Literature DB >> 26396766

Anomalous halogen bonds in the crystal structures of 1,2,3-tri-bromo-5-nitro-benzene and 1,3-di-bromo-2-iodo-5-nitro-benzene.

José A Romero1, Gerardo Aguirre Hernández1, Sylvain Bernès2.   

Abstract

The title trihalogenated nitro-benzene derivatives, C6H2Br3NO2 and C6H2Br2INO2, crystallize in triclinic and monoclinic cells, respectively, with two mol-ecules per asymmetric unit in each case. The asymmetric unit of the tri-bromo compound features a polarized Br(δ+)⋯Br(δ-) inter-molecular halogen bond. After substitution of the Br atom in the para position with respect to the nitro group, the network of X⋯X halogen contacts is reorganized. Two inter-molecular polarized halogen bonds are then observed, which present the uncommon polarization Br(δ+)⋯I(δ-): the more electronegative site (Br) behaves as a donor and the less electronegative site (I) as an acceptor for the charge transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bromine; crystal structure; halogen bond; iodine; polyhalogenated benzene

Year:  2015        PMID: 26396766      PMCID: PMC4571367          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Within the large class of non-covalent inter­actions studied in chemical crystallography, halogen bonds are of special inter­est in crystal engineering. The stabilizing inter­action between a halogen atom and a Lewis base, X⋯B, shares many aspects with classical hydrogen bonds, but is more directional. On the other hand, halogen contacts X⋯X are more difficult to conceptualize (Wang et al., 2014 ▸), for instance because the charge transfer in the BrBr contact is not as obvious as in hydrogen bonds. Evidence supporting the importance of this topic is the recent organization of an inter­national meeting dedicated to halogen bonding (Erdelyi, 2014 ▸). In this context, we are engaged in the synthesis and structural characterization of a series of halogen-substituted nitro­benzenes. The present communication describes two closely related compounds in the series, which differ only by the halogen atom substituting at the ring position para to the nitro group. Despite the small chemical modification, the resulting crystal structures are very different, as a consequence of a different network of halogen bonds.

Structural commentary

Both compounds crystallize with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, but in different space groups. The tri­bromo derivative, (I, Fig. 1 ▸), is a P crystal isomorphous to the chloro analogue (Bhar et al., 1995 ▸), although the unit-cell parameters are significantly larger for (I) compared to the chloro compound: the cell volume is increased by more than 7%. In the present work, we retained the Niggli reduced triclinic cell (a < b < c), while Bhar et al. used a non-reduced cell. Moreover, the asymmetric unit content was defined in order to emphasize the strongest BrBr bond in (I). The bromo-iodo derivative (II, Fig. 2 ▸) crystallizes in the monoclinic system and, in that case, the standard setting was used for space group P21/c.
Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of (I), with displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level. The dashed bond connecting the independent mol­ecules is a type-II halogen bond.

Figure 2

The asymmetric unit of (II), with displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level. The dashed bonds connecting the independent mol­ecules are halogen contacts.

The Chalogen bond lengths are as expected. In (I), CBr distances are in the range 1.821 (12)–1.886 (11) Å, slightly shorter than CBr bond lengths observed in hexa­bromo­benzene, 1.881 Å (T = 100 K; Reddy et al., 2006 ▸) or 1.871 Å (synchrotron study, T = 100 K; Brezgunova et al., 2012 ▸). In (II), CBr bond lengths are longer, 1.875 (13) to 1.895 (14) Å, while the CI bond lengths, 2.088 (12) and 2.074 (14) Å, may be compared to bonds in hexa­iodo­benzene, 2.109 Å (T = 100 K; Ghosh et al., 2007 ▸) or 1,2,3-tri­iodo­benzene, 2.090 Å (T = 223 K, Novak & Li, 2007 ▸). Indeed, differences in bond lengths between perhalogenated and trihalogenated derivatives are within experimental errors, and the substitution of the 5-position by the nitro electron-withdrawing group in (I) and (II) has probably little influence on these bonds. The important feature in these halogenated mol­ecules is rather the possibility of steric repulsion between vicinal halogen atoms, which is related to the reduction of endocyclic angles. Regarding this point, it is worth reading the Acta E article about 1,2,3-tri­iodo­benzene (Novak & Li, 2007 ▸). As in polyiodo derivatives, intra­molecular steric crowding between the halogen atoms in (I) and (II) is offset by benzene ring distortion. As a consequence, the C1—C2—C3 and equivalent C11—C12—C13 angles are systematically less than 120°: 116.2 (11) and 118.8 (13)° in (I); 118.1 (12) and 117.3 (13)° in (II). Again, the nitro group has little influence on intra­molecular halogenhalogen contacts. For instance, in 1,3-di­bromo-2-iodo­benzene, the C1—C2—C3 angle is 118.0° (Schmidbaur et al., 2004 ▸), very close to that observed in (II), which presents the same halogen substitution. The 5-nitro substituent is almost conjugated with the benzene nucleus in (I): the dihedral angle between the NO2 plane and the benzene ring is 6(2) and 1(2)° for each independent mol­ecule. For (II), twisting of the NO2 groups is more significant, with dihedral angles of 10 (1) and 7(1)°. This near planar conformation is identical to that observed for 1,2,3-tri­chloro-5-nitro­benzene (Bhar et al., 1995 ▸), but contrasts with the twisted conformation observed in perhalogenated nitro­benzene derivatives: penta­chloro­nitro­benzene (twist angle of NO2: 62°; Tanaka et al., 1974 ▸) and 1-bromo-2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro-4-nitro­benzene (twist angle of NO2: 41.7 (3)°; Stein et al., 2011 ▸). It thus seems clear that twisting of the nitro group with respect to the benzene ring in nitro­benzene derivatives is a direct consequence of intra­molecular crowding with ortho substituents. For 1,2,3-halogenated-5-nitro­benzenes such as (I) and (II), a planar conformation should be expected as a rule.

