O J Gadabu1, C V Munthali1, R Zachariah2, S Gudmund-Hinderaker3, A Jahn4, H Twea5, A Gondwe1, S Mumba1, M Lungu6, K Malisita6, E Mhango4, S D Makombe4, L Tenthani4, L Mwalwanda7, C Moyo8, G P Douglas9, Z L Lewis9, F Chimbwandira4. 1. Baobab Health Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi. 2. Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium ; Center for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 4. Department of HIV/AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi. 5. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France ; The Lighthouse Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi. 6. Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi. 7. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Lilongwe, Malawi. 8. Centre for Monitoring Evaluation Division, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi. 9. Center for Health Informatics for the Underserved, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
SETTING: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics at one central hospital, three district hospitals and one mission hospital in the central and southern regions of Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To measure the extent of inaccuracies in the transcription of case registration and recorded deaths between electronic medical data (EMR) and paper registers. This was done to inform the Ministry of Health on the reliability of the paper-based system as backup in case of EMR failure. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routine programme data. RESULTS: A total of 31 763 registrations and 2922 deaths in the EMR were compared with those in the paper registers. In one hospital, up to 24% of overall case registrations were missing from the paper registers. At other sites, the differences were minor and included duplicate patients who should have been classified as 'transfer in' patients in the paper register. There were major differences in the number of registered deaths in two of the five facilities. CONCLUSION: There are varying degrees of agreement between the EMR and paper registers which compromise the use of the latter as a backup solution in case of EMR failure. The reasons for this unreliability and ways forward to address the problem are discussed.
SETTING: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics at one central hospital, three district hospitals and one mission hospital in the central and southern regions of Malawi. OBJECTIVE: To measure the extent of inaccuracies in the transcription of case registration and recorded deaths between electronic medical data (EMR) and paper registers. This was done to inform the Ministry of Health on the reliability of the paper-based system as backup in case of EMR failure. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routine programme data. RESULTS: A total of 31 763 registrations and 2922 deaths in the EMR were compared with those in the paper registers. In one hospital, up to 24% of overall case registrations were missing from the paper registers. At other sites, the differences were minor and included duplicate patients who should have been classified as 'transfer in' patients in the paper register. There were major differences in the number of registered deaths in two of the five facilities. CONCLUSION: There are varying degrees of agreement between the EMR and paper registers which compromise the use of the latter as a backup solution in case of EMR failure. The reasons for this unreliability and ways forward to address the problem are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Malawi; electronic medical record; paper register; transcription
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gerald P Douglas; Oliver J Gadabu; Sabine Joukes; Soyapi Mumba; Michael V McKay; Anne Ben-Smith; Andreas Jahn; Erik J Schouten; Zach Landis Lewis; Joep J van Oosterhout; Theresa J Allain; Rony Zachariah; Selma D Berger; Anthony D Harries; Frank Chimbwandira Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Simon D Makombe; Mindy Hochgesang; Andreas Jahn; Hannock Tweya; Bethany Hedt; Stuart Chuka; Joseph Kwong-Leung Yu; John Aberle-Grasse; Olesi Pasulani; Christopher Bailey; Kelita Kamoto; Erik J Schouten; Anthony D Harries Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Martin C Were; Changyu Shen; Mwebesa Bwana; Nneka Emenyonu; Nicholas Musinguzi; Frank Nkuyahaga; Annet Kembabazi; William M Tierney Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Zach Landis-Lewis; Ronald Manjomo; Oliver J Gadabu; Matthew Kam; Bertha N Simwaka; Susan L Zickmund; Frank Chimbwandira; Gerald P Douglas; Rebecca S Jacobson Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2015-07-19 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Z Zulu; S Kunene; N Mkhonta; P Owiti; W Sikhondze; M Mhlanga; Z Simelane; E Geoffroy; R Zachariah Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2018-04-25
Authors: Hannock Tweya; Caryl Feldacker; Anne Ben-Smith; Anthony D Harries; Ryuichi Komatsu; Andreas Jahn; Sam Phiri; Jean-Michel Tassie Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 2.655