Dan Rosmarin1, Claire Palles, David Church, Enric Domingo, Angela Jones, Elaine Johnstone, Haitao Wang, Sharon Love, Patrick Julier, Claire Scudder, George Nicholson, Anna Gonzalez-Neira, Miguel Martin, Daniel Sargent, Erin Green, Howard McLeod, Ulrich M Zanger, Matthias Schwab, Michael Braun, Matthew Seymour, Lindsay Thompson, Benjamin Lacas, Valérie Boige, Nuria Ribelles, Shoaib Afzal, Henrik Enghusen, Søren Astrup Jensen, Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, Gérard Milano, Mia Wadelius, Bengt Glimelius, Hans Garmo, Milena Gusella, Thierry Lecomte, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Eva Martinez-Balibrea, Rohini Sharma, Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, Zdenek Kleibl, Alain Morel, Jean-Pierre Pignon, Rachel Midgley, David Kerr, Ian Tomlinson. 1. Dan Rosmarin, Claire Palles, David Church, Enric Domingo, Angela Jones, Ian Tomlinson, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford; Dan Rosmarin, David Church, Elaine Johnstone, Haitao Wang, Sharon Love, Patrick Julier, Claire Scudder, George Nicholson, Rachel Midgley, David Kerr, and George Nicholson, University of Oxford, Oxford; Michael Braun, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester; Matthew Seymour, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Lindsay Thompson, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit; Rohini Sharma, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith and Charing Cross Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; Anna Gonzalez-Neira, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre; Miguel Martin, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Nuria Ribelles, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga; Eva Martinez-Balibrea, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Institut de Recerca Sanitària Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, University Clinic of Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Daniel Sargent, Erin Green, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Howard McLeod, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Ulrich M. Zanger, Matthias Schwab, Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart; Ulrich M. Zanger, Matthias Schwab, University Hospital Tuebingenl, Tuebingen, Germany; Benjamin Lacas, Valérie Boige, Jean-Pierre Pignon, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, Gérard Milano, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice; Thierry Lecomte, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris; Alain Morel, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U564, Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France; Shoaib Afzal, Henrik Enghusen, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sør
Abstract
PURPOSE: Fluourouracil (FU) is a mainstay of chemotherapy, although toxicities are common. Genetic biomarkers have been used to predict these adverse events, but their utility is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested candidate polymorphisms identified from a systematic literature search for associations with capecitabine toxicity in 927 patients with colorectal cancer in the Quick and Simple and Reliable trial (QUASAR2). We then performed meta-analysis of QUASAR2 and 16 published studies (n = 4,855 patients) to examine the polymorphisms in various FU monotherapy and combination therapy regimens. RESULTS: Global capecitabine toxicity (grades 0/1/2 v grades 3/4/5) was associated with the rare, functional DPYD alleles 2846T>A and *2A (combined odds ratio, 5.51; P = .0013) and with the common TYMS polymorphisms 5'VNTR2R/3R and 3'UTR 6bp ins-del (combined odds ratio, 1.31; P = 9.4 × 10(-6)). There was weaker evidence that these polymorphisms predict toxicity from bolus and infusional FU monotherapy. No good evidence of association with toxicity was found for the remaining polymorphisms, including several currently included in predictive kits. No polymorphisms were associated with toxicity in combination regimens. CONCLUSION: A panel of genetic biomarkers for capecitabine monotherapy toxicity would currently comprise only the four DPYD and TYMS variants above. We estimate this test could provide 26% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 49% positive predictive value-better than most available commercial kits, but suboptimal for clinical use. The test panel might be extended to include additional, rare DPYD variants functionally equivalent to *2A and 2846A, though insufficient evidence supports its use in bolus, infusional, or combination FU. There remains a need to identify further markers of FU toxicity for all regimens.