Supra­molecular features

The crystal structures are directed by inter­molecular weak halogen bonds, also known as type-II inter­actions in the Desiraju classification scheme (Reddy et al., 2006 ▸). Such a bond is present in the asymmetric unit of (I), between Br2 and Br11 (Fig. 3 ▸). The type-II arrangement is characterized by angles θ 1 = C2—Br2⋯Br11 and θ 2 = C11—Br11⋯Br2, which should be close to 180 and 90°, respectively. For (I), observed angles are θ 1 = 165.2 (5)° and θ 2 = 82.3 (5)°. The crystal packing thus polarizes the involved halogen atoms, forming the halogen bond Br2δ+⋯Br11δ-. This dimolecular polar unit is connected via inversion centers to neighboring units in the cell, forming C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, and O⋯Br contacts. This packing motif induces secondary halogenhalogen contacts, which are clearly unpolarized. These type-I inter­actions are characterized by angles θ 1 ≃ θ 2 (Table 1 ▸, entries 2 and 3) and display larger BrBr separations compared to the polarized halogen bond (entry 1), in which electrostatic forces bring the atoms into close contact.
Figure 3

Part of the crystal structure of (I), emphasizing the halogen bonds (dashed lines). The green mol­ecules correspond to the asymmetric unit.

Table 1

Halogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)

X 1X 2 d θ1 θ2 bond type
Br2⋯Br113.642 (3)165.2 (5)82.3 (5)II-polarized
Br1⋯Br1i 3.731 (4)133.3 (4)133.3 (4)I-unpolarized
Br2⋯Br13ii 3.781 (3)126.8 (4)129.6 (4)I-unpolarized

Notes: d = separation X 1⋯X 2; θ1 = angle C—X 1⋯X 2; θ2 = angle X 1⋯X 2—C. For halogen bond types, see: Reddy et al. (2006 ▸). Symmetry codes: (i) −x, 1 − y, −z; (ii) −x, −y, 1 − z.

The substitution of one Br atom by I, to form crystal (II), changes dramatically the packing structure, affording a more complex network of halogen contacts (Fig. 4 ▸ and Table 2 ▸). Within the asymmetric unit, the type-II polarized contact is Br1⋯I12 (Table 2 ▸, entry 1). However, θ angles for this bond deviate from ideal values, and, surprisingly, the bond is polarized in the wrong way, Brδ+⋯Iδ-. The opposite polarization was expected for this bond, due to the lower electronegativity and higher polarizability of iodine compared to bromine. The other significant contact observed in the asymmetric unit is a BrBr unpolarized contact. The network of halogen bonds is expanded in the [100] direction by Br11, which gives a bifurcated contact with I2 and Br3 (Table 2 ▸, entries 2 and 4). One contact is polarized, with the polarization, once again, oriented in the unexpected way, I2δ-⋯Br11δ+. These anomalous halogen bonds are not present in other mixed halogen derivatives. Indeed, in 1,3-di­bromo-2-iodo­benzene (Schmidbaur et al., 2004 ▸), the iodine atom is not engaged in halogen bonding.
Figure 4

Part of the crystal structure of (II), emphasizing the halogen bonds (dashed lines). The green mol­ecules correspond to the asymmetric unit.

