Literature DB >> 24313329

A roller coaster of emotions and sense--coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.

Anetta Bolejko1, Sophia Zackrisson, Peter Hagell, Christine Wann-Hansson.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To explore coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.
BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening has been found effective to decrease breast cancer (BC) mortality, yet there are adverse effects. Psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographic screening have mainly been investigated from a population-based perspective. A call for qualitative studies to further explore these consequences has thus been postulated. To date, qualitative studies have elucidated women's experiences following their recall breast examinations, but their coping with perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography has not yet been explored.
DESIGN: An explorative qualitative study.
METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were held with a purposive heterogeneous sample of 13 Swedish-speaking women with a false-positive screening mammography. The transcripts were analysed by the use of an inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: Coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false-positive screening mammography implied a roller coaster of emotion and sense. Women described how they imagined the worst and were in a state of uncertainty feeling threatened by a fatal disease. Conversely, they felt protected, surrounded by their families and being professionally taken care of, which together with perceived sisterhood and self-empowerment evoked strength and hope. Being aware of family responsibility became a crucial matter. Experiencing false-positive screening raised thoughts of thankfulness and reappraisal of life, although an ounce of BC anxiety remained. Consequently, gained awareness about BC screening and values in life surfaced.
CONCLUSIONS: Experiencing a false-positive screening mammography triggers agonising experiences evoking a variety of coping strategies. Provision of screening raises the issue of responsibility for an impact on psychosocial well-being among healthy women. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Gained knowledge might provide a basis for interventions to prevent psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographic screening and provide support for women with a potentially compromised ability to overcome such consequences.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  content analysis; false-positive screening mammography; mammographic screening; qualitative studies; women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24313329     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  7 in total

1.  Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Susan Harvey; Aimee M Gallagher; Martha Nolan; Christine M Hughes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Agnes M F Fausto; M C Lopes; M C de Sousa; Tânia A C Furquim; Anderson W Mol; Fermin G Velasco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effects of a case management program on patients with oral precancerous lesions: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ying Lin; Shu-Ching Chen; Hsi-Ling Peng; Mu-Kuan Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Individuals' Experiences of Being Screened for Hypertension in Dental Health Care - "No Big Deal".

Authors:  Helen Andersson; Håkan Bergh; Stefan Bergman; Ulrika Bergsten
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?

Authors:  Magnus Dustler; Daniel Förnvik; Pontus Timberg; Ingvar Andersson; Hannie Petersson; Håkan Brorson; Anders Tingberg; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.

Authors:  Alexander G Mathioudakis; Minna Salakari; Liisa Pylkkanen; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Anke Bramesfeld; Silvia Deandrea; Donata Lerda; Luciana Neamtiu; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Ivan Solà; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.

Authors:  Sian Williamson; Jacoby Patterson; Rebecca Crosby; Rebecca Johnson; Harbinder Sandhu; Samantha Johnson; Jacquie Jenkins; Margaret Casey; Olive Kearins; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-12-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.