PURPOSE: Fluourouracil (FU) is a mainstay of chemotherapy, although toxicities are common. Genetic biomarkers have been used to predict these adverse events, but their utility is uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested candidate polymorphisms identified from a systematic literature search for associations with capecitabine toxicity in 927 patients with colorectal cancer in the Quick and Simple and Reliable trial (QUASAR2). We then performed meta-analysis of QUASAR2 and 16 published studies (n = 4,855 patients) to examine the polymorphisms in various FU monotherapy and combination therapy regimens. RESULTS: Global capecitabine toxicity (grades 0/1/2 v grades 3/4/5) was associated with the rare, functional DPYD alleles 2846T>A and *2A (combined odds ratio, 5.51; P = .0013) and with the common TYMS polymorphisms 5'VNTR2R/3R and 3'UTR 6bp ins-del (combined odds ratio, 1.31; P = 9.4 × 10(-6)). There was weaker evidence that these polymorphisms predict toxicity from bolus and infusional FU monotherapy. No good evidence of association with toxicity was found for the remaining polymorphisms, including several currently included in predictive kits. No polymorphisms were associated with toxicity in combination regimens. CONCLUSION: A panel of genetic biomarkers for capecitabine monotherapy toxicity would currently comprise only the four DPYD and TYMS variants above. We estimate this test could provide 26% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 49% positive predictive value-better than most available commercial kits, but suboptimal for clinical use. The test panel might be extended to include additional, rare DPYD variants functionally equivalent to *2A and 2846A, though insufficient evidence supports its use in bolus, infusional, or combination FU. There remains a need to identify further markers of FU toxicity for all regimens.
Authors: Maarten J Deenen; Jolien Tol; Artur M Burylo; Valerie D Doodeman; Anthonius de Boer; Andrew Vincent; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Paul H M Smits; Jos H Beijnen; Cornelis J A Punt; Jan H M Schellens; Annemieke Cats Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniela Caronia; Miguel Martin; Javier Sastre; Julio de la Torre; José Angel García-Sáenz; Maria R Alonso; Leticia T Moreno; Guillermo Pita; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Javier Benítez; Anna González-Neira Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R Zarate; J Rodríguez; E Bandres; A Patiño-Garcia; M Ponz-Sarvise; A Viudez; N Ramirez; N Bitarte; A Chopitea; J Gacía-Foncillas Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Rohini Sharma; Janelle M Hoskins; Laurent P Rivory; Manuela Zucknick; Rosyln London; Christopher Liddle; Stephen J Clarke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Afzal; S A Jensen; B Vainer; U Vogel; J P Matsen; J B Sørensen; P K Andersen; H E Poulsen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: A Ruzzo; F Graziano; F Loupakis; D Santini; V Catalano; R Bisonni; R Ficarelli; A Fontana; F Andreoni; A Falcone; E Canestrari; G Tonini; D Mari; P Lippe; F Pizzagalli; G Schiavon; P Alessandroni; L Giustini; P Maltese; E Testa; E T Menichetti; M Magnani Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: W Chua; D Goldstein; C K Lee; H Dhillon; M Michael; P Mitchell; S J Clarke; B Iacopetta Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Caroline F Thorn; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Houda Hachad; Julie A Johnson; Ellen M McDonagh; Mark J Ratain; Mary V Relling; Stuart A Scott; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Bart A W Jacobs; Maarten J Deenen; Dick Pluim; J G Coen van Hasselt; Martin D Krähenbühl; Robin M J M van Geel; Niels de Vries; Hilde Rosing; Didier Meulendijks; Artur M Burylo; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: David Church; Rachel Kerr; Enric Domingo; Dan Rosmarin; Claire Palles; Kevin Maskell; Ian Tomlinson; David Kerr Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Reynold C Ly; Remington E Schmidt; Patrick J Kiel; Victoria M Pratt; Bryan P Schneider; Milan Radovich; Steven M Offer; Robert B Diasio; Todd C Skaar Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-06-12
Authors: Adam M Lee; Qian Shi; Steven R Alberts; Daniel J Sargent; Frank A Sinicrope; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Axel Grothey; Blase Polite; Emily Chan; Sharlene Gill; Morton S Kahlenberg; Suresh G Nair; Anthony F Shields; Richard M Goldberg; Robert B Diasio Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: G Gentile; A Botticelli; L Lionetto; F Mazzuca; M Simmaco; P Marchetti; M Borro Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 3.550