Table 2

Halogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)

X 1X 2 d θ1 θ2 bond type
Br1⋯I123.813 (2)161.2 (4)117.2 (4)II-polarized
I2⋯Br11i 3.893 (2)116.6 (4)161.8 (4)II-polarized
Br1⋯Br133.787 (2)142.8 (4)122.9 (4)I-unpolarized
Br11⋯Br3ii 3.858 (2)143.9 (4)124.4 (4)I-unpolarized

Notes: d = separation X 1⋯X 2; θ1 = angle C—X 1⋯X 2; θ2 = angle X 1⋯X 2—C. For halogen bond types, see: Reddy et al. (2006 ▸). Symmetry codes: (i) 1 + x, y, z; (ii) −1 + x, y, z.

Database survey

The current release of the CSD (Version 5.36 with all updates; Groom & Allen, 2014 ▸), contains many structures of halogen-substituted nitro­benzene, with Cl (e.g. Bhar et al., 1995 ▸; Tanaka et al., 1974 ▸), Br (e.g. Olaru et al., 2014 ▸), and I (Thalladi et al., 1996 ▸). This series is completed with nitro­phenol deriv­atives, for example 2,3-di­fluoro-4-iodo-6-nitro­phenol (Francke et al., 2010 ▸). Structures of penta­chloro­phenol (Brezgunova et al., 2012 ▸) and penta­bromo­phenol (Betz et al., 2008 ▸; Brezgunova et al., 2012 ▸) are also available. Regarding poly- and per-halogenated benzene structures, an impressive series of 23 compounds has been described, including Cl, Br, I and Me as substituents, generating a variety of mol­ecular symmetries (Reddy et al., 2006 ▸). The structure of D 6h-perhalogenated benzene has been reported with F (Shorafa et al., 2009 ▸), Cl (Brown & Strydom, 1974 ▸; Reddy et al., 2006 ▸), Br (Baharie & Pawley, 1979 ▸; Reddy et al., 2006 ▸; Brezgunova et al., 2012 ▸) and I (Ghosh et al., 2007 ▸). The former is a Z′ = 2 crystal, while others are Z′=1 crystals.

Synthesis and crystallization

Compounds (I) and (II) were synthesized from 2,6-di­bromo-4-nitro­aniline (Bryant et al., 1998 ▸), as depicted in Fig. 5 ▸.
Figure 5

Synthetic scheme for (I) and (II).

Synthesis of (I). A solution of 2,6-di­bromo-4-nitro­aniline (1.0 g, 3.38 mmol) in acetic acid (3 ml) was cooled to 278 K, and concentrated H2SO4 (7 ml) was carefully added under stirring. While ensuring that the temperature was still below 278 K, NaNO2 (0.708 g, 10.26 mmol) was added in one batch. The reaction was stirred at this temperature for 2 h to afford the diazo­nium salt. An aqueous solution (17.67 ml) of CuBr (4.95 g, 34.54 mmol) and 47% HBr (17.67 ml) was warmed to 343 K, and the diazo­tization solution previously prepared was added in one batch with stirring. The mixture was kept at 343 K for 1 h, and then left to cool overnight. The reaction was neutralized with NaOH and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 ml). The resulting solution was concentrated under vacuum and the crude material was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 8/2, R f = 0.49) to give (I). Crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of a methanol/ethyl ether solution (yield: 0.952 g, 2.65 mmol, 78%). m.p. 380–382 K. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3090 (Ar—H); 1583 (C=C); 1526, 1342 (N=O); 738 (CBr). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.43 (s, H-4, H-6). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.8, 135.7, 127.0, 126.9, 126.8. EIMS m/z: [M +] 357 (34), [M ++2] 359 (7), [M ++4] 361 (100), [M ++6] 363 (36) [M +-NO2] 311 (12). Synthesis of (II). A solution of 2,6-di­bromo-4-nitro­aniline (1.0 g, 3.38 mmol) in acetic acid (3 ml) was cooled to 278 K in an ice-salt bath, and concentrated H2SO4 (3 ml) was carefully added under stirring. While ensuring that the temperature was still below 278 K, NaNO2 (0.242 g, 3.516 mmol) was added in one batch. The reaction was stirred at this temperature for 30 min to afford the diazo­nium salt. An aqueous solution (10 ml) of KI (5.635 g, 33.95 mmol) was prepared, and the diazo­tization solution previously prepared was added in one batch. The mixture was then further stirred for 1 h. The reaction was neutralized with NaOH, extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 ml), and concentrated under vacuum. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 4/1, R f = 0.31) to give (II). Crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of an acetone/methanol/CH2Cl2 solution (yield: 1.21 g, 2.98 mmol, 88%). m.p. 415–417 K. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3010 (Ar—H); 1620, 1516 (C=C); 1336 (N=O). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.38 (s, H-4, H-6). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.1, 142.4, 127.4, 124.1. EIMS m/z: [M +] 405 (42), [M ++2] 407 (100), [M ++4] 409 (48).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details for (I) and (II) are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The absorption correction for (I) was challenging, and eventually carried out by applying DIFABS on the complete isotropic model (Walker & Stuart, 1983 ▸). In the case of (II), measured ψ-scans were used. H atoms were refined as riding to their carrier C atoms, with C—H bond lengths fixed at 0.93 Å and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(carrier atom).
Table 3

