Literature DB >> 26395779

Computing the structural influence matrix for biological systems.

Giulia Giordano1, Christian Cuba Samaniego2, Elisa Franco2, Franco Blanchini3.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of identifying structural influences of external inputs on steady-state outputs in a biological network model. We speak of a structural influence if, upon a perturbation due to a constant input, the ensuing variation of the steady-state output value has the same sign as the input (positive influence), the opposite sign (negative influence), or is zero (perfect adaptation), for any feasible choice of the model parameters. All these signs and zeros can constitute a structural influence matrix, whose (i, j) entry indicates the sign of steady-state influence of the jth system variable on the ith variable (the output caused by an external persistent input applied to the jth variable). Each entry is structurally determinate if the sign does not depend on the choice of the parameters, but is indeterminate otherwise. In principle, determining the influence matrix requires exhaustive testing of the system steady-state behaviour in the widest range of parameter values. Here we show that, in a broad class of biological networks, the influence matrix can be evaluated with an algorithm that tests the system steady-state behaviour only at a finite number of points. This algorithm also allows us to assess the structural effect of any perturbation, such as variations of relevant parameters. Our method is applied to nontrivial models of biochemical reaction networks and population dynamics drawn from the literature, providing a parameter-free insight into the system dynamics.

Keywords:  Influence matrix; Perfect adaptation; Steady-state variation; Structural analysis; Vertex algorithm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26395779     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-015-0933-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  35 in total

1.  Qualitative stability and ambiguity in model ecosystems.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Dambacher; Hang-Kwang Luh; Hiram W Li; Philippe A Rossignol
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Uri Alon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Principal difference between stability and structural stability (robustness) as used in systems biology.

Authors:  Svetoslav Nikolov; Elka Yankulova; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Valko Petrov
Journal:  Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci       Date:  2007-10

4.  Dynamical robustness of biological networks with hierarchical distribution of time scales.

Authors:  A N Gorban; O Radulescu
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.615

5.  Structural sources of robustness in biochemical reaction networks.

Authors:  Guy Shinar; Martin Feinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The interaction graph structure of mass-action reaction networks.

Authors:  Mirela Domijan; Elisabeth Pécou
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A structural classification of candidate oscillatory and multistationary biochemical systems.

Authors:  Franco Blanchini; Elisa Franco; Giulia Giordano
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation.

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; Carlos A Gómez-Uribe; Jerome T Mettetal; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Towards a theory of biological robustness.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  8 in total

1.  Exact probabilities for the indeterminacy of complex networks as perceived through press perturbations.

Authors:  David Koslicki; Mark Novak
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Inferring hidden causal relations between pathway members using reduced Google matrix of directed biological networks.

Authors:  José Lages; Dima L Shepelyansky; Andrei Zinovyev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ceramide-transfer protein-mediated ceramide transfer is a structurally tunable flow-inducing mechanism with structural feed-forward loops.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Loop analysis of blood pressure/volume homeostasis.

Authors:  Bruno Burlando; Franco Blanchini; Giulia Giordano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  A multistationary loop model of ALS unveils critical molecular interactions involving mitochondria and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Bruno Burlando; Marco Milanese; Giulia Giordano; Tiziana Bonifacino; Silvia Ravera; Franco Blanchini; Giambattista Bonanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Vertex results for the robust analysis of uncertain biochemical systems.

Authors:  Franco Blanchini; Patrizio Colaneri; Giulia Giordano; Irene Zorzan
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  A deeper understanding of system interactions can explain contradictory field results on pesticide impact on honey bees.

Authors:  Dimitri Breda; Davide Frizzera; Giulia Giordano; Elisa Seffin; Virginia Zanni; Desiderato Annoscia; Christopher J Topping; Franco Blanchini; Francesco Nazzi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Qualitative and quantitative responses to press perturbations in ecological networks.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano; Claudio Altafini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.