Literature DB >> 33348259

Estimation of load conditions and strain distribution for in vivo murine tibia compression loading using experimentally informed finite element models.

Edmund Pickering1, Matthew J Silva2, Peter Delisser3, Michael D Brodt4, YuanTong Gu5, Peter Pivonka5.   

Abstract

The murine tibia compression model, is the gold standard for studying bone adaptation due to mechanical loading in vivo. Currently, a key limitation of the experimental protocol and associated finite element (FE) models is that the exact load transfer, and consequently the loading conditions on the tibial plateau, is unknown. Often in FE models, load is applied to the tibial plateau based on inferences from micro-computed tomography (μCT). Experimental models often use a single strain gauge to assess the three-dimensional (3D) loading state. However, a single strain gauge is insufficient to validate such FE models. To address this challenge, we develop an experimentally calibrated method for identifying the load application region on the tibial plateau based upon measurements from three strain gauges. To achieve this, axial compression was conducted on mouse tibiae (n=3), with strains gauges on three surfaces. FE simulations were performed to compute the strains at the gauge locations as a function of a variable load location. By minimising the error between experimental and FE strains, the precise load location was identified; this was found to vary between tibia specimens. It was further shown that commonly used FE loading conditions, found in literature, did not replicate the experimental strain distribution, highlighting the importance of load calibration. This work provides critical insights into how load is transferred to the tibial plateau. Importantly, this work develops an experimentally informed technique for loading the tibial plateau in FE models.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone adaptation; Bone mechanics; Finite element modelling; Mouse tibia loading; Strain gauging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33348259      PMCID: PMC7856106          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

Review 1.  From mechanical stimulus to bone formation: A review.

Authors:  Natacha Rosa; Ricardo Simoes; Fernão D Magalhães; Antonio Torres Marques
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  The effects of misalignment during in vivo loading of bone: techniques to detect the proximity of objects in three-dimensional models.

Authors:  M G Goff; K L Chang; E N Litts; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: a new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element.

Authors:  Roberto L De Souza; Maiko Matsuura; Felix Eckstein; Simon C F Rawlinson; Lance E Lanyon; Andrew A Pitsillides
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Skeletal maturity leads to a reduction in the strain magnitudes induced within the bone: a murine tibia study.

Authors:  Hajar Razi; Annette I Birkhold; Paul Zaslansky; Richard Weinkamer; Georg N Duda; Bettina M Willie; Sara Checa
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Bone mass is preserved and cancellous architecture altered due to cyclic loading of the mouse tibia after orchidectomy.

Authors:  J Christopher Fritton; Elizabeth R Myers; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Experimental and finite element analysis of strains induced by axial tibial compression in young-adult and old female C57Bl/6 mice.

Authors:  Tarpit K Patel; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effect of integration time on the morphometric, densitometric and mechanical properties of the mouse tibia.

Authors:  S Oliviero; Y Lu; M Viceconti; E Dall'Ara
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Predicting cortical bone adaptation to axial loading in the mouse tibia.

Authors:  A F Pereira; B Javaheri; A A Pitsillides; S J Shefelbine
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Variability in strain distribution in the mice tibia loading model: A preliminary study using digital volume correlation.

Authors:  M Giorgi; E Dall'Ara
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Spatial relationship between bone formation and mechanical stimulus within cortical bone: Combining 3D fluorochrome mapping and poroelastic finite element modelling.

Authors:  A Carrieroa; A F Pereirab; A J Wilson; S Castagno; B Javaheri; A A Pitsillides; M Marenzana; S J Shefelbine
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-02-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cortical Thickness Adaptive Response to Mechanical Loading Depends on Periosteal Position and Varies Linearly With Loading Magnitude.

Authors:  Corey J Miller; Silvia Trichilo; Edmund Pickering; Saulo Martelli; Peter Delisser; Lee B Meakin; Peter Pivonka
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.