Literature DB >> 35239419

Survey of US Medical Oncologists' Practices and Beliefs Regarding DPYD Testing Before Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy.

Kyoin Koo1, Amy L Pasternak1, N Lynn Henry2,3, Vaibhav Sahai2,3, Daniel L Hertz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients who carry reduced-activity DPYD polymorphisms have increased fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity risk. Although pretreatment DPYD testing is recommended throughout most of Europe, it is not recommended in the United States, and adoption has been limited. The objective of this survey was to describe the current practice in the United States regarding pretreatment DPYD testing and understand the factors deterring oncologists from ordering testing.
METHODS: Survey invitations were e-mailed to 325 medical oncologists practicing in the United States who are members of the SWOG Cancer Research Network Gastrointestinal Cancer, Breast Cancer, or Early Therapeutics Committees. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate survey responses.
RESULTS: Responses were collected from 59 (18.2%) US medical oncologists, of whom 98% strongly or somewhat agree that patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency have increased toxicity risk and 96% would modify FP dosing for a patient with known DPD deficiency. However, only 32% strongly or somewhat agree that pretreatment DPYD testing is useful to inform FP treatment, 20% have ever ordered pretreatment testing, and 3% order testing for at least 10% of their FP-treated patients. The most important factors that deter oncologists from ordering testing were low prevalence of DPD deficiency (54%) and lack of clinical practice guideline recommendations (48%).
CONCLUSION: Clinical adoption of pretreatment DPYD testing is extremely limited in the United States. Utilization may be substantially increased by inclusion in the oncology clinical practice guideline recommendations, coverage through health insurance, and potentially education of medical oncologists regarding available treatment modification guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239419      PMCID: PMC9191302          DOI: 10.1200/OP.21.00874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  24 in total

1.  Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  E J Stanek; C L Sanders; K A Johansen Taber; M Khalid; A Patel; R R Verbrugge; B C Agatep; R E Aubert; R S Epstein; F W Frueh
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  DPYD variants as predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity in adjuvant colon cancer treatment (NCCTG N0147).

Authors:  Adam M Lee; Qian Shi; Emily Pavey; Steven R Alberts; Daniel J Sargent; Frank A Sinicrope; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Richard M Goldberg; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Increased prevalence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in African-Americans compared with Caucasians.

Authors:  Lori Kay Mattison; Jeanne Fourie; Renee A Desmond; Anil Modak; Muhammad Wasif Saif; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Cancer pharmacogenomics, adoption by oncologists and patient benefit.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler; Allison M Deal; Jai Patel; Janell Markey; Marcia Van Riper; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients carrying the DPYD*2A variant: A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Linda M Henricks; Lisanne N van Merendonk; Didier Meulendijks; Maarten J Deenen; Jos H Beijnen; Anthonius de Boer; Annemieke Cats; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Upfront Genotyping of DPYD*2A to Individualize Fluoropyrimidine Therapy: A Safety and Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Didier Meulendijks; Annemieke Cats; Marjolein K Sechterberger; Johan L Severens; Henk Boot; Paul H Smits; Hilde Rosing; Caroline M P W Mandigers; Marcel Soesan; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pathogenic DPYD Variants and Treatment-Related Mortality in Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bhavina B Sharma; Karan Rai; Heather Blunt; Wenyan Zhao; Tor D Tosteson; Gabriel A Brooks
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction of DPYD and fluoropyrimidines.

Authors:  Carin A T C Lunenburg; Cathelijne H van der Wouden; Jesse J Swen; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Marga Nijenhuis; Mandy H Crommentuijn-van Rhenen; Nienke J de Boer-Veger; Anne Marie Buunk; Elisa J F Houwink; Hans Mulder; Gerard A Rongen; Ron H N van Schaik; Jan van der Weide; Bob Wilffert; Vera H M Deneer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Consensus of experts from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology for the genotyping of DPYD in cancer patients who are candidates for treatment with fluoropyrimidines.

Authors:  P García-Alfonso; M Saiz-Rodríguez; R Mondéjar; J Salazar; D Páez; A M Borobia; M J Safont; I García-García; R Colomer; X García-González; M J Herrero; L A López-Fernández; F Abad-Santos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  DPYD and Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Mini Review and Case Report.

Authors:  Theodore J Wigle; Elena V Tsvetkova; Stephen A Welch; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.