Experimental details

 (I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H2Br3NO2 C6H2Br2INO2
M r 359.82406.81
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298298
a, b, c (Å)7.641 (5), 8.040 (5), 14.917 (6)13.548 (3), 20.037 (3), 9.123 (2)
α, β, γ (°)83.91 (3), 79.86 (4), 81.49 (4)90, 130.37 (2), 90
V3)889.2 (8)1886.8 (8)
Z 48
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
μ (mm−1)13.5711.82
Crystal size (mm)0.42 × 0.40 × 0.300.50 × 0.22 × 0.12
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker P4Bruker P4
Absorption correctionPart of the refinement model (ΔF) (Walker & Stuart, 1983)ψ scan (XSCANS; Bruker, 1997)
T min, T max 0.0002, 0.0010.429, 0.988
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections6070, 3141, 15035716, 5407, 1968
R int 0.1200.058
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.5960.703
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.066, 0.196, 1.470.061, 0.153, 0.95
No. of reflections31415407
No. of parameters218218
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.79, −1.000.84, −0.84

Computer programs: XSCANS (Bruker, 1997 ▸), SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, II, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377/hb7459sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377/hb7459Isup2.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377/hb7459IIsup3.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377/hb7459Isup4.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015013377/hb7459IIsup5.cml CCDC references: 1412444, 1412445 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H2Br3NO2F(000) = 664
Mr = 359.82Dx = 2.688 Mg m3
Triclinic, P1Melting point: 380 K
a = 7.641 (5) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.040 (5) ÅCell parameters from 48 reflections
c = 14.917 (6) Åθ = 4.8–12.4°
α = 83.91 (3)°µ = 13.57 mm1
β = 79.86 (4)°T = 298 K
γ = 81.49 (4)°Irregular, colourless
V = 889.2 (8) Å30.42 × 0.40 × 0.30 mm
Z = 4
Bruker P4 diffractometer1503 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.120
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.6°
ω scansh = −8→9
Absorption correction: part of the refinement model (ΔF) (Walker & Stuart, 1983)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.0002, Tmax = 0.001l = 0→17
6070 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
3141 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.066H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.196w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.050P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.47(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3141 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.79 e Å3
218 parametersΔρmin = −1.00 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 constraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0063 (12)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.1438 (2)0.3194 (2)0.05082 (13)0.0863 (6)
Br20.2958 (2)0.0254 (2)0.20089 (11)0.0855 (6)
Br30.4312 (2)−0.3604 (2)0.13778 (10)0.0791 (5)
C10.2177 (18)0.1018 (19)0.0215 (9)0.070 (4)
