Literature DB >> 26395401

Resident Surgeons Underrate Their Laparoscopic Skills and Comfort Level When Compared With the Rating by Attending Surgeons.

Mitchell B Alameddine1, Jake Claflin1, Christopher P Scally2, David M Noble1, Bradley N Reames1, Michael J Englesbe1, Sandra L Wong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The development of operative skills during general surgery residency depends largely on the resident surgeons' (residents) ability to accurately self-assess and identify areas for improvement. We compared evaluations of laparoscopic skills and comfort level of residents from both the residents' and attending surgeons' (attendings') perspectives.
DESIGN: We prospectively observed 111 elective cholecystectomies at the University of Michigan as part of a larger quality improvement initiative. Immediately after the operation, both residents and attendings completed a survey in which they rated the residents' operative proficiency, comfort level, and the difficulty of the case using a previously validated instrument. Residents' and attendings' evaluations of residents' performance were compared using 2-sided t tests.
SETTING: The University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, MI. Large academic, tertiary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents and faculty at the University of Michigan performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between June 1 and August 31, 2013. Data were collected for 28 of the institution's 54 trainees.
RESULTS: Attendings rated residents higher than what residents rated themselves on a 5-point Likert-type scale regarding depth perception (3.86 vs. 3.38, p < 0.005), bimanual dexterity (3.75 vs. 3.36, p = 0.005), efficiency (3.58 vs. 3.18, p < 0.005), tissue handling (3.69 vs. 3.23, p < 0.005), and comfort while performing a case (3.86 vs. 3.38, p < 0.005). Attendings and residents were in agreement on the level of autonomy displayed by the resident during the case (3.31 vs. 3.34, p = 0.85), the level of difficulty of the case (2.98 vs. 2.85, p = 0.443), and the degree of teaching done by the attending during the case (3.61 vs. 3.54, p = 0.701).
CONCLUSIONS: A gap exists between residents' and attendings' perception of residents' laparoscopic skills and comfort level in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings call for improved communication between residents and attendings to ensure that graduates are adequately prepared to operate independently. In the context of changing methods of resident evaluations that call for explicitly defined competencies in surgery, it is essential that residents are able to accurately self-assess and be in general agreement with attendings on their level of laparoscopic skills and comfort level while performing a case.
Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; clinical competence; education; general surgery/education; graduate/standards; internship/residency; medical

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26395401      PMCID: PMC4662891          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  19 in total

1.  Educational feedback in the operating room: a gap between resident and faculty perceptions.

Authors:  Aaron R Jensen; Andrew S Wright; Sara Kim; Karen D Horvath; Kristine E Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman; Christopher G Andrew; Simon Bergman; Karen Leffondré; Donna Stanbridge; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  How to teach and evaluate learners in the operating room.

Authors:  Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors.

Authors:  Samer G Mattar; Adnan A Alseidi; Daniel B Jones; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Lee L Swanstrom; Ralph W Aye; Steven D Wexner; José M Martinez; Sharona B Ross; Michael M Awad; Morris E Franklin; Maurice E Arregui; Bruce D Schirmer; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Implementation of a preoperative briefing protocol improves accuracy of teamwork assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  John T Paige; Deborah L Aaron; Tong Yang; D Shannon Howell; Charles W Hilton; Isidore Cohn; Sheila W Chauvin
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 6.  Resident self-other assessor agreement: influence of assessor, competency, and performance level.

Authors:  Pamela A Lipsett; Ilene Harris; Steven Downing
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-08

7.  Resident self-assessment of operative experience in primary total knee and total hip arthroplasty: Is it accurate?

Authors:  Tomce Trajkovski; Christian Veillette; David Backstein; Veronica M R Wadey; Bill Kraemer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities.

Authors:  Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-03

9.  Do residents receive the same OR guidance as surgeons report? Difference between residents' and surgeons' perceptions of OR guidance.

Authors:  Xiaodong Phoenix Chen; Reed G Williams; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Development of Team Action Projects in Surgery (TAPS): a multilevel team-based approach to teaching quality improvement.

Authors:  Seth A Waits; Bradley N Reames; Robert W Krell; Benjamin Bryner; Terry Shih; Andrea T Obi; Peter K Henke; Rebecca M Minter; Michael J Englesbe; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.891

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in the Assessment of Surgical Resident Competency.

Authors:  Justin P Wagner; Catherine E Lewis; Areti Tillou; Vatche G Agopian; Chi Quach; Timothy R Donahue; O Joe Hines
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Sherif Aly; Susanna W L de Geus; Cullen O Carter; Teviah E Sachs; Donald T Hess; Jennifer F Tseng; Luise I M Pernar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simulation-based structured training for developing laparoscopy skills in general surgery and obstetrics & gynecology postgraduates.

Authors:  Kailash Charokar; Jyoti Nath Modi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-10-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.