χ Electronegativity, ƞ = Chemical hardness, S Chemical softness, ω Electrophilicity, ΔG Aqueous solvation energy
|
| Q2 = 74.63 | R2 = 80.23 | F = 14.2 | s = 0.245 |
|
| Q2 = 79.09 | R2 = 82.11 | F = 14.9 | s = 0.186 |
|
| Q2 = 81.25 | R2 = 91.69 | F = 24.9 | s = 0.106 |
|
| Q2 = 44.67 | R2 = 78.49 | F = 10.9 | s = 0.201 |