C20.2831 (17)−0.0235 (17)0.0860 (9)0.063 (3)
C30.3360 (14)−0.1910 (16)0.0555 (8)0.056 (3)
C40.3227 (18)−0.2259 (19)−0.0296 (9)0.069 (4)
H40.3573−0.3355−0.04650.083*
C50.2615 (17)−0.1072 (16)−0.0895 (10)0.064 (3)
C60.2067 (16)0.0562 (16)−0.0661 (9)0.059 (3)
H60.16190.1373−0.10850.071*
N10.2502 (16)−0.1453 (18)−0.1809 (8)0.075 (3)
O10.2967 (16)−0.2925 (16)−0.2012 (7)0.094 (3)
O20.1923 (18)−0.0342 (15)−0.2318 (8)0.105 (4)
Br110.3943 (2)0.2012 (2)0.39885 (13)0.0891 (6)
Br120.1013 (2)0.1170 (2)0.58586 (10)0.0795 (6)
Br13−0.3231 (2)0.2845 (2)0.59130 (11)0.0865 (6)
C110.151 (2)0.2912 (18)0.4092 (12)0.077 (4)
C120.0303 (18)0.2505 (18)0.4860 (10)0.064 (3)
C13−0.150 (2)0.323 (2)0.4913 (9)0.073 (4)
C14−0.2002 (19)0.4188 (19)0.4208 (9)0.070 (4)
H14−0.32070.46190.42320.084*
C15−0.079 (2)0.4583 (18)0.3427 (8)0.068 (4)
C160.0943 (19)0.3923 (18)0.3375 (9)0.068 (4)
H160.17560.41550.28500.082*
N11−0.1327 (18)0.5801 (16)0.2644 (10)0.076 (3)
O11−0.2882 (14)0.6432 (13)0.2757 (7)0.083 (3)
O12−0.0224 (17)0.5952 (18)0.1956 (8)0.110 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0776 (11)0.0671 (10)0.1094 (12)−0.0047 (8)−0.0022 (9)−0.0140 (8)
Br20.0876 (11)0.0974 (13)0.0716 (9)−0.0124 (9)−0.0075 (8)−0.0164 (8)
Br30.0765 (10)0.0789 (11)0.0793 (10)−0.0043 (8)−0.0186 (8)0.0070 (8)
C10.062 (8)0.078 (10)0.072 (9)−0.013 (7)−0.022 (7)0.001 (7)
C20.058 (8)0.068 (9)0.062 (8)−0.006 (7)0.004 (6)−0.026 (7)
C30.034 (6)0.064 (8)0.060 (7)−0.001 (6)0.001 (6)0.012 (6)
C40.063 (8)0.072 (9)0.071 (9)0.022 (7)−0.018 (7)−0.030 (7)
C50.056 (8)0.051 (8)0.087 (10)−0.015 (6)−0.021 (7)0.009 (7)
C60.062 (8)0.052 (8)0.073 (8)−0.019 (6)−0.033 (7)0.003 (6)
N10.079 (8)0.081 (9)0.080 (8)−0.016 (7)−0.036 (7)−0.026 (7)
O10.119 (9)0.095 (9)0.071 (6)−0.005 (7)−0.017 (6)−0.032 (6)
O20.151 (11)0.087 (9)0.089 (7)−0.010 (8)−0.061 (8)0.004 (6)
Br110.0644 (10)0.0993 (13)0.1026 (12)0.0018 (9)−0.0185 (9)−0.0137 (10)
Br120.0955 (12)0.0701 (10)0.0769 (9)−0.0090 (8)−0.0294 (9)−0.0017 (7)
Br130.0785 (11)0.0945 (13)0.0808 (10)−0.0202 (9)0.0012 (8)0.0067 (9)
C110.084 (10)0.050 (8)0.102 (11)−0.013 (7)−0.021 (9)−0.015 (8)
C120.060 (8)0.062 (8)0.073 (9)−0.018 (7)−0.012 (8)−0.008 (7)
C130.081 (10)0.082 (10)0.060 (8)−0.020 (8)−0.024 (7)0.009 (7)
C140.056 (8)0.080 (10)0.065 (8)−0.010 (7)0.011 (7)−0.007 (7)
C150.088 (10)0.077 (10)0.040 (6)0.019 (8)−0.034 (7)−0.004 (6)
C160.070 (9)0.072 (9)0.062 (8)−0.028 (8)0.006 (7)−0.003 (7)
N110.067 (8)0.065 (8)0.093 (10)−0.005 (6)−0.017 (7)0.011 (7)
O110.074 (7)0.079 (7)0.099 (7)0.003 (6)−0.032 (6)−0.014 (6)
O120.097 (8)0.144 (12)0.077 (7)−0.012 (8)−0.011 (7)0.028 (7)
Br1—C11.831 (15)Br11—C111.877 (15)
Br2—C21.821 (12)Br12—C121.854 (14)
Br3—C31.886 (11)Br13—C131.842 (15)
C1—C61.415 (18)C11—C161.368 (19)
C1—C21.416 (18)C11—C121.38 (2)
C2—C31.445 (18)C12—C131.410 (19)
C3—C41.353 (17)C13—C141.313 (18)
C4—C51.328 (17)C14—C151.39 (2)
C4—H40.9300C14—H140.9300
C5—C61.381 (19)C15—C161.347 (19)
C5—N11.448 (18)C15—N111.515 (16)
C6—H60.9300C16—H160.9300
N1—O21.194 (15)N11—O111.211 (15)
N1—O11.238 (16)N11—O121.216 (16)
C6—C1—C2119.0 (13)C16—C11—C12120.4 (14)
