PURPOSE: The involvement of microRNAs in cancer and their potential as biomarkers of diagnosis and prognosis are becoming increasingly appreciated. We sought to identify microRNAs altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to determine whether microRNA expression is predictive of disease. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RNA isolated from fresh-frozen primary tumors, fresh-frozen nondiseased head and neck epithelial tissues, and HNSCC cell lines was profiled for the expression of 662 microRNAs by microarray. The microRNAs that were both differentially expressed on the array and by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR were subsequently validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR using a total of 99 HNSCC samples and 14 normal epithelia. RESULTS: A marked difference in microRNA expression pattern was observed between tumors and cell lines. Eighteen microRNAs were significantly altered in their expression between normal tissues and tumors. Four of these microRNAs were validated in the larger sample series, and each showed significant differential expression (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, an expression ratio of miR-221:miR-375 showed a high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.93) for disease prediction. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that cultured tumor cell lines are inappropriate for microRNA biomarker identification and that the pattern of microRNA expression in primary head and neck tissues is reflective of disease status, with certain microRNAs exhibiting strong predictive potential. These results indicate that miR-221 and miR-375 should be evaluated further as diagnostic biomarkers because they may hold utility in defining broadly responsive prevention and treatment strategies for HNSCC.
PURPOSE: The involvement of microRNAs in cancer and their potential as biomarkers of diagnosis and prognosis are becoming increasingly appreciated. We sought to identify microRNAs altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to determine whether microRNA expression is predictive of disease. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RNA isolated from fresh-frozen primary tumors, fresh-frozen nondiseased head and neck epithelial tissues, and HNSCC cell lines was profiled for the expression of 662 microRNAs by microarray. The microRNAs that were both differentially expressed on the array and by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR were subsequently validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR using a total of 99 HNSCC samples and 14 normal epithelia. RESULTS: A marked difference in microRNA expression pattern was observed between tumors and cell lines. Eighteen microRNAs were significantly altered in their expression between normal tissues and tumors. Four of these microRNAs were validated in the larger sample series, and each showed significant differential expression (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, an expression ratio of miR-221:miR-375 showed a high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.93) for disease prediction. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that cultured tumor cell lines are inappropriate for microRNA biomarker identification and that the pattern of microRNA expression in primary head and neck tissues is reflective of disease status, with certain microRNAs exhibiting strong predictive potential. These results indicate that miR-221 and miR-375 should be evaluated further as diagnostic biomarkers because they may hold utility in defining broadly responsive prevention and treatment strategies for HNSCC.
Authors: Huiling He; Krystian Jazdzewski; Wei Li; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Rebecca Nagy; Stefano Volinia; George A Calin; Chang-Gong Liu; Kaarle Franssila; Saul Suster; Richard T Kloos; Carlo M Croce; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-12-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A E Szafranska; T S Davison; J John; T Cannon; B Sipos; A Maghnouj; E Labourier; S A Hahn Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Nham Tran; Tessa McLean; Xiaoying Zhang; Chuan Jia Zhao; John Michael Thomson; Christopher O'Brien; Barbara Rose Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Dohun Pyeon; Michael A Newton; Paul F Lambert; Johan A den Boon; Srikumar Sengupta; Carmen J Marsit; Craig D Woodworth; Joseph P Connor; Thomas H Haugen; Elaine M Smith; Karl T Kelsey; Lubomir P Turek; Paul Ahlquist Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Wigard P Kloosterman; Anne K Lagendijk; René F Ketting; Jon D Moulton; Ronald H A Plasterk Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Angela J Yoon; Shuang Wang; Jing Shen; Nicolas Robine; Elizabeth Philipone; Martin W Oster; Albert Nam; Regina M Santella Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2014-10-11 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Brock C Christensen; Michele Avissar-Whiting; Lauren G Ouellet; Rondi A Butler; Heather H Nelson; Michael D McClean; Carmen J Marsit; Karl T Kelsey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Jill Koshiol; Ena Wang; Yingdong Zhao; Francesco Marincola; Maria Teresa Landi Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Owen M Wilkins; Alexander J Titus; Lucas A Salas; Jiang Gui; Melissa Eliot; Rondi A Butler; Erich M Sturgis; Guojun Li; Karl T Kelsey; Brock C Christensen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Wojciech Mydlarz; Mamoru Uemura; Sun Ahn; Patrick Hennessey; Steven Chang; Semra Demokan; Wenyue Sun; Chunbo Shao; Justin Bishop; Julie Krosting; Elizabeth Mambo; William Westra; Patrick Ha; David Sidransky; Joseph Califano Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 12.531