Z Zulu1, S Kunene1, N Mkhonta1, P Owiti2, W Sikhondze3, M Mhlanga4, Z Simelane5, E Geoffroy6, R Zachariah7. 1. National Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Manzini, Swaziland. 2. Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya. 3. Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland. 4. Epidemic, Preparedness and Response Unit, Ministry of Health, Ezulwini, Swaziland. 5. Strategic Information Department, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland. 6. Global AIDS Interfaith Alliance, San Rafael, California, USA. 7. Operational Centre Brussels, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
Abstract
Background: To be able to eliminate malaria, accurate, timely reporting and tracking of all confirmed malaria cases is crucial. Swaziland, a country in the process of eliminating malaria, has three parallel health information systems. Design: This was a cross-sectional study using country-wide programme data from 2010 to 2015. Methods: The Malaria Surveillance Database System (MSDS) is a comprehensive malaria database, the Immediate Disease Notification System (IDNS) is meant to provide early warning and trigger case investigations to prevent onward malaria transmission and potential epidemics, and the Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) reports on all morbidity at health facility level. Discrepancies were stratified by health facility level and type. Results: Consistent over-reporting of 9-85% was noticed in the HMIS, principally at the primary health care level (clinic and/or health centre). In the IDNS, the discrepancy went from under-reporting (12%) to over-reporting (32%); this was also seen at the primary care level. At the hospital level, there was under-reporting in both the HMIS and IDNS. Conclusions: There are considerable discrepancies in the numbers of confirmed malaria cases in the HMIS and IDNS in Swaziland. This may misrepresent the malaria burden and delay case investigation, predisposing the population to potential epidemics. There is an urgent need to improve data integrity in order to guide and evaluate efforts toward elimination.
Background: To be able to eliminate malaria, accurate, timely reporting and tracking of all confirmed malaria cases is crucial. Swaziland, a country in the process of eliminating malaria, has three parallel health information systems. Design: This was a cross-sectional study using country-wide programme data from 2010 to 2015. Methods: The Malaria Surveillance Database System (MSDS) is a comprehensive malaria database, the Immediate Disease Notification System (IDNS) is meant to provide early warning and trigger case investigations to prevent onward malaria transmission and potential epidemics, and the Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) reports on all morbidity at health facility level. Discrepancies were stratified by health facility level and type. Results: Consistent over-reporting of 9-85% was noticed in the HMIS, principally at the primary health care level (clinic and/or health centre). In the IDNS, the discrepancy went from under-reporting (12%) to over-reporting (32%); this was also seen at the primary care level. At the hospital level, there was under-reporting in both the HMIS and IDNS. Conclusions: There are considerable discrepancies in the numbers of confirmed malaria cases in the HMIS and IDNS in Swaziland. This may misrepresent the malaria burden and delay case investigation, predisposing the population to potential epidemics. There is an urgent need to improve data integrity in order to guide and evaluate efforts toward elimination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health Management Information Systems; SORT IT; malaria elimination; malaria reporting; malaria surveillance
Authors: O J Gadabu; C V Munthali; R Zachariah; S Gudmund-Hinderaker; A Jahn; H Twea; A Gondwe; S Mumba; M Lungu; K Malisita; E Mhango; S D Makombe; L Tenthani; L Mwalwanda; C Moyo; G P Douglas; Z L Lewis; F Chimbwandira Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2011-09-21
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gerald P Douglas; Oliver J Gadabu; Sabine Joukes; Soyapi Mumba; Michael V McKay; Anne Ben-Smith; Andreas Jahn; Erik J Schouten; Zach Landis Lewis; Joep J van Oosterhout; Theresa J Allain; Rony Zachariah; Selma D Berger; Anthony D Harries; Frank Chimbwandira Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Simon D Makombe; Mindy Hochgesang; Andreas Jahn; Hannock Tweya; Bethany Hedt; Stuart Chuka; Joseph Kwong-Leung Yu; John Aberle-Grasse; Olesi Pasulani; Christopher Bailey; Kelita Kamoto; Erik J Schouten; Anthony D Harries Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 9.408