AIMS: 5-FU is the backbone of most regimens in digestive oncology. Administration of standard 5-FU leads to 15-30% of severe side effects, and lethal toxicities are regularly reported with fluoropyrimidine drugs. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome responsible for most cases of life-threatening toxicities upon 5-FU intake, and pre-treatment checking for DPD status should help to reduce both incidence and severity of side effects through adaptive dosing strategies. METHODS: We have used a simple method for rapidly establishing the DPD phenotype of patients with cancer and used it prospectively in 59 routine patients treated with 5-FU-based therapy for digestive cancers. No patient with total DPD deficiency was found but 23% of patients exhibited poor metabolizer phenotype, and one patient was phenotyped as profoundly deficient. Consequently, 5-FU doses in poor metabolizer patients were cut by an average 35% as compared with non deficient patients (2390 ± 1225 mg vs. 3653 ± 1371 mg, P < 0.003, t-test). RESULTS: Despite this marked reduction in 5-FU dosing, similar efficacy was achieved in the two subsets (clinical benefit: 40 vs. 43%, stable disease: 40 vs. 37%, progressive disease: 20% in both subsets, P = 0.893, Pearson's chi-square). No difference in toxicities was observed (P = 0.104, Fisher's exact test). Overall, only 3% of early severe toxicities were recorded, a value markedly lower than the 15-30% ones usually reported with 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study shows how simplified DPD-based adaptive dosing of 5-FU can reduce sharply the incidence of treatment-related severe toxicities while maintaining efficacy as part of routine clinical practice in digestive oncology.
AIMS: 5-FU is the backbone of most regimens in digestive oncology. Administration of standard 5-FU leads to 15-30% of severe side effects, and lethal toxicities are regularly reported with fluoropyrimidine drugs. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome responsible for most cases of life-threatening toxicities upon 5-FU intake, and pre-treatment checking for DPD status should help to reduce both incidence and severity of side effects through adaptive dosing strategies. METHODS: We have used a simple method for rapidly establishing the DPD phenotype of patients with cancer and used it prospectively in 59 routine patients treated with 5-FU-based therapy for digestive cancers. No patient with total DPD deficiency was found but 23% of patients exhibited poor metabolizer phenotype, and one patient was phenotyped as profoundly deficient. Consequently, 5-FU doses in poor metabolizer patients were cut by an average 35% as compared with non deficientpatients (2390 ± 1225 mg vs. 3653 ± 1371 mg, P < 0.003, t-test). RESULTS: Despite this marked reduction in 5-FU dosing, similar efficacy was achieved in the two subsets (clinical benefit: 40 vs. 43%, stable disease: 40 vs. 37%, progressive disease: 20% in both subsets, P = 0.893, Pearson's chi-square). No difference in toxicities was observed (P = 0.104, Fisher's exact test). Overall, only 3% of early severe toxicities were recorded, a value markedly lower than the 15-30% ones usually reported with 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study shows how simplified DPD-based adaptive dosing of 5-FU can reduce sharply the incidence of treatment-related severe toxicities while maintaining efficacy as part of routine clinical practice in digestive oncology.
Authors: André B P van Kuilenburg; Peter Häusler; Andreas Schalhorn; Michael W T Tanck; Johannes H Proost; Christoph Terborg; Detlev Behnke; Wolfgang Schwabe; Kati Jabschinsky; Jan Gerard Maring Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: F Thomas; I Hennebelle; C Delmas; I Lochon; C Dhelens; C Garnier Tixidre; A Bonadona; N Penel; A Goncalves; J P Delord; C Toulas; E Chatelut Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Salvatore Terrazzino; Sarah Cargnin; Marzia Del Re; Romano Danesi; Pier Luigi Canonico; Armando A Genazzani Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Dan Rosmarin; Claire Palles; David Church; Enric Domingo; Angela Jones; Elaine Johnstone; Haitao Wang; Sharon Love; Patrick Julier; Claire Scudder; George Nicholson; Anna Gonzalez-Neira; Miguel Martin; Daniel Sargent; Erin Green; Howard McLeod; Ulrich M Zanger; Matthias Schwab; Michael Braun; Matthew Seymour; Lindsay Thompson; Benjamin Lacas; Valérie Boige; Nuria Ribelles; Shoaib Afzal; Henrik Enghusen; Søren Astrup Jensen; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Gérard Milano; Mia Wadelius; Bengt Glimelius; Hans Garmo; Milena Gusella; Thierry Lecomte; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Eva Martinez-Balibrea; Rohini Sharma; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas; Zdenek Kleibl; Alain Morel; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Rachel Midgley; David Kerr; Ian Tomlinson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Bart A W Jacobs; Maarten J Deenen; Dick Pluim; J G Coen van Hasselt; Martin D Krähenbühl; Robin M J M van Geel; Niels de Vries; Hilde Rosing; Didier Meulendijks; Artur M Burylo; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Manon Launay; Joseph Ciccolini; Claire Fournel; Carmelo Blanquicett; Charlotte Dupuis; Nicolas Fakhry; Florence Duffaud; Sébastien Salas; Bruno Lacarelle Journal: Clin Cancer Drugs Date: 2017
Authors: Linda M Henricks; Bart A W Jacobs; Didier Meulendijks; Dick Pluim; Daan van den Broek; Niels de Vries; Hilde Rosing; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Annemieke Cats; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.335