C6—C1—Br1119.9 (9)C16—C11—Br11118.6 (13)
C2—C1—Br1121.0 (10)C12—C11—Br11120.9 (11)
C1—C2—C3116.2 (11)C11—C12—C13118.8 (13)
C1—C2—Br2121.3 (10)C11—C12—Br12122.1 (10)
C3—C2—Br2122.5 (9)C13—C12—Br12118.9 (10)
C4—C3—C2121.8 (11)C14—C13—C12118.8 (14)
C4—C3—Br3120.6 (10)C14—C13—Br13118.0 (11)
C2—C3—Br3117.6 (9)C12—C13—Br13123.1 (10)
C5—C4—C3121.5 (13)C13—C14—C15122.5 (13)
C5—C4—H4119.3C13—C14—H14118.8
C3—C4—H4119.3C15—C14—H14118.8
C4—C5—C6120.7 (13)C16—C15—C14119.2 (11)
C4—C5—N1121.1 (13)C16—C15—N11117.9 (13)
C6—C5—N1118.2 (11)C14—C15—N11122.8 (12)
C5—C6—C1120.8 (11)C15—C16—C11120.0 (14)
C5—C6—H6119.6C15—C16—H16120.0
C1—C6—H6119.6C11—C16—H16120.0
O2—N1—O1123.6 (12)O11—N11—O12127.0 (13)
O2—N1—C5118.3 (13)O11—N11—C15114.7 (13)
O1—N1—C5118.1 (12)O12—N11—C15118.1 (12)
C6—C1—C2—C30.6 (19)C16—C11—C12—C13−4 (2)
Br1—C1—C2—C3179.5 (9)Br11—C11—C12—C13179.1 (11)
C6—C1—C2—Br2−178.5 (10)C16—C11—C12—Br12−178.9 (11)
Br1—C1—C2—Br20.3 (16)Br11—C11—C12—Br124.0 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.3 (19)C11—C12—C13—C144 (2)
Br2—C2—C3—C4178.8 (11)Br12—C12—C13—C14179.4 (12)
C1—C2—C3—Br3178.0 (9)C11—C12—C13—Br13−178.0 (11)
Br2—C2—C3—Br3−2.8 (14)Br12—C12—C13—Br13−2.7 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C51 (2)C12—C13—C14—C15−3 (2)
Br3—C3—C4—C5−177.8 (11)Br13—C13—C14—C15178.7 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C6−1 (2)C13—C14—C15—C162 (2)
C3—C4—C5—N1179.1 (13)C13—C14—C15—N11−174.8 (15)
C4—C5—C6—C11 (2)C14—C15—C16—C11−2 (2)
N1—C5—C6—C1−178.8 (12)N11—C15—C16—C11175.4 (13)
C2—C1—C6—C5−1 (2)C12—C11—C16—C153 (2)
Br1—C1—C6—C5−180.0 (10)Br11—C11—C16—C15179.8 (11)
C4—C5—N1—O2179.2 (14)C16—C15—N11—O11−175.5 (13)
C6—C5—N1—O2−1 (2)C14—C15—N11—O111 (2)
C4—C5—N1—O11 (2)C16—C15—N11—O1210 (2)
C6—C5—N1—O1−178.8 (13)C14—C15—N11—O12−173.5 (15)
C6H2Br2INO2Dx = 2.864 Mg m3
Mr = 406.81Melting point: 415 K
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 13.548 (3) ÅCell parameters from 43 reflections
b = 20.037 (3) Åθ = 5.7–12.5°
c = 9.123 (2) ŵ = 11.82 mm1
β = 130.37 (2)°T = 298 K
V = 1886.8 (8) Å3Prism, brown
Z = 80.50 × 0.22 × 0.12 mm
F(000) = 1472
Bruker P4 diffractometer1968 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.058
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 2.2°
2θ/ω scansh = −14→19
Absorption correction: ψ scan (XSCANS; Bruker, 1997)k = 0→28
Tmin = 0.429, Tmax = 0.988l = −12→0
5716 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 97 reflections
5407 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.153w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.053P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.95(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
5407 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.84 e Å3
218 parametersΔρmin = −0.84 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 constraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.00093 (11)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.30362 (13)0.43988 (8)0.2401 (2)0.0615 (4)
I20.54556 (10)0.36925 (4)0.26460 (13)0.0583 (3)
Br30.73278 (12)0.49074 (7)0.26614 (18)0.0561 (4)
