| Literature DB >> 26388702 |
Qiang Sun1,2, Shuai Chen1, Xue Zhao3, Ming Yan4, Zheng Fang1, Haibin Wang1, Junfang Zhao1, Minglei Sun1, Xinguang Han1, Wantao Chen4, Xinming Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Growth; HNSCC; Invasion; Metastasis; miR-645
Year: 2015 PMID: 26388702 PMCID: PMC4573489 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-015-0238-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Fig. 1Clinical association of miR-645 with HNSCC patients. a Mature miR-645 levels were measured in HNSCC samples by real-time PCR. b Kaplan–Meier graph representing the probability of disease-free survival in HNSCC patients from the “Milan-INT” dataset stratified. The log-rank test P value reflects the significance of the association between low miR-645 level and disease-free survival. c–e Mature miR-645 levels were compared between HNSCC samples with severe histological signs (vascular emboli, perineural invasion, diffuse infiltration) and the tissues with non-severe histological signs by real-time PCR
Associations between miR-645 and clinical parameters (n = 62)
| Characteristic | No. of patients | miR-645 ∆Cta |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | Mean ± SD | ||
| Age, years | ||||
| ≥60 | 26 | 41.9 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.173 |
| <60 | 36 | 58.1 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 43 | 69.4 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.625 |
| Female | 19 | 30.6 | 0.45 ± 0.13 | |
| Pathologe grade | ||||
| I | 26 | 42.6 | 0.22 ± 0.076 | 0.025 |
| II | 27 | 44.3 | 0.46 ± 0.12 | |
| III | 8 | 13.1 | 0.82 ± 0.21 | |
| T stage | ||||
| T1, 2 | 27 | 43.5 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.406 |
| T3, 4 | 34 | 54.8 | 0.46 ± 0.11 | |
| N stage | ||||
| pN− | 28 | 45.2 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.017 |
| pN+ | 34 | 54.8 | 0.54 ± 0.12 | |
| Site | ||||
| Tongue | 25 | 41.7 | 0.32 ± 0.11 | 0.514 |
| Gingival | 12 | 20.0 | 0.44 ± 0.18 | |
| Cheek | 7 | 11.7 | 0.35 ± 0.16 | |
| Floor of mouth | 11 | 18.3 | 0.34 ± 0.15 | |
| Oropharynx | 5 | 8.3 | 0.80 ± 0.41 | |
| Histologic signs of severity (vascular emboli, perineural invasion, diffuse infiltration) | ||||
| None | 26 | 41.9 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.024 |
| Presence | 21 | 33.9 | 0.60 ± 0.13 | |
| Smoking history | ||||
| Nonsmoker | 28 | 45.2 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.452 |
| Smoker | 30 | 48.4 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | |
| Alcohol history | ||||
| Nondrinker | 38 | 61.3 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.339 |
| Drinker | 20 | 32.3 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | |
SD standard deviation, T tumor stage, N lymphnode stage
a∆Ct indicates the difference in the cycle number at which a sample’s fluorescent signal passes a given threshold above baseline (Ct) derived from a specific gene compared with that of U6 in tumor tissues
Fig. 2miR-645 promotes HNSCC. a Expression levels of miR-645 in cellular models of metastatic progression were tested by real-time PCR. Values related to the nonmetastatic, less aggressive cell line (HN4) are normalised to U6 and shown as the mean and SD. b, c Cell growth curves: proliferation of phenotypically stable indicated cell lines was monitored by the CCK-8 assay. d Linear regression analyse the correlation between miR-645 and IFIT2
Fig. 3miR-645 promotes cell invasion and migration. a, b Representative pictures of cells migrated through the filter, stained with crystal violet, and taken at the same magnification and absolute quantifications as cells that had invaded through the transwell. c, d Wound-healing assay showing that gain of miR-645 promotes cell migration and loss of miR-645 suppresses cell migration
Fig. 4miR-645 promotes single cell clone proliferation. a, b Representative pictures of single cell clone proliferation, stained with crystal violet, colony formation assay in the group of 1 × 105 cells for miR-NC transfected and miR-645-transfected cells