Literature DB >> 26390380

Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging.

Susan Harvey1, Aimee M Gallagher2, Martha Nolan2, Christine M Hughes3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26390380      PMCID： PMC4589306          DOI： 10.1089/jwh.2015.29001.swh

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN： 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


× No keyword cloud information.
  30 in total

1.  Recall and detection rates in screening mammography.

Authors:  David Gur; Jules H Sumkin; Lara A Hardesty; Ronald J Clearfield; Cathy S Cohen; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Kathleen M Harris; William R Poller; Ratan Shah; Luisa P Wallace; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

Authors:  Cristina O'Donoghue; Martin Eklund; Elissa M Ozanne; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Dennis G Fryback; Cristina S Hammond; Lucy G Hanna; Margaret R Grove; Mary Brown; Qianfei Wang; Karen Lindfors; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  Anetta Bolejko; Sophia Zackrisson; Peter Hagell; Christine Wann-Hansson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Philip W Chu; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Roger Blanks; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Janet K Bobo; Nancy C Lee; Matthew G Wallis; Julietta Patnick; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

Authors:  Sarah M Friedewald; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Stephen L Rose; Melissa A Durand; Donna M Plecha; Julianne S Greenberg; Mary K Hayes; Debra S Copit; Kara L Carlson; Thomas M Cink; Lora D Barke; Linda N Greer; Dave P Miller; Emily F Conant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A reader study comparing prospective tomosynthesis interpretations with retrospective readings of the corresponding FFDM examinations.

Authors:  Stephen L Rose; Andra L Tidwell; Mary F Ice; Amy S Nordmann; Russell Sexton; Rui Song
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Volkert Dirk Siersma
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai; Yulia S Krivoshekova; Lynn Ryzewicz; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mammography Screening: Gaps in Patient's and Physician's Needs for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Sarina Schrager; Helene McDowell; Lee G Wilke; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Women's experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Susan Brandzel; Dori E Rosenberg; Dianne Johnson; Mary Bush; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Louise Henderson; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Wendy DeMartini; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Nila Alsheik; Linda Blount; Qiu Qiong; Melinda Talley; Scott Pohlman; Kathleen Troeger; Genevieve Abbey; Victoria L Mango; Erica Pollack; Alice Chong; Greg Donadio; Michael Behling; Kathleen Mortimer; Emily Conant
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.