C10.4175 (11)0.4967 (7)0.2453 (16)0.035 (3)
C20.5191 (11)0.4723 (6)0.2535 (13)0.033 (3)
C30.5960 (11)0.5182 (6)0.2557 (17)0.038 (3)
C40.5754 (12)0.5862 (6)0.2478 (17)0.040 (3)
H4A0.62640.61710.24740.048*
C50.4763 (13)0.6050 (7)0.2405 (15)0.046 (4)
C60.3965 (12)0.5642 (7)0.2397 (18)0.048 (4)
H6A0.33070.58090.23550.057*
N10.4555 (13)0.6807 (6)0.2380 (17)0.065 (3)
O10.5145 (11)0.7161 (5)0.2088 (17)0.085 (4)
O20.3795 (15)0.6989 (5)0.2557 (18)0.105 (4)
Br11−0.18918 (13)0.30721 (8)0.2488 (2)0.0620 (4)
I120.04866 (10)0.37922 (4)0.26639 (13)0.0593 (3)
Br130.24427 (12)0.25893 (8)0.2825 (2)0.0588 (4)
C11−0.0736 (11)0.2509 (7)0.2562 (17)0.039 (3)
C120.0237 (12)0.2769 (7)0.2619 (14)0.035 (3)
C130.1046 (11)0.2312 (6)0.2672 (18)0.039 (3)
C140.0869 (13)0.1639 (6)0.2665 (18)0.045 (4)
H14A0.14290.13440.27360.054*
C15−0.0137 (13)0.1391 (8)0.2553 (16)0.045 (4)
C16−0.0922 (13)0.1829 (6)0.2507 (18)0.043 (4)
H16A−0.15960.16680.24370.052*
N11−0.0302 (15)0.0681 (6)0.2483 (17)0.066 (4)
O110.0350 (12)0.0323 (6)0.2418 (18)0.099 (4)
O12−0.1106 (14)0.0493 (6)0.2609 (17)0.099 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0558 (8)0.0680 (9)0.0684 (9)−0.0167 (7)0.0437 (7)−0.0035 (7)
I20.0737 (6)0.0268 (4)0.0723 (7)0.0048 (5)0.0464 (5)0.0017 (4)
Br30.0484 (7)0.0636 (9)0.0654 (9)0.0047 (7)0.0409 (7)0.0002 (7)
C10.041 (7)0.035 (7)0.033 (6)−0.012 (6)0.027 (5)−0.007 (5)
C20.043 (7)0.017 (6)0.035 (8)0.002 (5)0.024 (6)0.000 (4)
C30.042 (6)0.033 (7)0.041 (7)0.003 (5)0.028 (6)−0.004 (5)
C40.037 (7)0.036 (8)0.048 (8)−0.005 (6)0.027 (6)−0.003 (6)
C50.046 (7)0.023 (7)0.040 (8)0.005 (6)0.015 (6)−0.002 (5)
C60.036 (7)0.064 (10)0.045 (8)−0.003 (7)0.027 (6)−0.016 (7)
N10.066 (8)0.031 (7)0.075 (9)0.010 (7)0.036 (7)−0.001 (6)
O10.091 (8)0.030 (6)0.108 (9)−0.003 (6)0.053 (7)0.003 (6)
O20.163 (12)0.050 (7)0.137 (11)0.050 (8)0.112 (10)0.016 (6)
Br110.0522 (8)0.0681 (9)0.0685 (9)0.0108 (7)0.0404 (7)−0.0033 (7)
I120.0755 (6)0.0283 (4)0.0735 (7)−0.0069 (5)0.0479 (5)−0.0038 (4)
Br130.0488 (7)0.0631 (9)0.0703 (9)−0.0088 (7)0.0412 (7)−0.0014 (7)
C110.043 (7)0.035 (7)0.041 (7)−0.002 (6)0.028 (6)0.002 (6)
C120.041 (7)0.033 (8)0.039 (8)0.007 (6)0.030 (6)0.004 (4)
C130.033 (6)0.037 (8)0.042 (7)−0.005 (5)0.022 (6)−0.005 (6)
C140.051 (8)0.029 (7)0.044 (8)0.008 (6)0.025 (6)0.000 (6)
C150.063 (9)0.028 (7)0.056 (9)−0.015 (6)0.045 (8)−0.006 (5)
C160.046 (7)0.031 (7)0.042 (7)−0.021 (6)0.024 (6)−0.015 (5)
N110.096 (10)0.034 (7)0.073 (9)−0.018 (7)0.057 (8)−0.006 (6)
O110.101 (9)0.029 (6)0.147 (11)−0.010 (6)0.072 (8)−0.005 (7)
O120.144 (11)0.061 (7)0.130 (10)−0.042 (8)0.106 (9)−0.012 (6)
Br1—C11.894 (12)Br11—C111.895 (14)
I2—C22.088 (12)I12—C122.074 (14)
Br3—C31.875 (13)Br13—C131.888 (13)
C1—C61.375 (18)C11—C121.387 (17)
C1—C21.416 (17)C11—C161.381 (18)
C2—C31.380 (17)C12—C131.405 (17)
C3—C41.384 (16)C13—C141.370 (16)
C4—C51.353 (18)C14—C151.390 (19)
C4—H4A0.9300C14—H14A0.9300
C5—C61.35 (2)C15—C161.359 (19)
C5—N11.539 (18)C15—N111.435 (19)
C6—H6A0.9300C16—H16A0.9300
N1—O21.199 (17)N11—O111.168 (19)
N1—O11.221 (19)N11—O121.226 (18)
C6—C1—C2120.8 (13)C12—C11—C16121.2 (14)
C6—C1—Br1116.4 (11)C12—C11—Br11121.4 (11)
C2—C1—Br1122.8 (10)C16—C11—Br11117.3 (11)
C3—C2—C1118.1 (12)C11—C12—C13117.3 (13)
C3—C2—I2123.6 (10)C11—C12—I12120.7 (11)
C1—C2—I2118.4 (10)C13—C12—I12122.0 (10)
C2—C3—C4122.0 (13)C14—C13—C12120.8 (13)
C2—C3—Br3121.2 (10)C14—C13—Br13117.0 (11)
C4—C3—Br3116.8 (11)C12—C13—Br13122.2 (10)
C5—C4—C3115.9 (13)C13—C14—C15120.8 (14)
C5—C4—H4A122.0C13—C14—H14A119.6
C3—C4—H4A122.0C15—C14—H14A119.6
C4—C5—C6126.6 (14)C16—C15—C14118.8 (14)
C4—C5—N1116.2 (15)C16—C15—N11122.8 (14)
C6—C5—N1117.2 (15)C14—C15—N11118.3 (15)
C5—C6—C1116.7 (13)C15—C16—C11121.0 (14)
C5—C6—H6A121.7C15—C16—H16A119.5
C1—C6—H6A121.7C11—C16—H16A119.5
O2—N1—O1126.4 (14)O11—N11—O12124.2 (16)
O2—N1—C5117.6 (14)O11—N11—C15120.6 (18)
O1—N1—C5115.9 (17)O12—N11—C15115.0 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C30.0 (16)C16—C11—C12—C13−1.7 (16)
Br1—C1—C2—C3179.7 (9)Br11—C11—C12—C13180.0 (9)
C6—C1—C2—I2179.4 (9)C16—C11—C12—I12179.2 (9)
Br1—C1—C2—I2−1.0 (12)Br11—C11—C12—I120.8 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.8 (17)C11—C12—C13—C140.1 (17)
I2—C2—C3—C4179.9 (9)I12—C12—C13—C14179.2 (9)
C1—C2—C3—Br3−179.9 (9)C11—C12—C13—Br13−178.2 (9)
I2—C2—C3—Br30.7 (14)I12—C12—C13—Br130.9 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C50.9 (18)C12—C13—C14—C151.7 (19)
Br3—C3—C4—C5−179.9 (9)Br13—C13—C14—C15−179.9 (10)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.2 (18)C13—C14—C15—C16−1.9 (18)
C3—C4—C5—N1178.2 (11)C13—C14—C15—N11177.8 (12)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.5 (19)C14—C15—C16—C110.3 (18)
N1—C5—C6—C1−178.9 (10)N11—C15—C16—C11−179.5 (12)
C2—C1—C6—C50.6 (17)C12—C11—C16—C151.6 (19)
Br1—C1—C6—C5−179.1 (9)Br11—C11—C16—C15180.0 (10)
C4—C5—N1—O2−171.0 (13)C16—C15—N11—O11175.7 (14)
C6—C5—N1—O27.6 (18)C14—C15—N11—O11−4 (2)
C4—C5—N1—O112.4 (17)C16—C15—N11—O12−8.3 (19)
C6—C5—N1—O1−169.1 (12)C14—C15—N11—O12171.9 (13)
  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  The two structures of the hexafluorobenzene radical cation C6F6(*+).

Authors:  Hashem Shorafa; Doreen Mollenhauer; Beate Paulus; Konrad Seppelt
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Scientific conferences: A big hello to halogen bonding.

Authors:  Mate Erdelyi
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 24.427

5.  Isostructurality, polymorphism and mechanical properties of some hexahalogenated benzenes: the nature of halogen...halogen interactions.

Authors:  C Malla Reddy; Michael T Kirchner; Ravi C Gundakaram; K Anantha Padmanabhan; Gautam R Desiraju
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  2,3,4,5,6-Penta-bromo-phenol.

Authors:  Richard Betz; Peter Klüfers; Peter Mayer
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-09-13

7.  On The Nature of the Halogen Bond.

Authors:  Changwei Wang; David Danovich; Yirong Mo; Sason Shaik
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  1-Bromo-2,3,5,6-tetra-fluoro-4-nitro-benzene.

Authors:  Mario Stein; Anke Schwarzer; Jürg Hulliger; Edwin Weber
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-06-18

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.